Cargando…
Evaluation of the Application for new alternative biodiesel production process for rendered fat of Cat 1 (BDI‐RepCat process, AT)
A new alternative method for the production of biodiesel from rendered fat of all categories of animal by‐products was assessed. The process was compared to the approved biodiesel production process described in Chapter IV Section 2 D of Annex IV of Commission Regulation (EU) 142/2011. Tallow derive...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625346 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5053 |
_version_ | 1783495743850414080 |
---|---|
author | Ricci, Antonia Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert Girones, Rosina Herman, Lieve Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Lindqvist, Roland Nørrung, Birgit Robertson, Lucy Ru, Giuseppe Sanaa, Moez Simmons, Marion Skandamis, Panagiotis Snary, Emma Speybroeck, Niko Ter Kuile, Benno Threlfall, John Wahlström, Helene Alvarez Ordoñez, Avelino Griffin, John Spiropoulos, John Vanopdenbosch, Emmanuel Correia, Sandra Fernández Escámez, Pablo Salvador |
author_facet | Ricci, Antonia Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert Girones, Rosina Herman, Lieve Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Lindqvist, Roland Nørrung, Birgit Robertson, Lucy Ru, Giuseppe Sanaa, Moez Simmons, Marion Skandamis, Panagiotis Snary, Emma Speybroeck, Niko Ter Kuile, Benno Threlfall, John Wahlström, Helene Alvarez Ordoñez, Avelino Griffin, John Spiropoulos, John Vanopdenbosch, Emmanuel Correia, Sandra Fernández Escámez, Pablo Salvador |
collection | PubMed |
description | A new alternative method for the production of biodiesel from rendered fat of all categories of animal by‐products was assessed. The process was compared to the approved biodiesel production process described in Chapter IV Section 2 D of Annex IV of Commission Regulation (EU) 142/2011. Tallow derived from Category 1 material is treated according to Method 1 from the same Regulation (133°C, 20 min, 3 bar) and subsequently mixed with 15% methanol, heated to reaction temperature (220°C) in several heat exchangers and transferred into the continuous conversion reactor by means of a high pressure pump (80 bar) for 30 min. In the conversion phase, there is an exposure to methanol in the absence of alkaline or acidic conditions. The impact of this procedure on the thermostability of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) has not been assessed in the literature. After the reaction, the biodiesel/glycerol mixture is distilled under vacuum at a minimum temperature of 150°C and a maximum pressure of 10 mbar, which is equivalent to the distillation step in the approved biodiesel production process, for which a 3 log(10) reduction factor in PrP27–30 was obtained. Therefore, a similar level of TSE infectivity reduction could be expected for that phase of the method. A previous EFSA Opinion established that a reduction of 6 log(10) in TSE infectivity should be achieved by any proposed alternative method in order to be equivalent to the approved processing method. This level of reduction has not been shown with experimental trials run under conditions equivalent to the ones described for the RepCat process. It was not possible to conclude whether or not the level of TSE infectivity reduction in the RepCat process is at least of 6 log(10). Therefore, it was also not possible to conclude about the equivalence with the approved biodiesel production process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009799 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70097992020-07-02 Evaluation of the Application for new alternative biodiesel production process for rendered fat of Cat 1 (BDI‐RepCat process, AT) Ricci, Antonia Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert Girones, Rosina Herman, Lieve Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Lindqvist, Roland Nørrung, Birgit Robertson, Lucy Ru, Giuseppe Sanaa, Moez Simmons, Marion Skandamis, Panagiotis Snary, Emma Speybroeck, Niko Ter Kuile, Benno Threlfall, John Wahlström, Helene Alvarez Ordoñez, Avelino Griffin, John Spiropoulos, John Vanopdenbosch, Emmanuel Correia, Sandra Fernández Escámez, Pablo Salvador EFSA J Scientific Opinion A new alternative method for the production of biodiesel from rendered fat of all categories of animal by‐products was assessed. The process was compared to the approved biodiesel production process described in Chapter IV Section 2 D of Annex IV of Commission Regulation (EU) 142/2011. Tallow derived from Category 1 material is treated according to Method 1 from the same Regulation (133°C, 20 min, 3 bar) and subsequently mixed with 15% methanol, heated to reaction temperature (220°C) in several heat exchangers and transferred into the continuous conversion reactor by means of a high pressure pump (80 bar) for 30 min. In the conversion phase, there is an exposure to methanol in the absence of alkaline or acidic conditions. The impact of this procedure on the thermostability of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) has not been assessed in the literature. After the reaction, the biodiesel/glycerol mixture is distilled under vacuum at a minimum temperature of 150°C and a maximum pressure of 10 mbar, which is equivalent to the distillation step in the approved biodiesel production process, for which a 3 log(10) reduction factor in PrP27–30 was obtained. Therefore, a similar level of TSE infectivity reduction could be expected for that phase of the method. A previous EFSA Opinion established that a reduction of 6 log(10) in TSE infectivity should be achieved by any proposed alternative method in order to be equivalent to the approved processing method. This level of reduction has not been shown with experimental trials run under conditions equivalent to the ones described for the RepCat process. It was not possible to conclude whether or not the level of TSE infectivity reduction in the RepCat process is at least of 6 log(10). Therefore, it was also not possible to conclude about the equivalence with the approved biodiesel production process. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7009799/ /pubmed/32625346 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5053 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Ricci, Antonia Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert Girones, Rosina Herman, Lieve Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Lindqvist, Roland Nørrung, Birgit Robertson, Lucy Ru, Giuseppe Sanaa, Moez Simmons, Marion Skandamis, Panagiotis Snary, Emma Speybroeck, Niko Ter Kuile, Benno Threlfall, John Wahlström, Helene Alvarez Ordoñez, Avelino Griffin, John Spiropoulos, John Vanopdenbosch, Emmanuel Correia, Sandra Fernández Escámez, Pablo Salvador Evaluation of the Application for new alternative biodiesel production process for rendered fat of Cat 1 (BDI‐RepCat process, AT) |
title | Evaluation of the Application for new alternative biodiesel production process for rendered fat of Cat 1 (BDI‐RepCat process, AT) |
title_full | Evaluation of the Application for new alternative biodiesel production process for rendered fat of Cat 1 (BDI‐RepCat process, AT) |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Application for new alternative biodiesel production process for rendered fat of Cat 1 (BDI‐RepCat process, AT) |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Application for new alternative biodiesel production process for rendered fat of Cat 1 (BDI‐RepCat process, AT) |
title_short | Evaluation of the Application for new alternative biodiesel production process for rendered fat of Cat 1 (BDI‐RepCat process, AT) |
title_sort | evaluation of the application for new alternative biodiesel production process for rendered fat of cat 1 (bdi‐repcat process, at) |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625346 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5053 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT ricciantonia evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT allendeana evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT boltondeclan evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT chemalymarianne evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT daviesrobert evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT gironesrosina evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT hermanlieve evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT koutsoumaniskonstantinos evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT lindqvistroland evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT nørrungbirgit evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT robertsonlucy evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT rugiuseppe evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT sanaamoez evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT simmonsmarion evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT skandamispanagiotis evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT snaryemma evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT speybroeckniko evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT terkuilebenno evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT threlfalljohn evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT wahlstromhelene evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT alvarezordonezavelino evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT griffinjohn evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT spiropoulosjohn evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT vanopdenboschemmanuel evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT correiasandra evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat AT fernandezescamezpablosalvador evaluationoftheapplicationfornewalternativebiodieselproductionprocessforrenderedfatofcat1bdirepcatprocessat |