Cargando…
Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments
Uncertainty analysis is the process of identifying limitations in scientific knowledge and evaluating their implications for scientific conclusions. It is therefore relevant in all EFSA's scientific assessments and also necessary, to ensure that the assessment conclusions provide reliable infor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625671 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5123 |
_version_ | 1783495732395769856 |
---|---|
author | Benford, Diane Halldorsson, Thorhallur Jeger, Michael John Knutsen, Helle Katrine More, Simon Naegeli, Hanspeter Noteborn, Hubert Ockleford, Colin Ricci, Antonia Rychen, Guido Schlatter, Josef R Silano, Vittorio Solecki, Roland Turck, Dominique Younes, Maged Craig, Peter Hart, Andrew Von Goetz, Natalie Koutsoumanis, Kostas Mortensen, Alicja Ossendorp, Bernadette Martino, Laura Merten, Caroline Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Hardy, Anthony |
author_facet | Benford, Diane Halldorsson, Thorhallur Jeger, Michael John Knutsen, Helle Katrine More, Simon Naegeli, Hanspeter Noteborn, Hubert Ockleford, Colin Ricci, Antonia Rychen, Guido Schlatter, Josef R Silano, Vittorio Solecki, Roland Turck, Dominique Younes, Maged Craig, Peter Hart, Andrew Von Goetz, Natalie Koutsoumanis, Kostas Mortensen, Alicja Ossendorp, Bernadette Martino, Laura Merten, Caroline Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Hardy, Anthony |
collection | PubMed |
description | Uncertainty analysis is the process of identifying limitations in scientific knowledge and evaluating their implications for scientific conclusions. It is therefore relevant in all EFSA's scientific assessments and also necessary, to ensure that the assessment conclusions provide reliable information for decision‐making. The form and extent of uncertainty analysis, and how the conclusions should be reported, vary widely depending on the nature and context of each assessment and the degree of uncertainty that is present. This document provides concise guidance on how to identify which options for uncertainty analysis are appropriate in each assessment, and how to apply them. It is accompanied by a separate, supporting opinion that explains the key concepts and principles behind this Guidance, and describes the methods in more detail. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009727 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70097272020-07-02 Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments Benford, Diane Halldorsson, Thorhallur Jeger, Michael John Knutsen, Helle Katrine More, Simon Naegeli, Hanspeter Noteborn, Hubert Ockleford, Colin Ricci, Antonia Rychen, Guido Schlatter, Josef R Silano, Vittorio Solecki, Roland Turck, Dominique Younes, Maged Craig, Peter Hart, Andrew Von Goetz, Natalie Koutsoumanis, Kostas Mortensen, Alicja Ossendorp, Bernadette Martino, Laura Merten, Caroline Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Hardy, Anthony EFSA J Guidance Document Uncertainty analysis is the process of identifying limitations in scientific knowledge and evaluating their implications for scientific conclusions. It is therefore relevant in all EFSA's scientific assessments and also necessary, to ensure that the assessment conclusions provide reliable information for decision‐making. The form and extent of uncertainty analysis, and how the conclusions should be reported, vary widely depending on the nature and context of each assessment and the degree of uncertainty that is present. This document provides concise guidance on how to identify which options for uncertainty analysis are appropriate in each assessment, and how to apply them. It is accompanied by a separate, supporting opinion that explains the key concepts and principles behind this Guidance, and describes the methods in more detail. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7009727/ /pubmed/32625671 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5123 Text en © 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Guidance Document Benford, Diane Halldorsson, Thorhallur Jeger, Michael John Knutsen, Helle Katrine More, Simon Naegeli, Hanspeter Noteborn, Hubert Ockleford, Colin Ricci, Antonia Rychen, Guido Schlatter, Josef R Silano, Vittorio Solecki, Roland Turck, Dominique Younes, Maged Craig, Peter Hart, Andrew Von Goetz, Natalie Koutsoumanis, Kostas Mortensen, Alicja Ossendorp, Bernadette Martino, Laura Merten, Caroline Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Hardy, Anthony Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments |
title | Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments |
title_full | Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments |
title_fullStr | Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments |
title_full_unstemmed | Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments |
title_short | Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments |
title_sort | guidance on uncertainty analysis in scientific assessments |
topic | Guidance Document |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625671 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5123 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT benforddiane guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT halldorssonthorhallur guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT jegermichaeljohn guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT knutsenhellekatrine guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT moresimon guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT naegelihanspeter guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT notebornhubert guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT ocklefordcolin guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT ricciantonia guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT rychenguido guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT schlatterjosefr guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT silanovittorio guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT soleckiroland guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT turckdominique guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT younesmaged guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT craigpeter guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT hartandrew guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT vongoetznatalie guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT koutsoumaniskostas guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT mortensenalicja guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT ossendorpbernadette guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT martinolaura guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT mertencaroline guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT mosbachschulzolaf guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments AT hardyanthony guidanceonuncertaintyanalysisinscientificassessments |