Cargando…

Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments

Uncertainty analysis is the process of identifying limitations in scientific knowledge and evaluating their implications for scientific conclusions. It is therefore relevant in all EFSA's scientific assessments and also necessary, to ensure that the assessment conclusions provide reliable infor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benford, Diane, Halldorsson, Thorhallur, Jeger, Michael John, Knutsen, Helle Katrine, More, Simon, Naegeli, Hanspeter, Noteborn, Hubert, Ockleford, Colin, Ricci, Antonia, Rychen, Guido, Schlatter, Josef R, Silano, Vittorio, Solecki, Roland, Turck, Dominique, Younes, Maged, Craig, Peter, Hart, Andrew, Von Goetz, Natalie, Koutsoumanis, Kostas, Mortensen, Alicja, Ossendorp, Bernadette, Martino, Laura, Merten, Caroline, Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf, Hardy, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625671
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5123
_version_ 1783495732395769856
author Benford, Diane
Halldorsson, Thorhallur
Jeger, Michael John
Knutsen, Helle Katrine
More, Simon
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Noteborn, Hubert
Ockleford, Colin
Ricci, Antonia
Rychen, Guido
Schlatter, Josef R
Silano, Vittorio
Solecki, Roland
Turck, Dominique
Younes, Maged
Craig, Peter
Hart, Andrew
Von Goetz, Natalie
Koutsoumanis, Kostas
Mortensen, Alicja
Ossendorp, Bernadette
Martino, Laura
Merten, Caroline
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Hardy, Anthony
author_facet Benford, Diane
Halldorsson, Thorhallur
Jeger, Michael John
Knutsen, Helle Katrine
More, Simon
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Noteborn, Hubert
Ockleford, Colin
Ricci, Antonia
Rychen, Guido
Schlatter, Josef R
Silano, Vittorio
Solecki, Roland
Turck, Dominique
Younes, Maged
Craig, Peter
Hart, Andrew
Von Goetz, Natalie
Koutsoumanis, Kostas
Mortensen, Alicja
Ossendorp, Bernadette
Martino, Laura
Merten, Caroline
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Hardy, Anthony
collection PubMed
description Uncertainty analysis is the process of identifying limitations in scientific knowledge and evaluating their implications for scientific conclusions. It is therefore relevant in all EFSA's scientific assessments and also necessary, to ensure that the assessment conclusions provide reliable information for decision‐making. The form and extent of uncertainty analysis, and how the conclusions should be reported, vary widely depending on the nature and context of each assessment and the degree of uncertainty that is present. This document provides concise guidance on how to identify which options for uncertainty analysis are appropriate in each assessment, and how to apply them. It is accompanied by a separate, supporting opinion that explains the key concepts and principles behind this Guidance, and describes the methods in more detail.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70097272020-07-02 Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments Benford, Diane Halldorsson, Thorhallur Jeger, Michael John Knutsen, Helle Katrine More, Simon Naegeli, Hanspeter Noteborn, Hubert Ockleford, Colin Ricci, Antonia Rychen, Guido Schlatter, Josef R Silano, Vittorio Solecki, Roland Turck, Dominique Younes, Maged Craig, Peter Hart, Andrew Von Goetz, Natalie Koutsoumanis, Kostas Mortensen, Alicja Ossendorp, Bernadette Martino, Laura Merten, Caroline Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Hardy, Anthony EFSA J Guidance Document Uncertainty analysis is the process of identifying limitations in scientific knowledge and evaluating their implications for scientific conclusions. It is therefore relevant in all EFSA's scientific assessments and also necessary, to ensure that the assessment conclusions provide reliable information for decision‐making. The form and extent of uncertainty analysis, and how the conclusions should be reported, vary widely depending on the nature and context of each assessment and the degree of uncertainty that is present. This document provides concise guidance on how to identify which options for uncertainty analysis are appropriate in each assessment, and how to apply them. It is accompanied by a separate, supporting opinion that explains the key concepts and principles behind this Guidance, and describes the methods in more detail. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7009727/ /pubmed/32625671 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5123 Text en © 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Guidance Document
Benford, Diane
Halldorsson, Thorhallur
Jeger, Michael John
Knutsen, Helle Katrine
More, Simon
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Noteborn, Hubert
Ockleford, Colin
Ricci, Antonia
Rychen, Guido
Schlatter, Josef R
Silano, Vittorio
Solecki, Roland
Turck, Dominique
Younes, Maged
Craig, Peter
Hart, Andrew
Von Goetz, Natalie
Koutsoumanis, Kostas
Mortensen, Alicja
Ossendorp, Bernadette
Martino, Laura
Merten, Caroline
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Hardy, Anthony
Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments
title Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments
title_full Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments
title_fullStr Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments
title_full_unstemmed Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments
title_short Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments
title_sort guidance on uncertainty analysis in scientific assessments
topic Guidance Document
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625671
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5123
work_keys_str_mv AT guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT benforddiane guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT halldorssonthorhallur guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT jegermichaeljohn guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT knutsenhellekatrine guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT moresimon guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT naegelihanspeter guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT notebornhubert guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT ocklefordcolin guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT ricciantonia guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT rychenguido guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT schlatterjosefr guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT silanovittorio guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT soleckiroland guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT turckdominique guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT younesmaged guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT craigpeter guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT hartandrew guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT vongoetznatalie guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT koutsoumaniskostas guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT mortensenalicja guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT ossendorpbernadette guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT martinolaura guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT mertencaroline guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT mosbachschulzolaf guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments
AT hardyanthony guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments