Cargando…

Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses

The EFSA Panel on Plant Health performed a pest categorisation of the Citrus leprosis viruses for the EU territory and identified five distinct viruses, Citrus leprosis virus C (CiLV‐C), Citrus leprosis virus C2 (CiLV‐C2), Hibiscus green spot virus 2 (HGSV‐2), the Citrus strain of Orchid fleck virus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeger, Michael, Bragard, Claude, Caffier, David, Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina, Gilioli, Gianni, Gregoire, Jean‐Claude, Jaques Miret, Josep Anton, MacLeod, Alan, Navajas Navarro, Maria, Niere, Björn, Parnell, Stephen, Potting, Roel, Rafoss, Trond, Rossi, Vittorio, Urek, Gregor, Van Bruggen, Ariena, Van der Werf, Wopke, West, Jonathan, Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet, Winter, Stephan, Catara, Antonino, Duran‐Vila, Núria, Hollo, Gabor, Candresse, Thierry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625390
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5110
_version_ 1783495777586249728
author Jeger, Michael
Bragard, Claude
Caffier, David
Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina
Gilioli, Gianni
Gregoire, Jean‐Claude
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
MacLeod, Alan
Navajas Navarro, Maria
Niere, Björn
Parnell, Stephen
Potting, Roel
Rafoss, Trond
Rossi, Vittorio
Urek, Gregor
Van Bruggen, Ariena
Van der Werf, Wopke
West, Jonathan
Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet
Winter, Stephan
Catara, Antonino
Duran‐Vila, Núria
Hollo, Gabor
Candresse, Thierry
author_facet Jeger, Michael
Bragard, Claude
Caffier, David
Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina
Gilioli, Gianni
Gregoire, Jean‐Claude
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
MacLeod, Alan
Navajas Navarro, Maria
Niere, Björn
Parnell, Stephen
Potting, Roel
Rafoss, Trond
Rossi, Vittorio
Urek, Gregor
Van Bruggen, Ariena
Van der Werf, Wopke
West, Jonathan
Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet
Winter, Stephan
Catara, Antonino
Duran‐Vila, Núria
Hollo, Gabor
Candresse, Thierry
collection PubMed
description The EFSA Panel on Plant Health performed a pest categorisation of the Citrus leprosis viruses for the EU territory and identified five distinct viruses, Citrus leprosis virus C (CiLV‐C), Citrus leprosis virus C2 (CiLV‐C2), Hibiscus green spot virus 2 (HGSV‐2), the Citrus strain of Orchid fleck virus (OFV) and Citrus leprosis virus N sensu novo (CiLV‐N) as causing this severe disease, most significantly in sweet orange and mandarin. These viruses have in common that they do not cause systemic infections in their hosts and that they all are transmitted by Brevipalpus spp. mites (likely but not confirmed for HGSV‐2). Mites represent the most important means of virus spread, while plants for planting of Citrus are only considered of minor significance. These well characterised viruses occur in South and Central America. Leprosis is currently regulated in directive 2000/29 EC and, together with its associated viruses, has never been recorded in the EU. All five viruses have the potential to enter into, establish in and spread within the EU territory, with plants for planting of non‐regulated hosts, fruits of Citrus and hitch‐hiking of viruliferous mites identified as the most significant pathways. Given the severity of the leprosis disease, the introduction and spread of the various viruses would have negative consequences on the EU citrus industry, the magnitude of which is difficult to evaluate given the uncertainties affecting the Brevipalpus spp. vectors (identity, distribution, density, transmission specificity and efficiency). Overall, leprosis and its five associated viruses meet all the criteria evaluated by EFSA to qualify as Union quarantine pests, but do not fulfil those of being present in the EU or of plants for planting being the main spread mechanism to qualify as Union regulated non‐quarantine pests. The main uncertainties affecting this categorisation concern the Brevipalpus spp. mite vectors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7009949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70099492020-07-02 Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses Jeger, Michael Bragard, Claude Caffier, David Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina Gilioli, Gianni Gregoire, Jean‐Claude Jaques Miret, Josep Anton MacLeod, Alan Navajas Navarro, Maria Niere, Björn Parnell, Stephen Potting, Roel Rafoss, Trond Rossi, Vittorio Urek, Gregor Van Bruggen, Ariena Van der Werf, Wopke West, Jonathan Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet Winter, Stephan Catara, Antonino Duran‐Vila, Núria Hollo, Gabor Candresse, Thierry EFSA J Scientfic Opinion The EFSA Panel on Plant Health performed a pest categorisation of the Citrus leprosis viruses for the EU territory and identified five distinct viruses, Citrus leprosis virus C (CiLV‐C), Citrus leprosis virus C2 (CiLV‐C2), Hibiscus green spot virus 2 (HGSV‐2), the Citrus strain of Orchid fleck virus (OFV) and Citrus leprosis virus N sensu novo (CiLV‐N) as causing this severe disease, most significantly in sweet orange and mandarin. These viruses have in common that they do not cause systemic infections in their hosts and that they all are transmitted by Brevipalpus spp. mites (likely but not confirmed for HGSV‐2). Mites represent the most important means of virus spread, while plants for planting of Citrus are only considered of minor significance. These well characterised viruses occur in South and Central America. Leprosis is currently regulated in directive 2000/29 EC and, together with its associated viruses, has never been recorded in the EU. All five viruses have the potential to enter into, establish in and spread within the EU territory, with plants for planting of non‐regulated hosts, fruits of Citrus and hitch‐hiking of viruliferous mites identified as the most significant pathways. Given the severity of the leprosis disease, the introduction and spread of the various viruses would have negative consequences on the EU citrus industry, the magnitude of which is difficult to evaluate given the uncertainties affecting the Brevipalpus spp. vectors (identity, distribution, density, transmission specificity and efficiency). Overall, leprosis and its five associated viruses meet all the criteria evaluated by EFSA to qualify as Union quarantine pests, but do not fulfil those of being present in the EU or of plants for planting being the main spread mechanism to qualify as Union regulated non‐quarantine pests. The main uncertainties affecting this categorisation concern the Brevipalpus spp. mite vectors. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7009949/ /pubmed/32625390 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5110 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientfic Opinion
Jeger, Michael
Bragard, Claude
Caffier, David
Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina
Gilioli, Gianni
Gregoire, Jean‐Claude
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
MacLeod, Alan
Navajas Navarro, Maria
Niere, Björn
Parnell, Stephen
Potting, Roel
Rafoss, Trond
Rossi, Vittorio
Urek, Gregor
Van Bruggen, Ariena
Van der Werf, Wopke
West, Jonathan
Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet
Winter, Stephan
Catara, Antonino
Duran‐Vila, Núria
Hollo, Gabor
Candresse, Thierry
Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses
title Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses
title_full Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses
title_fullStr Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses
title_full_unstemmed Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses
title_short Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses
title_sort pest categorisation of citrus leprosis viruses
topic Scientfic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625390
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5110
work_keys_str_mv AT pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT jegermichael pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT bragardclaude pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT caffierdavid pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT dehnenschmutzkatharina pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT gilioligianni pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT gregoirejeanclaude pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT jaquesmiretjosepanton pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT macleodalan pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT navajasnavarromaria pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT nierebjorn pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT parnellstephen pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT pottingroel pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT rafosstrond pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT rossivittorio pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT urekgregor pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT vanbruggenariena pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT vanderwerfwopke pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT westjonathan pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT chatzivassiliouelisavet pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT winterstephan pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT cataraantonino pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT duranvilanuria pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT hollogabor pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses
AT candressethierry pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses