Cargando…
Assessment of genetically modified sugar beet H7‐1 for renewal of authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐006)
Following the submission of application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐006 under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from KWS SAAT SE and Monsanto Company, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority (GMO Panel) was asked to deliver a scientific risk assessment on the data submitted in t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625354 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5065 |
_version_ | 1783495746210758656 |
---|---|
author | Naegeli, Hanspeter Birch, Andrew Nicholas Casacuberta, Josep De Schrijver, Adinda Gralak, Mikołaj Antoni Guerche, Philippe Jones, Huw Manachini, Barbara Messéan, Antoine Nielsen, Elsa Ebbesen Nogué, Fabien Robaglia, Christophe Rostoks, Nils Sweet, Jeremy Tebbe, Christoph Visioli, Francesco Wal, Jean‐Michel Fernandez‐Dumont, Antonio Gennaro, Andrea Ramon, Matthew |
author_facet | Naegeli, Hanspeter Birch, Andrew Nicholas Casacuberta, Josep De Schrijver, Adinda Gralak, Mikołaj Antoni Guerche, Philippe Jones, Huw Manachini, Barbara Messéan, Antoine Nielsen, Elsa Ebbesen Nogué, Fabien Robaglia, Christophe Rostoks, Nils Sweet, Jeremy Tebbe, Christoph Visioli, Francesco Wal, Jean‐Michel Fernandez‐Dumont, Antonio Gennaro, Andrea Ramon, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Following the submission of application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐006 under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from KWS SAAT SE and Monsanto Company, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority (GMO Panel) was asked to deliver a scientific risk assessment on the data submitted in the context of the renewal of authorisation application for the herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified sugar beet H7‐1. The data received in the context of this renewal application contained a systematic search and evaluation of literature, updated bioinformatics analyses and additional documents or studies performed by or on behalf of the applicant. The GMO Panel assessed these data for possible new hazards, modified exposure or new scientific uncertainties identified during the authorisation period and not previously assessed in the context of the original application. Under the assumption that the DNA sequence of the event in sugar beet H7‐1 considered for renewal is identical to the originally assessed event, the GMO Panel concludes that there is no evidence in the context of this renewal application for new hazards, modified exposure or scientific uncertainties that would change the conclusions of the original risk assessment on sugar beet H7‐1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009809 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70098092020-07-02 Assessment of genetically modified sugar beet H7‐1 for renewal of authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐006) Naegeli, Hanspeter Birch, Andrew Nicholas Casacuberta, Josep De Schrijver, Adinda Gralak, Mikołaj Antoni Guerche, Philippe Jones, Huw Manachini, Barbara Messéan, Antoine Nielsen, Elsa Ebbesen Nogué, Fabien Robaglia, Christophe Rostoks, Nils Sweet, Jeremy Tebbe, Christoph Visioli, Francesco Wal, Jean‐Michel Fernandez‐Dumont, Antonio Gennaro, Andrea Ramon, Matthew EFSA J Scientific Opinion Following the submission of application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐006 under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from KWS SAAT SE and Monsanto Company, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority (GMO Panel) was asked to deliver a scientific risk assessment on the data submitted in the context of the renewal of authorisation application for the herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified sugar beet H7‐1. The data received in the context of this renewal application contained a systematic search and evaluation of literature, updated bioinformatics analyses and additional documents or studies performed by or on behalf of the applicant. The GMO Panel assessed these data for possible new hazards, modified exposure or new scientific uncertainties identified during the authorisation period and not previously assessed in the context of the original application. Under the assumption that the DNA sequence of the event in sugar beet H7‐1 considered for renewal is identical to the originally assessed event, the GMO Panel concludes that there is no evidence in the context of this renewal application for new hazards, modified exposure or scientific uncertainties that would change the conclusions of the original risk assessment on sugar beet H7‐1. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7009809/ /pubmed/32625354 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5065 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Naegeli, Hanspeter Birch, Andrew Nicholas Casacuberta, Josep De Schrijver, Adinda Gralak, Mikołaj Antoni Guerche, Philippe Jones, Huw Manachini, Barbara Messéan, Antoine Nielsen, Elsa Ebbesen Nogué, Fabien Robaglia, Christophe Rostoks, Nils Sweet, Jeremy Tebbe, Christoph Visioli, Francesco Wal, Jean‐Michel Fernandez‐Dumont, Antonio Gennaro, Andrea Ramon, Matthew Assessment of genetically modified sugar beet H7‐1 for renewal of authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐006) |
title | Assessment of genetically modified sugar beet H7‐1 for renewal of authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐006) |
title_full | Assessment of genetically modified sugar beet H7‐1 for renewal of authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐006) |
title_fullStr | Assessment of genetically modified sugar beet H7‐1 for renewal of authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐006) |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of genetically modified sugar beet H7‐1 for renewal of authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐006) |
title_short | Assessment of genetically modified sugar beet H7‐1 for renewal of authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐006) |
title_sort | assessment of genetically modified sugar beet h7‐1 for renewal of authorisation under regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 (application efsa‐gmo‐rx‐006) |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625354 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsugarbeeth71forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx006 AT naegelihanspeter assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsugarbeeth71forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx006 AT birchandrewnicholas assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsugarbeeth71forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx006 AT casacubertajosep assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsugarbeeth71forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx006 AT deschrijveradinda assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsugarbeeth71forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx006 AT gralakmikołajantoni assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsugarbeeth71forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx006 AT guerchephilippe assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsugarbeeth71forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx006 AT joneshuw assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsugarbeeth71forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx006 AT manachinibarbara assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsugarbeeth71forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx006 AT messeanantoine assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsugarbeeth71forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx006 AT nielsenelsaebbesen assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsugarbeeth71forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx006 AT noguefabien assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsugarbeeth71forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx006 AT robagliachristophe assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsugarbeeth71forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx006 AT rostoksnils assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsugarbeeth71forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx006 AT sweetjeremy assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsugarbeeth71forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx006 AT tebbechristoph assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsugarbeeth71forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx006 AT visiolifrancesco assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsugarbeeth71forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx006 AT waljeanmichel assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsugarbeeth71forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx006 AT fernandezdumontantonio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsugarbeeth71forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx006 AT gennaroandrea assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsugarbeeth71forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx006 AT ramonmatthew assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedsugarbeeth71forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx006 |