Cargando…
Updated quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of the BSE risk posed by processed animal protein (PAP)
EFSA was requested: to assess the impact of a proposed quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) ‘technical zero’ on the limit of detection of official controls for constituents of ruminant origin in feed, to review and update the 2011 QRA, and to estimate the cattle bovine spongiform...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625957 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5314 |
_version_ | 1783495732629602304 |
---|---|
author | Ricci, Antonia Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert Fernández Escámez, Pablo Salvador Gironés, Rosina Herman, Lieve Koutsoumanis, Kostas Lindqvist, Roland Nørrung, Birgit Robertson, Lucy Ru, Giuseppe Sanaa, Moez Skandamis, Panagiotis Snary, Emma Speybroeck, Niko Kuile, Benno Ter Threlfall, John Wahlström, Helene Adkin, Amie Greiner, Matthias Marchis, Daniela Prado, Marta Da Silva Felicio, Teresa Ortiz‐Pelaez, Angel Simmons, Marion |
author_facet | Ricci, Antonia Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert Fernández Escámez, Pablo Salvador Gironés, Rosina Herman, Lieve Koutsoumanis, Kostas Lindqvist, Roland Nørrung, Birgit Robertson, Lucy Ru, Giuseppe Sanaa, Moez Skandamis, Panagiotis Snary, Emma Speybroeck, Niko Kuile, Benno Ter Threlfall, John Wahlström, Helene Adkin, Amie Greiner, Matthias Marchis, Daniela Prado, Marta Da Silva Felicio, Teresa Ortiz‐Pelaez, Angel Simmons, Marion |
collection | PubMed |
description | EFSA was requested: to assess the impact of a proposed quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) ‘technical zero’ on the limit of detection of official controls for constituents of ruminant origin in feed, to review and update the 2011 QRA, and to estimate the cattle bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) risk posed by the contamination of feed with BSE‐infected bovine‐derived processed animal protein (PAP), should pig PAP be re‐authorised in poultry feed and vice versa, using both light microscopy and ruminant qPCR methods, and action limits of 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300 DNA copies. The current qPCR cannot discriminate between legitimately added bovine material and unauthorised contamination, or determine if any detected ruminant material is associated with BSE infectivity. The sensitivity of the surveillance for the detection of material of ruminant origin in feed is currently limited due to the heterogeneous distribution of the material, practicalities of sampling and test performance. A ‘technical zero’ will further reduce it. The updated model estimated a total BSE infectivity four times lower than that estimated in 2011, with less than one new case of BSE expected to arise each year. In the hypothetical scenario of a whole carcass of an infected cow entering the feed chain without any removal of specified risk material (SRM) or reduction of BSE infectivity via rendering, up to four new cases of BSE could be expected at the upper 95th percentile. A second model estimated that at least half of the feed containing material of ruminant origin will not be detected or removed from the feed chain, if an interpretation cut‐off point of 100 DNA copies or more is applied. If the probability of a contaminated feed sample increased to 5%, with an interpretation cut‐off point of 300 DNA copies, there would be a fourfold increase in the proportion of all produced feed that is contaminated but not detected. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70097282020-07-02 Updated quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of the BSE risk posed by processed animal protein (PAP) Ricci, Antonia Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert Fernández Escámez, Pablo Salvador Gironés, Rosina Herman, Lieve Koutsoumanis, Kostas Lindqvist, Roland Nørrung, Birgit Robertson, Lucy Ru, Giuseppe Sanaa, Moez Skandamis, Panagiotis Snary, Emma Speybroeck, Niko Kuile, Benno Ter Threlfall, John Wahlström, Helene Adkin, Amie Greiner, Matthias Marchis, Daniela Prado, Marta Da Silva Felicio, Teresa Ortiz‐Pelaez, Angel Simmons, Marion EFSA J Scientific Opinion EFSA was requested: to assess the impact of a proposed quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) ‘technical zero’ on the limit of detection of official controls for constituents of ruminant origin in feed, to review and update the 2011 QRA, and to estimate the cattle bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) risk posed by the contamination of feed with BSE‐infected bovine‐derived processed animal protein (PAP), should pig PAP be re‐authorised in poultry feed and vice versa, using both light microscopy and ruminant qPCR methods, and action limits of 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300 DNA copies. The current qPCR cannot discriminate between legitimately added bovine material and unauthorised contamination, or determine if any detected ruminant material is associated with BSE infectivity. The sensitivity of the surveillance for the detection of material of ruminant origin in feed is currently limited due to the heterogeneous distribution of the material, practicalities of sampling and test performance. A ‘technical zero’ will further reduce it. The updated model estimated a total BSE infectivity four times lower than that estimated in 2011, with less than one new case of BSE expected to arise each year. In the hypothetical scenario of a whole carcass of an infected cow entering the feed chain without any removal of specified risk material (SRM) or reduction of BSE infectivity via rendering, up to four new cases of BSE could be expected at the upper 95th percentile. A second model estimated that at least half of the feed containing material of ruminant origin will not be detected or removed from the feed chain, if an interpretation cut‐off point of 100 DNA copies or more is applied. If the probability of a contaminated feed sample increased to 5%, with an interpretation cut‐off point of 300 DNA copies, there would be a fourfold increase in the proportion of all produced feed that is contaminated but not detected. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7009728/ /pubmed/32625957 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5314 Text en © 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Ricci, Antonia Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert Fernández Escámez, Pablo Salvador Gironés, Rosina Herman, Lieve Koutsoumanis, Kostas Lindqvist, Roland Nørrung, Birgit Robertson, Lucy Ru, Giuseppe Sanaa, Moez Skandamis, Panagiotis Snary, Emma Speybroeck, Niko Kuile, Benno Ter Threlfall, John Wahlström, Helene Adkin, Amie Greiner, Matthias Marchis, Daniela Prado, Marta Da Silva Felicio, Teresa Ortiz‐Pelaez, Angel Simmons, Marion Updated quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of the BSE risk posed by processed animal protein (PAP) |
title | Updated quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of the BSE risk posed by processed animal protein (PAP) |
title_full | Updated quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of the BSE risk posed by processed animal protein (PAP) |
title_fullStr | Updated quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of the BSE risk posed by processed animal protein (PAP) |
title_full_unstemmed | Updated quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of the BSE risk posed by processed animal protein (PAP) |
title_short | Updated quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of the BSE risk posed by processed animal protein (PAP) |
title_sort | updated quantitative risk assessment (qra) of the bse risk posed by processed animal protein (pap) |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625957 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5314 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT ricciantonia updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT allendeana updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT boltondeclan updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT chemalymarianne updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT daviesrobert updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT fernandezescamezpablosalvador updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT gironesrosina updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT hermanlieve updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT koutsoumaniskostas updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT lindqvistroland updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT nørrungbirgit updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT robertsonlucy updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT rugiuseppe updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT sanaamoez updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT skandamispanagiotis updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT snaryemma updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT speybroeckniko updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT kuilebennoter updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT threlfalljohn updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT wahlstromhelene updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT adkinamie updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT greinermatthias updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT marchisdaniela updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT pradomarta updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT dasilvafelicioteresa updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT ortizpelaezangel updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap AT simmonsmarion updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap |