Cargando…
Re‐evaluation of xanthan gum (E 415) as a food additive
The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of xanthan gum (E 415) as food additive. Following the conceptual framework for the risk assessment of certain food additives re‐evaluated under Commission Regulation (EU) No 2...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625570 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4909 |
_version_ | 1783495764547207168 |
---|---|
author | Mortensen, Alicja Aguilar, Fernando Crebelli, Riccardo Di Domenico, Alessandro Frutos, Maria Jose Galtier, Pierre Gott, David Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Lambré, Claude Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Lindtner, Oliver Moldeus, Peter Mosesso, Pasquale Oskarsson, Agneta Parent‐Massin, Dominique Stankovic, Ivan Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius Wright, Matthew Younes, Maged Brimer, Leon Christodoulidou, Anna Lodi, Federica Gelgelova, Petra Dusemund, Birgit |
author_facet | Mortensen, Alicja Aguilar, Fernando Crebelli, Riccardo Di Domenico, Alessandro Frutos, Maria Jose Galtier, Pierre Gott, David Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Lambré, Claude Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Lindtner, Oliver Moldeus, Peter Mosesso, Pasquale Oskarsson, Agneta Parent‐Massin, Dominique Stankovic, Ivan Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius Wright, Matthew Younes, Maged Brimer, Leon Christodoulidou, Anna Lodi, Federica Gelgelova, Petra Dusemund, Birgit |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of xanthan gum (E 415) as food additive. Following the conceptual framework for the risk assessment of certain food additives re‐evaluated under Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010, the Panel considered that adequate exposure and toxicity data were available. Based on the reported use levels, a refined exposure of up to 64 mg/kg bw per day in children for the general population, 38 mg/kg bw per day for children consumers only of food supplements at the high level exposure and 115 mg/kg bw per day for infants consuming foods for special medical purposes and special formulae (FSMPs), were estimated. Xanthan gum (E 415) is unlikely to be absorbed intact and is expected to be fermented by intestinal microbiota. No adverse effects were reported at the highest doses tested in chronic and carcinogenicity studies and there is no concern with respect to the genotoxicity. Repeated oral intake by adults of xanthan gum up to 214 mg/kg bw per day for ten days was well tolerated, but some individuals experienced abdominal discomfort, an undesirable but not adverse effect. The Panel concluded that there is no need for a numerical ADI for xanthan gum (E 415), and that there is no safety concern for the general population at the refined exposure assessment of xanthan gum (E 415) as food additive. Considering the outcome of clinical studies and post‐marketing surveillance, the Panel concluded that there is no safety concern from the use of xanthan gum (E 415) in FSMPs for infants and young children at concentrations reported by the food industry. The current re‐evaluation of xanthan gum (E 415) as a food additive is not considered to be applicable for infants under the age of 12 weeks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009887 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70098872020-07-02 Re‐evaluation of xanthan gum (E 415) as a food additive Mortensen, Alicja Aguilar, Fernando Crebelli, Riccardo Di Domenico, Alessandro Frutos, Maria Jose Galtier, Pierre Gott, David Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Lambré, Claude Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Lindtner, Oliver Moldeus, Peter Mosesso, Pasquale Oskarsson, Agneta Parent‐Massin, Dominique Stankovic, Ivan Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius Wright, Matthew Younes, Maged Brimer, Leon Christodoulidou, Anna Lodi, Federica Gelgelova, Petra Dusemund, Birgit EFSA J Scientific Opinion The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of xanthan gum (E 415) as food additive. Following the conceptual framework for the risk assessment of certain food additives re‐evaluated under Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010, the Panel considered that adequate exposure and toxicity data were available. Based on the reported use levels, a refined exposure of up to 64 mg/kg bw per day in children for the general population, 38 mg/kg bw per day for children consumers only of food supplements at the high level exposure and 115 mg/kg bw per day for infants consuming foods for special medical purposes and special formulae (FSMPs), were estimated. Xanthan gum (E 415) is unlikely to be absorbed intact and is expected to be fermented by intestinal microbiota. No adverse effects were reported at the highest doses tested in chronic and carcinogenicity studies and there is no concern with respect to the genotoxicity. Repeated oral intake by adults of xanthan gum up to 214 mg/kg bw per day for ten days was well tolerated, but some individuals experienced abdominal discomfort, an undesirable but not adverse effect. The Panel concluded that there is no need for a numerical ADI for xanthan gum (E 415), and that there is no safety concern for the general population at the refined exposure assessment of xanthan gum (E 415) as food additive. Considering the outcome of clinical studies and post‐marketing surveillance, the Panel concluded that there is no safety concern from the use of xanthan gum (E 415) in FSMPs for infants and young children at concentrations reported by the food industry. The current re‐evaluation of xanthan gum (E 415) as a food additive is not considered to be applicable for infants under the age of 12 weeks. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7009887/ /pubmed/32625570 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4909 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Mortensen, Alicja Aguilar, Fernando Crebelli, Riccardo Di Domenico, Alessandro Frutos, Maria Jose Galtier, Pierre Gott, David Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Lambré, Claude Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Lindtner, Oliver Moldeus, Peter Mosesso, Pasquale Oskarsson, Agneta Parent‐Massin, Dominique Stankovic, Ivan Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius Wright, Matthew Younes, Maged Brimer, Leon Christodoulidou, Anna Lodi, Federica Gelgelova, Petra Dusemund, Birgit Re‐evaluation of xanthan gum (E 415) as a food additive |
title | Re‐evaluation of xanthan gum (E 415) as a food additive |
title_full | Re‐evaluation of xanthan gum (E 415) as a food additive |
title_fullStr | Re‐evaluation of xanthan gum (E 415) as a food additive |
title_full_unstemmed | Re‐evaluation of xanthan gum (E 415) as a food additive |
title_short | Re‐evaluation of xanthan gum (E 415) as a food additive |
title_sort | re‐evaluation of xanthan gum (e 415) as a food additive |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625570 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4909 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT mortensenalicja reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT aguilarfernando reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT crebelliriccardo reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT didomenicoalessandro reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT frutosmariajose reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT galtierpierre reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT gottdavid reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT gundertremyursula reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT lambreclaude reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT leblancjeancharles reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT lindtneroliver reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT moldeuspeter reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT mosessopasquale reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT oskarssonagneta reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT parentmassindominique reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT stankovicivan reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT waalkensberendsenine reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT woutersenrudolfantonius reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT wrightmatthew reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT younesmaged reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT brimerleon reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT christodoulidouanna reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT lodifederica reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT gelgelovapetra reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive AT dusemundbirgit reevaluationofxanthangume415asafoodadditive |