Cargando…
Pest categorisation of naturally‐spreading psorosis
The EFSA Panel on Plant Health performed a pest categorisation of naturally‐spreading psorosis of citrus for the European Union. Naturally‐spreading psorosis is poorly defined, because the status of both the disease and its causal agent(s) is uncertain. However, Citrus psorosis virus (CPsV) is a wel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625361 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5076 |
_version_ | 1783495764045987840 |
---|---|
author | Jeger, Michael Bragard, Claude Caffier, David Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina Gilioli, Gianni Gregoire, Jean‐Claude Jaques Miret, Josep Anton MacLeod, Alan Navajas Navarro, Maria Niere, Björn Parnell, Stephen Potting, Roel Rafoss, Trond Rossi, Vittorio Urek, Gregor Van Bruggen, Ariena Van der Werf, Wopke West, Jonathan Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet Winter, Stephan Catara, Antonino Duran‐Vila, Nuria Hollo, Gabor Candresse, Thierry |
author_facet | Jeger, Michael Bragard, Claude Caffier, David Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina Gilioli, Gianni Gregoire, Jean‐Claude Jaques Miret, Josep Anton MacLeod, Alan Navajas Navarro, Maria Niere, Björn Parnell, Stephen Potting, Roel Rafoss, Trond Rossi, Vittorio Urek, Gregor Van Bruggen, Ariena Van der Werf, Wopke West, Jonathan Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet Winter, Stephan Catara, Antonino Duran‐Vila, Nuria Hollo, Gabor Candresse, Thierry |
collection | PubMed |
description | The EFSA Panel on Plant Health performed a pest categorisation of naturally‐spreading psorosis of citrus for the European Union. Naturally‐spreading psorosis is poorly defined, because the status of both the disease and its causal agent(s) is uncertain. However, Citrus psorosis virus (CPsV) is a well‐ characterised Ophiovirus that is systematically associated with the psorosis disease and therefore considered to be its causal agent. Efficient diagnostics are available for CPsV. It is present in at least three EU MS. Naturally‐spreading psorosis is currently regulated by Directive 2000/29/EC, while CPsV is not explicitly mentioned in this Directive. CPsV has the potential to enter, establish and spread in the EU territory. However, the main pathway for entry is closed by the existing legislation so that entry is only possible through minor alternative pathways. Plants for planting are the major means of spread while there are uncertainties on the existence and efficiency of a natural spread mechanism. CPsV introduction and spread in the EU would have negative consequences on the EU citrus industry. Of the criteria evaluated by EFSA to qualify as a Union quarantine pest or as a Union regulated non‐quarantine pest (RNQP), Naturally‐spreading psorosis does not meet the criterion of being a well characterised pest or disease. As it is not explicitly mentioned in the legislation, it is unclear whether CPsV meets the criterion of being currently regulated or under official control. It meets, however, all the RNQP criteria. The key uncertainties of this categorisation concern: (1) the causal role of CPsV in the psorosis disease as well as elements of its biology and epidemiology, (2) the exact nature of the Naturally‐spreading psorosis syndrome and the identity of its causal agent and, consequently, (3) whether CPsV should be considered as being covered by the current legislation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009885 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70098852020-07-02 Pest categorisation of naturally‐spreading psorosis Jeger, Michael Bragard, Claude Caffier, David Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina Gilioli, Gianni Gregoire, Jean‐Claude Jaques Miret, Josep Anton MacLeod, Alan Navajas Navarro, Maria Niere, Björn Parnell, Stephen Potting, Roel Rafoss, Trond Rossi, Vittorio Urek, Gregor Van Bruggen, Ariena Van der Werf, Wopke West, Jonathan Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet Winter, Stephan Catara, Antonino Duran‐Vila, Nuria Hollo, Gabor Candresse, Thierry EFSA J Scientfic Opinion The EFSA Panel on Plant Health performed a pest categorisation of naturally‐spreading psorosis of citrus for the European Union. Naturally‐spreading psorosis is poorly defined, because the status of both the disease and its causal agent(s) is uncertain. However, Citrus psorosis virus (CPsV) is a well‐ characterised Ophiovirus that is systematically associated with the psorosis disease and therefore considered to be its causal agent. Efficient diagnostics are available for CPsV. It is present in at least three EU MS. Naturally‐spreading psorosis is currently regulated by Directive 2000/29/EC, while CPsV is not explicitly mentioned in this Directive. CPsV has the potential to enter, establish and spread in the EU territory. However, the main pathway for entry is closed by the existing legislation so that entry is only possible through minor alternative pathways. Plants for planting are the major means of spread while there are uncertainties on the existence and efficiency of a natural spread mechanism. CPsV introduction and spread in the EU would have negative consequences on the EU citrus industry. Of the criteria evaluated by EFSA to qualify as a Union quarantine pest or as a Union regulated non‐quarantine pest (RNQP), Naturally‐spreading psorosis does not meet the criterion of being a well characterised pest or disease. As it is not explicitly mentioned in the legislation, it is unclear whether CPsV meets the criterion of being currently regulated or under official control. It meets, however, all the RNQP criteria. The key uncertainties of this categorisation concern: (1) the causal role of CPsV in the psorosis disease as well as elements of its biology and epidemiology, (2) the exact nature of the Naturally‐spreading psorosis syndrome and the identity of its causal agent and, consequently, (3) whether CPsV should be considered as being covered by the current legislation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7009885/ /pubmed/32625361 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5076 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientfic Opinion Jeger, Michael Bragard, Claude Caffier, David Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina Gilioli, Gianni Gregoire, Jean‐Claude Jaques Miret, Josep Anton MacLeod, Alan Navajas Navarro, Maria Niere, Björn Parnell, Stephen Potting, Roel Rafoss, Trond Rossi, Vittorio Urek, Gregor Van Bruggen, Ariena Van der Werf, Wopke West, Jonathan Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet Winter, Stephan Catara, Antonino Duran‐Vila, Nuria Hollo, Gabor Candresse, Thierry Pest categorisation of naturally‐spreading psorosis |
title | Pest categorisation of naturally‐spreading psorosis |
title_full | Pest categorisation of naturally‐spreading psorosis |
title_fullStr | Pest categorisation of naturally‐spreading psorosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Pest categorisation of naturally‐spreading psorosis |
title_short | Pest categorisation of naturally‐spreading psorosis |
title_sort | pest categorisation of naturally‐spreading psorosis |
topic | Scientfic Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625361 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5076 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT jegermichael pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT bragardclaude pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT caffierdavid pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT dehnenschmutzkatharina pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT gilioligianni pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT gregoirejeanclaude pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT jaquesmiretjosepanton pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT macleodalan pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT navajasnavarromaria pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT nierebjorn pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT parnellstephen pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT pottingroel pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT rafosstrond pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT rossivittorio pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT urekgregor pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT vanbruggenariena pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT vanderwerfwopke pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT westjonathan pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT chatzivassiliouelisavet pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT winterstephan pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT cataraantonino pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT duranvilanuria pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT hollogabor pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis AT candressethierry pestcategorisationofnaturallyspreadingpsorosis |