Cargando…
Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses
The EFSA Panel on Plant Health performed a pest categorisation of the Citrus leprosis viruses for the EU territory and identified five distinct viruses, Citrus leprosis virus C (CiLV‐C), Citrus leprosis virus C2 (CiLV‐C2), Hibiscus green spot virus 2 (HGSV‐2), the Citrus strain of Orchid fleck virus...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625390 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5110 |
_version_ | 1783495777586249728 |
---|---|
author | Jeger, Michael Bragard, Claude Caffier, David Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina Gilioli, Gianni Gregoire, Jean‐Claude Jaques Miret, Josep Anton MacLeod, Alan Navajas Navarro, Maria Niere, Björn Parnell, Stephen Potting, Roel Rafoss, Trond Rossi, Vittorio Urek, Gregor Van Bruggen, Ariena Van der Werf, Wopke West, Jonathan Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet Winter, Stephan Catara, Antonino Duran‐Vila, Núria Hollo, Gabor Candresse, Thierry |
author_facet | Jeger, Michael Bragard, Claude Caffier, David Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina Gilioli, Gianni Gregoire, Jean‐Claude Jaques Miret, Josep Anton MacLeod, Alan Navajas Navarro, Maria Niere, Björn Parnell, Stephen Potting, Roel Rafoss, Trond Rossi, Vittorio Urek, Gregor Van Bruggen, Ariena Van der Werf, Wopke West, Jonathan Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet Winter, Stephan Catara, Antonino Duran‐Vila, Núria Hollo, Gabor Candresse, Thierry |
collection | PubMed |
description | The EFSA Panel on Plant Health performed a pest categorisation of the Citrus leprosis viruses for the EU territory and identified five distinct viruses, Citrus leprosis virus C (CiLV‐C), Citrus leprosis virus C2 (CiLV‐C2), Hibiscus green spot virus 2 (HGSV‐2), the Citrus strain of Orchid fleck virus (OFV) and Citrus leprosis virus N sensu novo (CiLV‐N) as causing this severe disease, most significantly in sweet orange and mandarin. These viruses have in common that they do not cause systemic infections in their hosts and that they all are transmitted by Brevipalpus spp. mites (likely but not confirmed for HGSV‐2). Mites represent the most important means of virus spread, while plants for planting of Citrus are only considered of minor significance. These well characterised viruses occur in South and Central America. Leprosis is currently regulated in directive 2000/29 EC and, together with its associated viruses, has never been recorded in the EU. All five viruses have the potential to enter into, establish in and spread within the EU territory, with plants for planting of non‐regulated hosts, fruits of Citrus and hitch‐hiking of viruliferous mites identified as the most significant pathways. Given the severity of the leprosis disease, the introduction and spread of the various viruses would have negative consequences on the EU citrus industry, the magnitude of which is difficult to evaluate given the uncertainties affecting the Brevipalpus spp. vectors (identity, distribution, density, transmission specificity and efficiency). Overall, leprosis and its five associated viruses meet all the criteria evaluated by EFSA to qualify as Union quarantine pests, but do not fulfil those of being present in the EU or of plants for planting being the main spread mechanism to qualify as Union regulated non‐quarantine pests. The main uncertainties affecting this categorisation concern the Brevipalpus spp. mite vectors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009949 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70099492020-07-02 Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses Jeger, Michael Bragard, Claude Caffier, David Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina Gilioli, Gianni Gregoire, Jean‐Claude Jaques Miret, Josep Anton MacLeod, Alan Navajas Navarro, Maria Niere, Björn Parnell, Stephen Potting, Roel Rafoss, Trond Rossi, Vittorio Urek, Gregor Van Bruggen, Ariena Van der Werf, Wopke West, Jonathan Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet Winter, Stephan Catara, Antonino Duran‐Vila, Núria Hollo, Gabor Candresse, Thierry EFSA J Scientfic Opinion The EFSA Panel on Plant Health performed a pest categorisation of the Citrus leprosis viruses for the EU territory and identified five distinct viruses, Citrus leprosis virus C (CiLV‐C), Citrus leprosis virus C2 (CiLV‐C2), Hibiscus green spot virus 2 (HGSV‐2), the Citrus strain of Orchid fleck virus (OFV) and Citrus leprosis virus N sensu novo (CiLV‐N) as causing this severe disease, most significantly in sweet orange and mandarin. These viruses have in common that they do not cause systemic infections in their hosts and that they all are transmitted by Brevipalpus spp. mites (likely but not confirmed for HGSV‐2). Mites represent the most important means of virus spread, while plants for planting of Citrus are only considered of minor significance. These well characterised viruses occur in South and Central America. Leprosis is currently regulated in directive 2000/29 EC and, together with its associated viruses, has never been recorded in the EU. All five viruses have the potential to enter into, establish in and spread within the EU territory, with plants for planting of non‐regulated hosts, fruits of Citrus and hitch‐hiking of viruliferous mites identified as the most significant pathways. Given the severity of the leprosis disease, the introduction and spread of the various viruses would have negative consequences on the EU citrus industry, the magnitude of which is difficult to evaluate given the uncertainties affecting the Brevipalpus spp. vectors (identity, distribution, density, transmission specificity and efficiency). Overall, leprosis and its five associated viruses meet all the criteria evaluated by EFSA to qualify as Union quarantine pests, but do not fulfil those of being present in the EU or of plants for planting being the main spread mechanism to qualify as Union regulated non‐quarantine pests. The main uncertainties affecting this categorisation concern the Brevipalpus spp. mite vectors. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7009949/ /pubmed/32625390 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5110 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientfic Opinion Jeger, Michael Bragard, Claude Caffier, David Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina Gilioli, Gianni Gregoire, Jean‐Claude Jaques Miret, Josep Anton MacLeod, Alan Navajas Navarro, Maria Niere, Björn Parnell, Stephen Potting, Roel Rafoss, Trond Rossi, Vittorio Urek, Gregor Van Bruggen, Ariena Van der Werf, Wopke West, Jonathan Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet Winter, Stephan Catara, Antonino Duran‐Vila, Núria Hollo, Gabor Candresse, Thierry Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses |
title | Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses |
title_full | Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses |
title_fullStr | Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses |
title_full_unstemmed | Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses |
title_short | Pest categorisation of Citrus leprosis viruses |
title_sort | pest categorisation of citrus leprosis viruses |
topic | Scientfic Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625390 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5110 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT jegermichael pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT bragardclaude pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT caffierdavid pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT dehnenschmutzkatharina pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT gilioligianni pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT gregoirejeanclaude pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT jaquesmiretjosepanton pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT macleodalan pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT navajasnavarromaria pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT nierebjorn pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT parnellstephen pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT pottingroel pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT rafosstrond pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT rossivittorio pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT urekgregor pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT vanbruggenariena pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT vanderwerfwopke pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT westjonathan pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT chatzivassiliouelisavet pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT winterstephan pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT cataraantonino pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT duranvilanuria pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT hollogabor pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses AT candressethierry pestcategorisationofcitrusleprosisviruses |