Cargando…
Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): anthrax
Anthrax has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on the eligibility of anthrax to be listed, Article 9 for the categorisation of anthrax according to disease prevention and control rules...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625603 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4958 |
_version_ | 1783495774991024128 |
---|---|
author | More, Simon Bøtner, Anette Butterworth, Andrew Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Edwards, Sandra Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Good, Margaret Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda, Miguel Angel Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Raj, Mohan Sihvonen, Liisa Spoolder, Hans Stegeman, Jan Arend Thulke, Hans‐Hermann Velarde, Antonio Willeberg, Preben Winckler, Christoph Baldinelli, Francesca Broglia, Alessandro Dhollander, Sofie Beltrán‐Beck, Beatriz Kohnle, Lisa Morgado, Joana Bicout, Dominique |
author_facet | More, Simon Bøtner, Anette Butterworth, Andrew Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Edwards, Sandra Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Good, Margaret Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda, Miguel Angel Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Raj, Mohan Sihvonen, Liisa Spoolder, Hans Stegeman, Jan Arend Thulke, Hans‐Hermann Velarde, Antonio Willeberg, Preben Winckler, Christoph Baldinelli, Francesca Broglia, Alessandro Dhollander, Sofie Beltrán‐Beck, Beatriz Kohnle, Lisa Morgado, Joana Bicout, Dominique |
collection | PubMed |
description | Anthrax has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on the eligibility of anthrax to be listed, Article 9 for the categorisation of anthrax according to disease prevention and control rules as in Annex IV and Article 8 on the list of animal species related to anthrax. The assessment has been performed following a methodology composed of information collection and compilation, expert judgement on each criterion at individual and, if no consensus was reached before, also at collective level. The output is composed of the categorical answer, and for the questions where no consensus was reached, the different supporting views are reported. Details on the methodology used for this assessment are explained in a separate opinion. According to the assessment performed, anthrax can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention as laid down in Article 5(3) of the AHL. The disease would comply with the criteria as in Sections 4 and 5 of Annex IV of the AHL, for the application of the disease prevention and control rules referred to in points (d) and (e) of Article 9(1). The animal species to be listed for anthrax according to Article 8(3) are several species of mammals, birds and reptiles, and susceptible herbivores and pigs as reservoir. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009935 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70099352020-07-02 Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): anthrax More, Simon Bøtner, Anette Butterworth, Andrew Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Edwards, Sandra Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Good, Margaret Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda, Miguel Angel Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Raj, Mohan Sihvonen, Liisa Spoolder, Hans Stegeman, Jan Arend Thulke, Hans‐Hermann Velarde, Antonio Willeberg, Preben Winckler, Christoph Baldinelli, Francesca Broglia, Alessandro Dhollander, Sofie Beltrán‐Beck, Beatriz Kohnle, Lisa Morgado, Joana Bicout, Dominique EFSA J Scientific Opinion Anthrax has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on the eligibility of anthrax to be listed, Article 9 for the categorisation of anthrax according to disease prevention and control rules as in Annex IV and Article 8 on the list of animal species related to anthrax. The assessment has been performed following a methodology composed of information collection and compilation, expert judgement on each criterion at individual and, if no consensus was reached before, also at collective level. The output is composed of the categorical answer, and for the questions where no consensus was reached, the different supporting views are reported. Details on the methodology used for this assessment are explained in a separate opinion. According to the assessment performed, anthrax can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention as laid down in Article 5(3) of the AHL. The disease would comply with the criteria as in Sections 4 and 5 of Annex IV of the AHL, for the application of the disease prevention and control rules referred to in points (d) and (e) of Article 9(1). The animal species to be listed for anthrax according to Article 8(3) are several species of mammals, birds and reptiles, and susceptible herbivores and pigs as reservoir. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7009935/ /pubmed/32625603 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4958 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion More, Simon Bøtner, Anette Butterworth, Andrew Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Edwards, Sandra Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Good, Margaret Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda, Miguel Angel Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Raj, Mohan Sihvonen, Liisa Spoolder, Hans Stegeman, Jan Arend Thulke, Hans‐Hermann Velarde, Antonio Willeberg, Preben Winckler, Christoph Baldinelli, Francesca Broglia, Alessandro Dhollander, Sofie Beltrán‐Beck, Beatriz Kohnle, Lisa Morgado, Joana Bicout, Dominique Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): anthrax |
title | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): anthrax |
title_full | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): anthrax |
title_fullStr | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): anthrax |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): anthrax |
title_short | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): anthrax |
title_sort | assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the animal health law (regulation (eu) no 2016/429): anthrax |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625603 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4958 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT moresimon assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT bøtneranette assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT butterworthandrew assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT calistripaolo assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT depnerklaus assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT edwardssandra assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT garinbastujibruno assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT goodmargaret assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT gortazarschmidtchristian assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT michelvirginie assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT mirandamiguelangel assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT nielsensørensaxmose assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT rajmohan assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT sihvonenliisa assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT spoolderhans assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT stegemanjanarend assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT thulkehanshermann assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT velardeantonio assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT willebergpreben assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT wincklerchristoph assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT baldinellifrancesca assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT brogliaalessandro assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT dhollandersofie assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT beltranbeckbeatriz assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT kohnlelisa assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT morgadojoana assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax AT bicoutdominique assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429anthrax |