Cargando…

Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses)

This scientific opinion addresses animal welfare aspects of slaughtering of livestock pregnant animals. Term of Reference (ToR) 1 requested assessment of the prevalence of animals slaughtered in a critical developmental stage of gestation when the livestock fetuses might experience negative affect....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: More, Simon, Bicout, Dominique, Botner, Anette, Butterworth, Andrew, Calistri, Paolo, Depner, Klaus, Edwards, Sandra, Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno, Good, Margaret, Gortazar Schmidt, Christian, Michel, Virginie, Miranda, Miguel Angel, Saxmose Nielsen, Søren, Velarde, Antonio, Thulke, Hans‐Hermann, Sihvonen, Liisa, Spoolder, Hans, Stegeman, Jan Arend, Raj, Mohan, Willeberg, Preben, Candiani, Denise, Winckler, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625488
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4782
_version_ 1783495770122485760
author More, Simon
Bicout, Dominique
Botner, Anette
Butterworth, Andrew
Calistri, Paolo
Depner, Klaus
Edwards, Sandra
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Good, Margaret
Gortazar Schmidt, Christian
Michel, Virginie
Miranda, Miguel Angel
Saxmose Nielsen, Søren
Velarde, Antonio
Thulke, Hans‐Hermann
Sihvonen, Liisa
Spoolder, Hans
Stegeman, Jan Arend
Raj, Mohan
Willeberg, Preben
Candiani, Denise
Winckler, Christoph
author_facet More, Simon
Bicout, Dominique
Botner, Anette
Butterworth, Andrew
Calistri, Paolo
Depner, Klaus
Edwards, Sandra
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Good, Margaret
Gortazar Schmidt, Christian
Michel, Virginie
Miranda, Miguel Angel
Saxmose Nielsen, Søren
Velarde, Antonio
Thulke, Hans‐Hermann
Sihvonen, Liisa
Spoolder, Hans
Stegeman, Jan Arend
Raj, Mohan
Willeberg, Preben
Candiani, Denise
Winckler, Christoph
collection PubMed
description This scientific opinion addresses animal welfare aspects of slaughtering of livestock pregnant animals. Term of Reference (ToR) 1 requested assessment of the prevalence of animals slaughtered in a critical developmental stage of gestation when the livestock fetuses might experience negative affect. Limited data on European prevalence and related uncertainties necessitated a structured expert knowledge elicitation (EKE) exercise. Estimated median percentages of animals slaughtered in the last third of gestation are 3%, 1.5%, 0.5%, 0.8% and 0.2% (dairy cows, beef cattle, pigs, sheep and goats, respectively). Pregnant animals may be sent for slaughter for health, welfare, management and economic reasons (ToR2); there are also reasons for farmers not knowing that animals sent for slaughter are pregnant. Measures to reduce the incidence are listed. ToR3 asked whether livestock fetuses can experience pain and other negative affect. The available literature was reviewed and, at a second multidisciplinary EKE meeting, judgements and uncertainty were elicited. It is concluded that livestock fetuses in the last third of gestation have the anatomical and neurophysiological structures required to experience negative affect (with 90–100% likelihood). However, there are two different possibilities whether they perceive negative affect. It is more probable that the neurophysiological situation does not allow for conscious perception (with 66–99% likelihood) because of brain inhibitory mechanisms. There is also a less probable situation that livestock fetuses can experience negative affect (with 1–33% likelihood) arising from differences in the interpretation of the fetal electroencephalogram, observed responses to external stimuli and the possibility of fetal learning. Regarding methods to stun and kill livestock fetuses at slaughter (ToR4), sets of scenarios and respective actions take account of both the probable and less probable situation regarding fetal ability for conscious perception. Finally, information was collated on methods to establish the dam's gestational stage based on physical features of livestock fetuses (ToR5).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70099112020-07-02 Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses) More, Simon Bicout, Dominique Botner, Anette Butterworth, Andrew Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Edwards, Sandra Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Good, Margaret Gortazar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda, Miguel Angel Saxmose Nielsen, Søren Velarde, Antonio Thulke, Hans‐Hermann Sihvonen, Liisa Spoolder, Hans Stegeman, Jan Arend Raj, Mohan Willeberg, Preben Candiani, Denise Winckler, Christoph EFSA J Scientific Opinion This scientific opinion addresses animal welfare aspects of slaughtering of livestock pregnant animals. Term of Reference (ToR) 1 requested assessment of the prevalence of animals slaughtered in a critical developmental stage of gestation when the livestock fetuses might experience negative affect. Limited data on European prevalence and related uncertainties necessitated a structured expert knowledge elicitation (EKE) exercise. Estimated median percentages of animals slaughtered in the last third of gestation are 3%, 1.5%, 0.5%, 0.8% and 0.2% (dairy cows, beef cattle, pigs, sheep and goats, respectively). Pregnant animals may be sent for slaughter for health, welfare, management and economic reasons (ToR2); there are also reasons for farmers not knowing that animals sent for slaughter are pregnant. Measures to reduce the incidence are listed. ToR3 asked whether livestock fetuses can experience pain and other negative affect. The available literature was reviewed and, at a second multidisciplinary EKE meeting, judgements and uncertainty were elicited. It is concluded that livestock fetuses in the last third of gestation have the anatomical and neurophysiological structures required to experience negative affect (with 90–100% likelihood). However, there are two different possibilities whether they perceive negative affect. It is more probable that the neurophysiological situation does not allow for conscious perception (with 66–99% likelihood) because of brain inhibitory mechanisms. There is also a less probable situation that livestock fetuses can experience negative affect (with 1–33% likelihood) arising from differences in the interpretation of the fetal electroencephalogram, observed responses to external stimuli and the possibility of fetal learning. Regarding methods to stun and kill livestock fetuses at slaughter (ToR4), sets of scenarios and respective actions take account of both the probable and less probable situation regarding fetal ability for conscious perception. Finally, information was collated on methods to establish the dam's gestational stage based on physical features of livestock fetuses (ToR5). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7009911/ /pubmed/32625488 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4782 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
More, Simon
Bicout, Dominique
Botner, Anette
Butterworth, Andrew
Calistri, Paolo
Depner, Klaus
Edwards, Sandra
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Good, Margaret
Gortazar Schmidt, Christian
Michel, Virginie
Miranda, Miguel Angel
Saxmose Nielsen, Søren
Velarde, Antonio
Thulke, Hans‐Hermann
Sihvonen, Liisa
Spoolder, Hans
Stegeman, Jan Arend
Raj, Mohan
Willeberg, Preben
Candiani, Denise
Winckler, Christoph
Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses)
title Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses)
title_full Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses)
title_fullStr Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses)
title_full_unstemmed Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses)
title_short Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses)
title_sort animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses)
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625488
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4782
work_keys_str_mv AT animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses
AT moresimon animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses
AT bicoutdominique animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses
AT botneranette animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses
AT butterworthandrew animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses
AT calistripaolo animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses
AT depnerklaus animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses
AT edwardssandra animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses
AT garinbastujibruno animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses
AT goodmargaret animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses
AT gortazarschmidtchristian animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses
AT michelvirginie animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses
AT mirandamiguelangel animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses
AT saxmosenielsensøren animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses
AT velardeantonio animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses
AT thulkehanshermann animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses
AT sihvonenliisa animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses
AT spoolderhans animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses
AT stegemanjanarend animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses
AT rajmohan animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses
AT willebergpreben animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses
AT candianidenise animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses
AT wincklerchristoph animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses