Cargando…

Updated quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of the BSE risk posed by processed animal protein (PAP)

EFSA was requested: to assess the impact of a proposed quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) ‘technical zero’ on the limit of detection of official controls for constituents of ruminant origin in feed, to review and update the 2011 QRA, and to estimate the cattle bovine spongiform...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ricci, Antonia, Allende, Ana, Bolton, Declan, Chemaly, Marianne, Davies, Robert, Fernández Escámez, Pablo Salvador, Gironés, Rosina, Herman, Lieve, Koutsoumanis, Kostas, Lindqvist, Roland, Nørrung, Birgit, Robertson, Lucy, Ru, Giuseppe, Sanaa, Moez, Skandamis, Panagiotis, Snary, Emma, Speybroeck, Niko, Kuile, Benno Ter, Threlfall, John, Wahlström, Helene, Adkin, Amie, Greiner, Matthias, Marchis, Daniela, Prado, Marta, Da Silva Felicio, Teresa, Ortiz‐Pelaez, Angel, Simmons, Marion
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625957
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5314
_version_ 1783495732629602304
author Ricci, Antonia
Allende, Ana
Bolton, Declan
Chemaly, Marianne
Davies, Robert
Fernández Escámez, Pablo Salvador
Gironés, Rosina
Herman, Lieve
Koutsoumanis, Kostas
Lindqvist, Roland
Nørrung, Birgit
Robertson, Lucy
Ru, Giuseppe
Sanaa, Moez
Skandamis, Panagiotis
Snary, Emma
Speybroeck, Niko
Kuile, Benno Ter
Threlfall, John
Wahlström, Helene
Adkin, Amie
Greiner, Matthias
Marchis, Daniela
Prado, Marta
Da Silva Felicio, Teresa
Ortiz‐Pelaez, Angel
Simmons, Marion
author_facet Ricci, Antonia
Allende, Ana
Bolton, Declan
Chemaly, Marianne
Davies, Robert
Fernández Escámez, Pablo Salvador
Gironés, Rosina
Herman, Lieve
Koutsoumanis, Kostas
Lindqvist, Roland
Nørrung, Birgit
Robertson, Lucy
Ru, Giuseppe
Sanaa, Moez
Skandamis, Panagiotis
Snary, Emma
Speybroeck, Niko
Kuile, Benno Ter
Threlfall, John
Wahlström, Helene
Adkin, Amie
Greiner, Matthias
Marchis, Daniela
Prado, Marta
Da Silva Felicio, Teresa
Ortiz‐Pelaez, Angel
Simmons, Marion
collection PubMed
description EFSA was requested: to assess the impact of a proposed quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) ‘technical zero’ on the limit of detection of official controls for constituents of ruminant origin in feed, to review and update the 2011 QRA, and to estimate the cattle bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) risk posed by the contamination of feed with BSE‐infected bovine‐derived processed animal protein (PAP), should pig PAP be re‐authorised in poultry feed and vice versa, using both light microscopy and ruminant qPCR methods, and action limits of 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300 DNA copies. The current qPCR cannot discriminate between legitimately added bovine material and unauthorised contamination, or determine if any detected ruminant material is associated with BSE infectivity. The sensitivity of the surveillance for the detection of material of ruminant origin in feed is currently limited due to the heterogeneous distribution of the material, practicalities of sampling and test performance. A ‘technical zero’ will further reduce it. The updated model estimated a total BSE infectivity four times lower than that estimated in 2011, with less than one new case of BSE expected to arise each year. In the hypothetical scenario of a whole carcass of an infected cow entering the feed chain without any removal of specified risk material (SRM) or reduction of BSE infectivity via rendering, up to four new cases of BSE could be expected at the upper 95th percentile. A second model estimated that at least half of the feed containing material of ruminant origin will not be detected or removed from the feed chain, if an interpretation cut‐off point of 100 DNA copies or more is applied. If the probability of a contaminated feed sample increased to 5%, with an interpretation cut‐off point of 300 DNA copies, there would be a fourfold increase in the proportion of all produced feed that is contaminated but not detected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70097282020-07-02 Updated quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of the BSE risk posed by processed animal protein (PAP) Ricci, Antonia Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert Fernández Escámez, Pablo Salvador Gironés, Rosina Herman, Lieve Koutsoumanis, Kostas Lindqvist, Roland Nørrung, Birgit Robertson, Lucy Ru, Giuseppe Sanaa, Moez Skandamis, Panagiotis Snary, Emma Speybroeck, Niko Kuile, Benno Ter Threlfall, John Wahlström, Helene Adkin, Amie Greiner, Matthias Marchis, Daniela Prado, Marta Da Silva Felicio, Teresa Ortiz‐Pelaez, Angel Simmons, Marion EFSA J Scientific Opinion EFSA was requested: to assess the impact of a proposed quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) ‘technical zero’ on the limit of detection of official controls for constituents of ruminant origin in feed, to review and update the 2011 QRA, and to estimate the cattle bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) risk posed by the contamination of feed with BSE‐infected bovine‐derived processed animal protein (PAP), should pig PAP be re‐authorised in poultry feed and vice versa, using both light microscopy and ruminant qPCR methods, and action limits of 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300 DNA copies. The current qPCR cannot discriminate between legitimately added bovine material and unauthorised contamination, or determine if any detected ruminant material is associated with BSE infectivity. The sensitivity of the surveillance for the detection of material of ruminant origin in feed is currently limited due to the heterogeneous distribution of the material, practicalities of sampling and test performance. A ‘technical zero’ will further reduce it. The updated model estimated a total BSE infectivity four times lower than that estimated in 2011, with less than one new case of BSE expected to arise each year. In the hypothetical scenario of a whole carcass of an infected cow entering the feed chain without any removal of specified risk material (SRM) or reduction of BSE infectivity via rendering, up to four new cases of BSE could be expected at the upper 95th percentile. A second model estimated that at least half of the feed containing material of ruminant origin will not be detected or removed from the feed chain, if an interpretation cut‐off point of 100 DNA copies or more is applied. If the probability of a contaminated feed sample increased to 5%, with an interpretation cut‐off point of 300 DNA copies, there would be a fourfold increase in the proportion of all produced feed that is contaminated but not detected. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7009728/ /pubmed/32625957 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5314 Text en © 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Ricci, Antonia
Allende, Ana
Bolton, Declan
Chemaly, Marianne
Davies, Robert
Fernández Escámez, Pablo Salvador
Gironés, Rosina
Herman, Lieve
Koutsoumanis, Kostas
Lindqvist, Roland
Nørrung, Birgit
Robertson, Lucy
Ru, Giuseppe
Sanaa, Moez
Skandamis, Panagiotis
Snary, Emma
Speybroeck, Niko
Kuile, Benno Ter
Threlfall, John
Wahlström, Helene
Adkin, Amie
Greiner, Matthias
Marchis, Daniela
Prado, Marta
Da Silva Felicio, Teresa
Ortiz‐Pelaez, Angel
Simmons, Marion
Updated quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of the BSE risk posed by processed animal protein (PAP)
title Updated quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of the BSE risk posed by processed animal protein (PAP)
title_full Updated quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of the BSE risk posed by processed animal protein (PAP)
title_fullStr Updated quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of the BSE risk posed by processed animal protein (PAP)
title_full_unstemmed Updated quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of the BSE risk posed by processed animal protein (PAP)
title_short Updated quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of the BSE risk posed by processed animal protein (PAP)
title_sort updated quantitative risk assessment (qra) of the bse risk posed by processed animal protein (pap)
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625957
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5314
work_keys_str_mv AT updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT ricciantonia updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT allendeana updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT boltondeclan updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT chemalymarianne updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT daviesrobert updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT fernandezescamezpablosalvador updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT gironesrosina updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT hermanlieve updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT koutsoumaniskostas updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT lindqvistroland updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT nørrungbirgit updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT robertsonlucy updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT rugiuseppe updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT sanaamoez updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT skandamispanagiotis updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT snaryemma updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT speybroeckniko updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT kuilebennoter updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT threlfalljohn updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT wahlstromhelene updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT adkinamie updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT greinermatthias updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT marchisdaniela updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT pradomarta updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT dasilvafelicioteresa updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT ortizpelaezangel updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap
AT simmonsmarion updatedquantitativeriskassessmentqraofthebseriskposedbyprocessedanimalproteinpap