Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 29024 as a silage additive for all animal species
Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of a strain of Lactobacillus plantarum when used as a technological additive intended...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625265 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4675 |
_version_ | 1783495769898090496 |
---|---|
author | Rychen, Guido Aquilina, Gabriele Azimonti, Giovanna Bampidis, Vasileios Bastos, Maria De Lourdes Bories, Georges Chesson, Andrew Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Flachowsky, Gerhard Gropp, Jürgen Kolar, Boris Kouba, Maryline López Puente, Secundino López‐Alonso, Marta Mantovani, Alberto Ramos, Fernando Villa, Roberto Edoardo Wallace, Robert John Wester, Pieter Brozzi, Rosella Saarela, Maria |
author_facet | Rychen, Guido Aquilina, Gabriele Azimonti, Giovanna Bampidis, Vasileios Bastos, Maria De Lourdes Bories, Georges Chesson, Andrew Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Flachowsky, Gerhard Gropp, Jürgen Kolar, Boris Kouba, Maryline López Puente, Secundino López‐Alonso, Marta Mantovani, Alberto Ramos, Fernando Villa, Roberto Edoardo Wallace, Robert John Wester, Pieter Brozzi, Rosella Saarela, Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of a strain of Lactobacillus plantarum when used as a technological additive intended to improve the ensiling process at a minimum proposed dose of 5.0 × 10(7) colony‐forming units (CFU)/kg fresh material. The bacterial species L. plantarum is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety approach to safety assessment. As the identity of the strain has been clearly established and as no antibiotic resistance of concern was detected, the use of the strain as a silage additive is considered safe for livestock species, for consumers of products from animals fed the treated silage and for the environment. In the absence of data, no conclusion can be drawn on the skin and eye irritancy or skin sensitisation of the additive. The additive should be considered as a potential respiratory sensitiser. Seven studies with laboratory‐scale silos were made using samples of forage of differing dry matter and water‐soluble carbohydrate content. In each case, replicate silos containing treated forage were compared with identical silos containing the same but untreated forage. The results showed that the additive has the potential to improve the production of silage from easy and moderately difficult to ensile forage species by reducing the pH and increasing lactic acid concentration and protein preservation. This was shown at the proposed application rate of 5 × 10(7) CFU/kg forage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009910 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70099102020-07-02 Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 29024 as a silage additive for all animal species Rychen, Guido Aquilina, Gabriele Azimonti, Giovanna Bampidis, Vasileios Bastos, Maria De Lourdes Bories, Georges Chesson, Andrew Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Flachowsky, Gerhard Gropp, Jürgen Kolar, Boris Kouba, Maryline López Puente, Secundino López‐Alonso, Marta Mantovani, Alberto Ramos, Fernando Villa, Roberto Edoardo Wallace, Robert John Wester, Pieter Brozzi, Rosella Saarela, Maria EFSA J Scientific Opinion Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of a strain of Lactobacillus plantarum when used as a technological additive intended to improve the ensiling process at a minimum proposed dose of 5.0 × 10(7) colony‐forming units (CFU)/kg fresh material. The bacterial species L. plantarum is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety approach to safety assessment. As the identity of the strain has been clearly established and as no antibiotic resistance of concern was detected, the use of the strain as a silage additive is considered safe for livestock species, for consumers of products from animals fed the treated silage and for the environment. In the absence of data, no conclusion can be drawn on the skin and eye irritancy or skin sensitisation of the additive. The additive should be considered as a potential respiratory sensitiser. Seven studies with laboratory‐scale silos were made using samples of forage of differing dry matter and water‐soluble carbohydrate content. In each case, replicate silos containing treated forage were compared with identical silos containing the same but untreated forage. The results showed that the additive has the potential to improve the production of silage from easy and moderately difficult to ensile forage species by reducing the pH and increasing lactic acid concentration and protein preservation. This was shown at the proposed application rate of 5 × 10(7) CFU/kg forage. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7009910/ /pubmed/32625265 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4675 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Rychen, Guido Aquilina, Gabriele Azimonti, Giovanna Bampidis, Vasileios Bastos, Maria De Lourdes Bories, Georges Chesson, Andrew Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Flachowsky, Gerhard Gropp, Jürgen Kolar, Boris Kouba, Maryline López Puente, Secundino López‐Alonso, Marta Mantovani, Alberto Ramos, Fernando Villa, Roberto Edoardo Wallace, Robert John Wester, Pieter Brozzi, Rosella Saarela, Maria Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 29024 as a silage additive for all animal species |
title | Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 29024 as a silage additive for all animal species |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 29024 as a silage additive for all animal species |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 29024 as a silage additive for all animal species |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 29024 as a silage additive for all animal species |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 29024 as a silage additive for all animal species |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of lactobacillus plantarum dsm 29024 as a silage additive for all animal species |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625265 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4675 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusplantarumdsm29024asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT rychenguido safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusplantarumdsm29024asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT aquilinagabriele safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusplantarumdsm29024asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT azimontigiovanna safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusplantarumdsm29024asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT bampidisvasileios safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusplantarumdsm29024asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT bastosmariadelourdes safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusplantarumdsm29024asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT boriesgeorges safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusplantarumdsm29024asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT chessonandrew safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusplantarumdsm29024asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusplantarumdsm29024asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT flachowskygerhard safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusplantarumdsm29024asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT groppjurgen safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusplantarumdsm29024asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT kolarboris safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusplantarumdsm29024asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT koubamaryline safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusplantarumdsm29024asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT lopezpuentesecundino safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusplantarumdsm29024asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT lopezalonsomarta safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusplantarumdsm29024asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT mantovanialberto safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusplantarumdsm29024asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT ramosfernando safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusplantarumdsm29024asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT villarobertoedoardo safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusplantarumdsm29024asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT wallacerobertjohn safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusplantarumdsm29024asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT westerpieter safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusplantarumdsm29024asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT brozzirosella safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusplantarumdsm29024asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT saarelamaria safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusplantarumdsm29024asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies |