Cargando…
_version_ 1783495765949153280
author Hardy, Anthony
Benford, Diane
Halldorsson, Thorhallur
Jeger, Michael John
Knutsen, Helle Katrine
More, Simon
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Noteborn, Hubert
Ockleford, Colin
Ricci, Antonia
Rychen, Guido
Schlatter, Josef R
Silano, Vittorio
Solecki, Roland
Turck, Dominique
Benfenati, Emilio
Chaudhry, Qasim Mohammad
Craig, Peter
Frampton, Geoff
Greiner, Matthias
Hart, Andrew
Hogstrand, Christer
Lambre, Claude
Luttik, Robert
Makowski, David
Siani, Alfonso
Wahlstroem, Helene
Aguilera, Jaime
Dorne, Jean‐Lou
Fernandez Dumont, Antonio
Hempen, Michaela
Valtueña Martínez, Silvia
Martino, Laura
Smeraldi, Camilla
Terron, Andrea
Georgiadis, Nikolaos
Younes, Maged
author_facet Hardy, Anthony
Benford, Diane
Halldorsson, Thorhallur
Jeger, Michael John
Knutsen, Helle Katrine
More, Simon
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Noteborn, Hubert
Ockleford, Colin
Ricci, Antonia
Rychen, Guido
Schlatter, Josef R
Silano, Vittorio
Solecki, Roland
Turck, Dominique
Benfenati, Emilio
Chaudhry, Qasim Mohammad
Craig, Peter
Frampton, Geoff
Greiner, Matthias
Hart, Andrew
Hogstrand, Christer
Lambre, Claude
Luttik, Robert
Makowski, David
Siani, Alfonso
Wahlstroem, Helene
Aguilera, Jaime
Dorne, Jean‐Lou
Fernandez Dumont, Antonio
Hempen, Michaela
Valtueña Martínez, Silvia
Martino, Laura
Smeraldi, Camilla
Terron, Andrea
Georgiadis, Nikolaos
Younes, Maged
collection PubMed
description EFSA requested the Scientific Committee to develop a guidance document on the use of the weight of evidence approach in scientific assessments for use in all areas under EFSA's remit. The guidance document addresses the use of weight of evidence approaches in scientific assessments using both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Several case studies covering the various areas under EFSA's remit are annexed to the guidance document to illustrate the applicability of the proposed approach. Weight of evidence assessment is defined in this guidance as a process in which evidence is integrated to determine the relative support for possible answers to a question. This document considers the weight of evidence assessment as comprising three basic steps: (1) assembling the evidence into lines of evidence of similar type, (2) weighing the evidence, (3) integrating the evidence. The present document identifies reliability, relevance and consistency as three basic considerations for weighing evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70098932020-07-02 Guidance on the use of the weight of evidence approach in scientific assessments Hardy, Anthony Benford, Diane Halldorsson, Thorhallur Jeger, Michael John Knutsen, Helle Katrine More, Simon Naegeli, Hanspeter Noteborn, Hubert Ockleford, Colin Ricci, Antonia Rychen, Guido Schlatter, Josef R Silano, Vittorio Solecki, Roland Turck, Dominique Benfenati, Emilio Chaudhry, Qasim Mohammad Craig, Peter Frampton, Geoff Greiner, Matthias Hart, Andrew Hogstrand, Christer Lambre, Claude Luttik, Robert Makowski, David Siani, Alfonso Wahlstroem, Helene Aguilera, Jaime Dorne, Jean‐Lou Fernandez Dumont, Antonio Hempen, Michaela Valtueña Martínez, Silvia Martino, Laura Smeraldi, Camilla Terron, Andrea Georgiadis, Nikolaos Younes, Maged EFSA J Scientific Opinion EFSA requested the Scientific Committee to develop a guidance document on the use of the weight of evidence approach in scientific assessments for use in all areas under EFSA's remit. The guidance document addresses the use of weight of evidence approaches in scientific assessments using both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Several case studies covering the various areas under EFSA's remit are annexed to the guidance document to illustrate the applicability of the proposed approach. Weight of evidence assessment is defined in this guidance as a process in which evidence is integrated to determine the relative support for possible answers to a question. This document considers the weight of evidence assessment as comprising three basic steps: (1) assembling the evidence into lines of evidence of similar type, (2) weighing the evidence, (3) integrating the evidence. The present document identifies reliability, relevance and consistency as three basic considerations for weighing evidence. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7009893/ /pubmed/32625632 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4971 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Hardy, Anthony
Benford, Diane
Halldorsson, Thorhallur
Jeger, Michael John
Knutsen, Helle Katrine
More, Simon
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Noteborn, Hubert
Ockleford, Colin
Ricci, Antonia
Rychen, Guido
Schlatter, Josef R
Silano, Vittorio
Solecki, Roland
Turck, Dominique
Benfenati, Emilio
Chaudhry, Qasim Mohammad
Craig, Peter
Frampton, Geoff
Greiner, Matthias
Hart, Andrew
Hogstrand, Christer
Lambre, Claude
Luttik, Robert
Makowski, David
Siani, Alfonso
Wahlstroem, Helene
Aguilera, Jaime
Dorne, Jean‐Lou
Fernandez Dumont, Antonio
Hempen, Michaela
Valtueña Martínez, Silvia
Martino, Laura
Smeraldi, Camilla
Terron, Andrea
Georgiadis, Nikolaos
Younes, Maged
Guidance on the use of the weight of evidence approach in scientific assessments
title Guidance on the use of the weight of evidence approach in scientific assessments
title_full Guidance on the use of the weight of evidence approach in scientific assessments
title_fullStr Guidance on the use of the weight of evidence approach in scientific assessments
title_full_unstemmed Guidance on the use of the weight of evidence approach in scientific assessments
title_short Guidance on the use of the weight of evidence approach in scientific assessments
title_sort guidance on the use of the weight of evidence approach in scientific assessments
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625632
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4971
work_keys_str_mv AT guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT hardyanthony guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT benforddiane guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT halldorssonthorhallur guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT jegermichaeljohn guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT knutsenhellekatrine guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT moresimon guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT naegelihanspeter guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT notebornhubert guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT ocklefordcolin guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT ricciantonia guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT rychenguido guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT schlatterjosefr guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT silanovittorio guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT soleckiroland guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT turckdominique guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT benfenatiemilio guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT chaudhryqasimmohammad guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT craigpeter guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT framptongeoff guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT greinermatthias guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT hartandrew guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT hogstrandchrister guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT lambreclaude guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT luttikrobert guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT makowskidavid guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT sianialfonso guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT wahlstroemhelene guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT aguilerajaime guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT dornejeanlou guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT fernandezdumontantonio guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT hempenmichaela guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT valtuenamartinezsilvia guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT martinolaura guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT smeraldicamilla guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT terronandrea guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT georgiadisnikolaos guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments
AT younesmaged guidanceontheuseoftheweightofevidenceapproachinscientificassessments