Cargando…

Scientific Opinion on application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2013‐118 for authorisation of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 and subcombinations independently of their origin, for food and feed uses, import and processing submitted under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 by Monsanto Company

In this opinion, the GMO Panel assessed the five‐event stack maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 ×1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 and its 25 subcombinations, independently of their origin. The GMO Panel has previously assessed the five single events combined to produce this five‐event stack maize and 11 subcombina...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naegeli, Hanspeter, Birch, Andrew Nicholas, Casacuberta, Josep, De Schrijver, Adinda, Gralak, Mikołaj Antoni, Guerche, Philippe, Jones, Huw, Manachini, Barbara, Messéan, Antoine, Nielsen, Elsa Ebbesen, Nogué, Fabien, Robaglia, Christophe, Rostoks, Nils, Sweet, Jeremy, Tebbe, Christoph, Visioli, Francesco, Wal, Jean‐Michel, Álvarez, Fernando, Lanzoni, Anna, Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625612
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4921
_version_ 1783495757220806656
author Naegeli, Hanspeter
Birch, Andrew Nicholas
Casacuberta, Josep
De Schrijver, Adinda
Gralak, Mikołaj Antoni
Guerche, Philippe
Jones, Huw
Manachini, Barbara
Messéan, Antoine
Nielsen, Elsa Ebbesen
Nogué, Fabien
Robaglia, Christophe
Rostoks, Nils
Sweet, Jeremy
Tebbe, Christoph
Visioli, Francesco
Wal, Jean‐Michel
Álvarez, Fernando
Lanzoni, Anna
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
author_facet Naegeli, Hanspeter
Birch, Andrew Nicholas
Casacuberta, Josep
De Schrijver, Adinda
Gralak, Mikołaj Antoni
Guerche, Philippe
Jones, Huw
Manachini, Barbara
Messéan, Antoine
Nielsen, Elsa Ebbesen
Nogué, Fabien
Robaglia, Christophe
Rostoks, Nils
Sweet, Jeremy
Tebbe, Christoph
Visioli, Francesco
Wal, Jean‐Michel
Álvarez, Fernando
Lanzoni, Anna
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
collection PubMed
description In this opinion, the GMO Panel assessed the five‐event stack maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 ×1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 and its 25 subcombinations, independently of their origin. The GMO Panel has previously assessed the five single events combined to produce this five‐event stack maize and 11 subcombinations of these events and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single events or their previously assessed subcombinations, leading to modification of the original conclusions were identified. The combination of the single events and of the newly expressed proteins in the five‐event stack maize did not give rise to issues – based on the molecular, agronomic/phenotypic or compositional characteristics – regarding food and feed safety and nutrition. Considering the scope of this application, the known biological function of the newly expressed proteins and the data available for the five‐event stack maize and its previously assessed maize subcombinations, the GMO Panel considered that different combinations of the single events would not raise environmental concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the five‐event stack maize is as safe and as nutritious as the non‐genetically modified (GM) comparator and the tested non‐GM reference varieties in the context of its scope. For the 14 maize subcombinations for which no experimental data were provided, the GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events, and concluded that their combinations would not raise safety concerns. These maize subcombinations are therefore expected to be as safe as the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and maize MON 87427 ×MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122. Since the post‐market environmental monitoring plan for the five‐event stack maize does not include any provisions for the 14 maize subcombinations not previously assessed, the GMO Panel recommended the applicant to revise the plan accordingly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70098562020-07-02 Scientific Opinion on application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2013‐118 for authorisation of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 and subcombinations independently of their origin, for food and feed uses, import and processing submitted under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 by Monsanto Company Naegeli, Hanspeter Birch, Andrew Nicholas Casacuberta, Josep De Schrijver, Adinda Gralak, Mikołaj Antoni Guerche, Philippe Jones, Huw Manachini, Barbara Messéan, Antoine Nielsen, Elsa Ebbesen Nogué, Fabien Robaglia, Christophe Rostoks, Nils Sweet, Jeremy Tebbe, Christoph Visioli, Francesco Wal, Jean‐Michel Álvarez, Fernando Lanzoni, Anna Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos EFSA J Scientific Opinion In this opinion, the GMO Panel assessed the five‐event stack maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 ×1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 and its 25 subcombinations, independently of their origin. The GMO Panel has previously assessed the five single events combined to produce this five‐event stack maize and 11 subcombinations of these events and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single events or their previously assessed subcombinations, leading to modification of the original conclusions were identified. The combination of the single events and of the newly expressed proteins in the five‐event stack maize did not give rise to issues – based on the molecular, agronomic/phenotypic or compositional characteristics – regarding food and feed safety and nutrition. Considering the scope of this application, the known biological function of the newly expressed proteins and the data available for the five‐event stack maize and its previously assessed maize subcombinations, the GMO Panel considered that different combinations of the single events would not raise environmental concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the five‐event stack maize is as safe and as nutritious as the non‐genetically modified (GM) comparator and the tested non‐GM reference varieties in the context of its scope. For the 14 maize subcombinations for which no experimental data were provided, the GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events, and concluded that their combinations would not raise safety concerns. These maize subcombinations are therefore expected to be as safe as the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and maize MON 87427 ×MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122. Since the post‐market environmental monitoring plan for the five‐event stack maize does not include any provisions for the 14 maize subcombinations not previously assessed, the GMO Panel recommended the applicant to revise the plan accordingly. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7009856/ /pubmed/32625612 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4921 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Birch, Andrew Nicholas
Casacuberta, Josep
De Schrijver, Adinda
Gralak, Mikołaj Antoni
Guerche, Philippe
Jones, Huw
Manachini, Barbara
Messéan, Antoine
Nielsen, Elsa Ebbesen
Nogué, Fabien
Robaglia, Christophe
Rostoks, Nils
Sweet, Jeremy
Tebbe, Christoph
Visioli, Francesco
Wal, Jean‐Michel
Álvarez, Fernando
Lanzoni, Anna
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Scientific Opinion on application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2013‐118 for authorisation of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 and subcombinations independently of their origin, for food and feed uses, import and processing submitted under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 by Monsanto Company
title Scientific Opinion on application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2013‐118 for authorisation of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 and subcombinations independently of their origin, for food and feed uses, import and processing submitted under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 by Monsanto Company
title_full Scientific Opinion on application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2013‐118 for authorisation of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 and subcombinations independently of their origin, for food and feed uses, import and processing submitted under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 by Monsanto Company
title_fullStr Scientific Opinion on application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2013‐118 for authorisation of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 and subcombinations independently of their origin, for food and feed uses, import and processing submitted under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 by Monsanto Company
title_full_unstemmed Scientific Opinion on application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2013‐118 for authorisation of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 and subcombinations independently of their origin, for food and feed uses, import and processing submitted under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 by Monsanto Company
title_short Scientific Opinion on application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2013‐118 for authorisation of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 and subcombinations independently of their origin, for food and feed uses, import and processing submitted under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 by Monsanto Company
title_sort scientific opinion on application efsa‐gmo‐be‐2013‐118 for authorisation of genetically modified maize mon 87427 × mon 89034 × 1507 × mon 88017 × 59122 and subcombinations independently of their origin, for food and feed uses, import and processing submitted under regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 by monsanto company
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625612
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4921
work_keys_str_mv AT scientificopiniononapplicationefsagmobe2013118forauthorisationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon890341507mon8801759122andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingsubmittedunderregulationecno18292003bymonsantocompany
AT naegelihanspeter scientificopiniononapplicationefsagmobe2013118forauthorisationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon890341507mon8801759122andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingsubmittedunderregulationecno18292003bymonsantocompany
AT birchandrewnicholas scientificopiniononapplicationefsagmobe2013118forauthorisationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon890341507mon8801759122andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingsubmittedunderregulationecno18292003bymonsantocompany
AT casacubertajosep scientificopiniononapplicationefsagmobe2013118forauthorisationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon890341507mon8801759122andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingsubmittedunderregulationecno18292003bymonsantocompany
AT deschrijveradinda scientificopiniononapplicationefsagmobe2013118forauthorisationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon890341507mon8801759122andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingsubmittedunderregulationecno18292003bymonsantocompany
AT gralakmikołajantoni scientificopiniononapplicationefsagmobe2013118forauthorisationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon890341507mon8801759122andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingsubmittedunderregulationecno18292003bymonsantocompany
AT guerchephilippe scientificopiniononapplicationefsagmobe2013118forauthorisationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon890341507mon8801759122andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingsubmittedunderregulationecno18292003bymonsantocompany
AT joneshuw scientificopiniononapplicationefsagmobe2013118forauthorisationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon890341507mon8801759122andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingsubmittedunderregulationecno18292003bymonsantocompany
AT manachinibarbara scientificopiniononapplicationefsagmobe2013118forauthorisationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon890341507mon8801759122andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingsubmittedunderregulationecno18292003bymonsantocompany
AT messeanantoine scientificopiniononapplicationefsagmobe2013118forauthorisationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon890341507mon8801759122andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingsubmittedunderregulationecno18292003bymonsantocompany
AT nielsenelsaebbesen scientificopiniononapplicationefsagmobe2013118forauthorisationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon890341507mon8801759122andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingsubmittedunderregulationecno18292003bymonsantocompany
AT noguefabien scientificopiniononapplicationefsagmobe2013118forauthorisationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon890341507mon8801759122andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingsubmittedunderregulationecno18292003bymonsantocompany
AT robagliachristophe scientificopiniononapplicationefsagmobe2013118forauthorisationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon890341507mon8801759122andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingsubmittedunderregulationecno18292003bymonsantocompany
AT rostoksnils scientificopiniononapplicationefsagmobe2013118forauthorisationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon890341507mon8801759122andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingsubmittedunderregulationecno18292003bymonsantocompany
AT sweetjeremy scientificopiniononapplicationefsagmobe2013118forauthorisationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon890341507mon8801759122andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingsubmittedunderregulationecno18292003bymonsantocompany
AT tebbechristoph scientificopiniononapplicationefsagmobe2013118forauthorisationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon890341507mon8801759122andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingsubmittedunderregulationecno18292003bymonsantocompany
AT visiolifrancesco scientificopiniononapplicationefsagmobe2013118forauthorisationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon890341507mon8801759122andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingsubmittedunderregulationecno18292003bymonsantocompany
AT waljeanmichel scientificopiniononapplicationefsagmobe2013118forauthorisationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon890341507mon8801759122andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingsubmittedunderregulationecno18292003bymonsantocompany
AT alvarezfernando scientificopiniononapplicationefsagmobe2013118forauthorisationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon890341507mon8801759122andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingsubmittedunderregulationecno18292003bymonsantocompany
AT lanzonianna scientificopiniononapplicationefsagmobe2013118forauthorisationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon890341507mon8801759122andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingsubmittedunderregulationecno18292003bymonsantocompany
AT paraskevopouloskonstantinos scientificopiniononapplicationefsagmobe2013118forauthorisationofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon890341507mon8801759122andsubcombinationsindependentlyoftheiroriginforfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingsubmittedunderregulationecno18292003bymonsantocompany