Cargando…
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance ethoprophos
The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State Italy and co‐rapporteur Member State Ireland for the pesticide active substance ethoprophos are reported. The context of the peer review was that...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
| Lenguaje: | English |
| Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625701 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5290 |
| _version_ | 1783495736149671936 |
|---|---|
| author | Arena, Maria Auteri, Domenica Barmaz, Stefania Brancato, Alba Brocca, Daniela Bura, Laszlo Carrasco Cabrera, Luis Chiusolo, Arianna Civitella, Consuelo Court Marques, Daniele Crivellente, Federica Ctverackova, Lucie De Lentdecker, Chloe Egsmose, Mark Erdos, Zoltan Fait, Gabriella Ferreira, Lucien Goumenou, Marina Greco, Luna Ippolito, Alessio Istace, Frederique Jarrah, Samira Kardassi, Dimitra Leuschner, Renata Lythgo, Christopher Magrans, José Oriol Medina, Paula Mineo, Desire Miron, Ileana Molnar, Tunde Padovani, Laura Parra Morte, Juan Manuel Pedersen, Ragnor Reich, Hermine Riemenschneider, Christina Sacchi, Angela Santos, Miguel Serafimova, Rositsa Sharp, Rachel Stanek, Alois Streissl, Franz Sturma, Juergen Szentes, Csaba Tarazona, José Terron, Andrea Theobald, Anne Vagenende, Benedicte Van Dijk, Joanke Villamar‐Bouza, Laura |
| author_facet | Arena, Maria Auteri, Domenica Barmaz, Stefania Brancato, Alba Brocca, Daniela Bura, Laszlo Carrasco Cabrera, Luis Chiusolo, Arianna Civitella, Consuelo Court Marques, Daniele Crivellente, Federica Ctverackova, Lucie De Lentdecker, Chloe Egsmose, Mark Erdos, Zoltan Fait, Gabriella Ferreira, Lucien Goumenou, Marina Greco, Luna Ippolito, Alessio Istace, Frederique Jarrah, Samira Kardassi, Dimitra Leuschner, Renata Lythgo, Christopher Magrans, José Oriol Medina, Paula Mineo, Desire Miron, Ileana Molnar, Tunde Padovani, Laura Parra Morte, Juan Manuel Pedersen, Ragnor Reich, Hermine Riemenschneider, Christina Sacchi, Angela Santos, Miguel Serafimova, Rositsa Sharp, Rachel Stanek, Alois Streissl, Franz Sturma, Juergen Szentes, Csaba Tarazona, José Terron, Andrea Theobald, Anne Vagenende, Benedicte Van Dijk, Joanke Villamar‐Bouza, Laura |
| collection | PubMed |
| description | The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State Italy and co‐rapporteur Member State Ireland for the pesticide active substance ethoprophos are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of ethoprophos as a nematicide and an insecticide on potatoes. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified. |
| format | Online Article Text |
| id | pubmed-7009744 |
| institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
| record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
| spelling | pubmed-70097442020-07-02 Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance ethoprophos Arena, Maria Auteri, Domenica Barmaz, Stefania Brancato, Alba Brocca, Daniela Bura, Laszlo Carrasco Cabrera, Luis Chiusolo, Arianna Civitella, Consuelo Court Marques, Daniele Crivellente, Federica Ctverackova, Lucie De Lentdecker, Chloe Egsmose, Mark Erdos, Zoltan Fait, Gabriella Ferreira, Lucien Goumenou, Marina Greco, Luna Ippolito, Alessio Istace, Frederique Jarrah, Samira Kardassi, Dimitra Leuschner, Renata Lythgo, Christopher Magrans, José Oriol Medina, Paula Mineo, Desire Miron, Ileana Molnar, Tunde Padovani, Laura Parra Morte, Juan Manuel Pedersen, Ragnor Reich, Hermine Riemenschneider, Christina Sacchi, Angela Santos, Miguel Serafimova, Rositsa Sharp, Rachel Stanek, Alois Streissl, Franz Sturma, Juergen Szentes, Csaba Tarazona, José Terron, Andrea Theobald, Anne Vagenende, Benedicte Van Dijk, Joanke Villamar‐Bouza, Laura EFSA J Conclusion on Pesticides Peer Review The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State Italy and co‐rapporteur Member State Ireland for the pesticide active substance ethoprophos are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of ethoprophos as a nematicide and an insecticide on potatoes. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7009744/ /pubmed/32625701 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5290 Text en © 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
| spellingShingle | Conclusion on Pesticides Peer Review Arena, Maria Auteri, Domenica Barmaz, Stefania Brancato, Alba Brocca, Daniela Bura, Laszlo Carrasco Cabrera, Luis Chiusolo, Arianna Civitella, Consuelo Court Marques, Daniele Crivellente, Federica Ctverackova, Lucie De Lentdecker, Chloe Egsmose, Mark Erdos, Zoltan Fait, Gabriella Ferreira, Lucien Goumenou, Marina Greco, Luna Ippolito, Alessio Istace, Frederique Jarrah, Samira Kardassi, Dimitra Leuschner, Renata Lythgo, Christopher Magrans, José Oriol Medina, Paula Mineo, Desire Miron, Ileana Molnar, Tunde Padovani, Laura Parra Morte, Juan Manuel Pedersen, Ragnor Reich, Hermine Riemenschneider, Christina Sacchi, Angela Santos, Miguel Serafimova, Rositsa Sharp, Rachel Stanek, Alois Streissl, Franz Sturma, Juergen Szentes, Csaba Tarazona, José Terron, Andrea Theobald, Anne Vagenende, Benedicte Van Dijk, Joanke Villamar‐Bouza, Laura Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance ethoprophos |
| title | Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance ethoprophos |
| title_full | Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance ethoprophos |
| title_fullStr | Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance ethoprophos |
| title_full_unstemmed | Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance ethoprophos |
| title_short | Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance ethoprophos |
| title_sort | peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance ethoprophos |
| topic | Conclusion on Pesticides Peer Review |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625701 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5290 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT arenamaria peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT auteridomenica peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT barmazstefania peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT brancatoalba peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT broccadaniela peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT buralaszlo peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT carrascocabreraluis peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT chiusoloarianna peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT civitellaconsuelo peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT courtmarquesdaniele peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT crivellentefederica peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT ctverackovalucie peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT delentdeckerchloe peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT egsmosemark peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT erdoszoltan peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT faitgabriella peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT ferreiralucien peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT goumenoumarina peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT grecoluna peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT ippolitoalessio peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT istacefrederique peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT jarrahsamira peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT kardassidimitra peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT leuschnerrenata peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT lythgochristopher peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT magransjoseoriol peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT medinapaula peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT mineodesire peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT mironileana peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT molnartunde peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT padovanilaura peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT parramortejuanmanuel peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT pedersenragnor peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT reichhermine peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT riemenschneiderchristina peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT sacchiangela peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT santosmiguel peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT serafimovarositsa peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT sharprachel peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT stanekalois peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT streisslfranz peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT sturmajuergen peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT szentescsaba peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT tarazonajose peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT terronandrea peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT theobaldanne peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT vagenendebenedicte peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT vandijkjoanke peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos AT villamarbouzalaura peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceethoprophos |