Cargando…
Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses)
This scientific opinion addresses animal welfare aspects of slaughtering of livestock pregnant animals. Term of Reference (ToR) 1 requested assessment of the prevalence of animals slaughtered in a critical developmental stage of gestation when the livestock fetuses might experience negative affect....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625488 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4782 |
_version_ | 1783495770122485760 |
---|---|
author | More, Simon Bicout, Dominique Botner, Anette Butterworth, Andrew Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Edwards, Sandra Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Good, Margaret Gortazar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda, Miguel Angel Saxmose Nielsen, Søren Velarde, Antonio Thulke, Hans‐Hermann Sihvonen, Liisa Spoolder, Hans Stegeman, Jan Arend Raj, Mohan Willeberg, Preben Candiani, Denise Winckler, Christoph |
author_facet | More, Simon Bicout, Dominique Botner, Anette Butterworth, Andrew Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Edwards, Sandra Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Good, Margaret Gortazar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda, Miguel Angel Saxmose Nielsen, Søren Velarde, Antonio Thulke, Hans‐Hermann Sihvonen, Liisa Spoolder, Hans Stegeman, Jan Arend Raj, Mohan Willeberg, Preben Candiani, Denise Winckler, Christoph |
collection | PubMed |
description | This scientific opinion addresses animal welfare aspects of slaughtering of livestock pregnant animals. Term of Reference (ToR) 1 requested assessment of the prevalence of animals slaughtered in a critical developmental stage of gestation when the livestock fetuses might experience negative affect. Limited data on European prevalence and related uncertainties necessitated a structured expert knowledge elicitation (EKE) exercise. Estimated median percentages of animals slaughtered in the last third of gestation are 3%, 1.5%, 0.5%, 0.8% and 0.2% (dairy cows, beef cattle, pigs, sheep and goats, respectively). Pregnant animals may be sent for slaughter for health, welfare, management and economic reasons (ToR2); there are also reasons for farmers not knowing that animals sent for slaughter are pregnant. Measures to reduce the incidence are listed. ToR3 asked whether livestock fetuses can experience pain and other negative affect. The available literature was reviewed and, at a second multidisciplinary EKE meeting, judgements and uncertainty were elicited. It is concluded that livestock fetuses in the last third of gestation have the anatomical and neurophysiological structures required to experience negative affect (with 90–100% likelihood). However, there are two different possibilities whether they perceive negative affect. It is more probable that the neurophysiological situation does not allow for conscious perception (with 66–99% likelihood) because of brain inhibitory mechanisms. There is also a less probable situation that livestock fetuses can experience negative affect (with 1–33% likelihood) arising from differences in the interpretation of the fetal electroencephalogram, observed responses to external stimuli and the possibility of fetal learning. Regarding methods to stun and kill livestock fetuses at slaughter (ToR4), sets of scenarios and respective actions take account of both the probable and less probable situation regarding fetal ability for conscious perception. Finally, information was collated on methods to establish the dam's gestational stage based on physical features of livestock fetuses (ToR5). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009911 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70099112020-07-02 Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses) More, Simon Bicout, Dominique Botner, Anette Butterworth, Andrew Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Edwards, Sandra Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Good, Margaret Gortazar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda, Miguel Angel Saxmose Nielsen, Søren Velarde, Antonio Thulke, Hans‐Hermann Sihvonen, Liisa Spoolder, Hans Stegeman, Jan Arend Raj, Mohan Willeberg, Preben Candiani, Denise Winckler, Christoph EFSA J Scientific Opinion This scientific opinion addresses animal welfare aspects of slaughtering of livestock pregnant animals. Term of Reference (ToR) 1 requested assessment of the prevalence of animals slaughtered in a critical developmental stage of gestation when the livestock fetuses might experience negative affect. Limited data on European prevalence and related uncertainties necessitated a structured expert knowledge elicitation (EKE) exercise. Estimated median percentages of animals slaughtered in the last third of gestation are 3%, 1.5%, 0.5%, 0.8% and 0.2% (dairy cows, beef cattle, pigs, sheep and goats, respectively). Pregnant animals may be sent for slaughter for health, welfare, management and economic reasons (ToR2); there are also reasons for farmers not knowing that animals sent for slaughter are pregnant. Measures to reduce the incidence are listed. ToR3 asked whether livestock fetuses can experience pain and other negative affect. The available literature was reviewed and, at a second multidisciplinary EKE meeting, judgements and uncertainty were elicited. It is concluded that livestock fetuses in the last third of gestation have the anatomical and neurophysiological structures required to experience negative affect (with 90–100% likelihood). However, there are two different possibilities whether they perceive negative affect. It is more probable that the neurophysiological situation does not allow for conscious perception (with 66–99% likelihood) because of brain inhibitory mechanisms. There is also a less probable situation that livestock fetuses can experience negative affect (with 1–33% likelihood) arising from differences in the interpretation of the fetal electroencephalogram, observed responses to external stimuli and the possibility of fetal learning. Regarding methods to stun and kill livestock fetuses at slaughter (ToR4), sets of scenarios and respective actions take account of both the probable and less probable situation regarding fetal ability for conscious perception. Finally, information was collated on methods to establish the dam's gestational stage based on physical features of livestock fetuses (ToR5). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7009911/ /pubmed/32625488 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4782 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion More, Simon Bicout, Dominique Botner, Anette Butterworth, Andrew Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Edwards, Sandra Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Good, Margaret Gortazar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda, Miguel Angel Saxmose Nielsen, Søren Velarde, Antonio Thulke, Hans‐Hermann Sihvonen, Liisa Spoolder, Hans Stegeman, Jan Arend Raj, Mohan Willeberg, Preben Candiani, Denise Winckler, Christoph Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses) |
title | Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses) |
title_full | Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses) |
title_fullStr | Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses) |
title_full_unstemmed | Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses) |
title_short | Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses) |
title_sort | animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses) |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625488 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4782 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses AT moresimon animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses AT bicoutdominique animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses AT botneranette animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses AT butterworthandrew animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses AT calistripaolo animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses AT depnerklaus animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses AT edwardssandra animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses AT garinbastujibruno animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses AT goodmargaret animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses AT gortazarschmidtchristian animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses AT michelvirginie animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses AT mirandamiguelangel animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses AT saxmosenielsensøren animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses AT velardeantonio animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses AT thulkehanshermann animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses AT sihvonenliisa animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses AT spoolderhans animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses AT stegemanjanarend animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses AT rajmohan animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses AT willebergpreben animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses AT candianidenise animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses AT wincklerchristoph animalwelfareaspectsinrespectoftheslaughterorkillingofpregnantlivestockanimalscattlepigssheepgoatshorses |