Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of Calsporin(®) (Bacillus subtilis DSM 15544) as a feed additive for dogs
Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Calsporin(®) when used in feed for dogs. The additive contains viable spores of a single strain of Baci...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625462 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4760 |
_version_ | 1783495788074106880 |
---|---|
author | Rychen, Guido Aquilina, Gabriele Azimonti, Giovanna Bampidis, Vasileios Bastos, Maria de Lourdes Bories, Georges Chesson, Andrew Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Flachowsky, Gerhard Gropp, Jürgen Kolar, Boris Kouba, Maryline López Puente, Secundino López‐Alonso, Marta Mantovani, Alberto Mayo, Baltasar Ramos, Fernando Villa, Roberto Edoardo Wallace, Robert John Wester, Pieter Brozzi, Rosella Saarela, Maria |
author_facet | Rychen, Guido Aquilina, Gabriele Azimonti, Giovanna Bampidis, Vasileios Bastos, Maria de Lourdes Bories, Georges Chesson, Andrew Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Flachowsky, Gerhard Gropp, Jürgen Kolar, Boris Kouba, Maryline López Puente, Secundino López‐Alonso, Marta Mantovani, Alberto Mayo, Baltasar Ramos, Fernando Villa, Roberto Edoardo Wallace, Robert John Wester, Pieter Brozzi, Rosella Saarela, Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Calsporin(®) when used in feed for dogs. The additive contains viable spores of a single strain of Bacillus subtilis. This species is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach to safety assessment. This approach requires the identity of the strain to be conclusively established, evidence that the strain is not toxigenic and that it does not show resistance to antibiotics of human and veterinary importance. The strain was found to meet the criteria for the QPS approach in the context of previous opinions and since concerns are not expected from other components of the additive, Calsporin(®) is presumed safe for all target species, including dogs, and for the environment. In a previous opinion, the Panel also concluded that the additive is not a dermal/eye irritant or a skin sensitiser but should be considered a potential respiratory sensitiser. The use of the additive in dogs is considered unlikely to introduce hazards for users of the product not already considered as part of the first assessment. Therefore, the conclusions reached apply to the current application. Four studies were supplied aiming at investigating the effects of the supplementation of Calsporin(®) to the faecal consistency of dogs. Overall, there is a small but significant increase in faecal dry matter content and benefits seen in a subjective assessment of faecal consistency. However, the biological relevance of changes of this magnitude for the animal is questionable, as are the practical benefits for the owner. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009994 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70099942020-07-02 Safety and efficacy of Calsporin(®) (Bacillus subtilis DSM 15544) as a feed additive for dogs Rychen, Guido Aquilina, Gabriele Azimonti, Giovanna Bampidis, Vasileios Bastos, Maria de Lourdes Bories, Georges Chesson, Andrew Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Flachowsky, Gerhard Gropp, Jürgen Kolar, Boris Kouba, Maryline López Puente, Secundino López‐Alonso, Marta Mantovani, Alberto Mayo, Baltasar Ramos, Fernando Villa, Roberto Edoardo Wallace, Robert John Wester, Pieter Brozzi, Rosella Saarela, Maria EFSA J Scientific Opinion Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Calsporin(®) when used in feed for dogs. The additive contains viable spores of a single strain of Bacillus subtilis. This species is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach to safety assessment. This approach requires the identity of the strain to be conclusively established, evidence that the strain is not toxigenic and that it does not show resistance to antibiotics of human and veterinary importance. The strain was found to meet the criteria for the QPS approach in the context of previous opinions and since concerns are not expected from other components of the additive, Calsporin(®) is presumed safe for all target species, including dogs, and for the environment. In a previous opinion, the Panel also concluded that the additive is not a dermal/eye irritant or a skin sensitiser but should be considered a potential respiratory sensitiser. The use of the additive in dogs is considered unlikely to introduce hazards for users of the product not already considered as part of the first assessment. Therefore, the conclusions reached apply to the current application. Four studies were supplied aiming at investigating the effects of the supplementation of Calsporin(®) to the faecal consistency of dogs. Overall, there is a small but significant increase in faecal dry matter content and benefits seen in a subjective assessment of faecal consistency. However, the biological relevance of changes of this magnitude for the animal is questionable, as are the practical benefits for the owner. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7009994/ /pubmed/32625462 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4760 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Rychen, Guido Aquilina, Gabriele Azimonti, Giovanna Bampidis, Vasileios Bastos, Maria de Lourdes Bories, Georges Chesson, Andrew Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Flachowsky, Gerhard Gropp, Jürgen Kolar, Boris Kouba, Maryline López Puente, Secundino López‐Alonso, Marta Mantovani, Alberto Mayo, Baltasar Ramos, Fernando Villa, Roberto Edoardo Wallace, Robert John Wester, Pieter Brozzi, Rosella Saarela, Maria Safety and efficacy of Calsporin(®) (Bacillus subtilis DSM 15544) as a feed additive for dogs |
title | Safety and efficacy of Calsporin(®) (Bacillus subtilis
DSM 15544) as a feed additive for dogs |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of Calsporin(®) (Bacillus subtilis
DSM 15544) as a feed additive for dogs |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of Calsporin(®) (Bacillus subtilis
DSM 15544) as a feed additive for dogs |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of Calsporin(®) (Bacillus subtilis
DSM 15544) as a feed additive for dogs |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of Calsporin(®) (Bacillus subtilis
DSM 15544) as a feed additive for dogs |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of calsporin(®) (bacillus subtilis
dsm 15544) as a feed additive for dogs |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625462 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4760 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs AT rychenguido safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs AT aquilinagabriele safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs AT azimontigiovanna safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs AT bampidisvasileios safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs AT bastosmariadelourdes safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs AT boriesgeorges safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs AT chessonandrew safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs AT flachowskygerhard safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs AT groppjurgen safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs AT kolarboris safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs AT koubamaryline safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs AT lopezpuentesecundino safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs AT lopezalonsomarta safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs AT mantovanialberto safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs AT mayobaltasar safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs AT ramosfernando safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs AT villarobertoedoardo safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs AT wallacerobertjohn safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs AT westerpieter safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs AT brozzirosella safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs AT saarelamaria safetyandefficacyofcalsporinbacillussubtilisdsm15544asafeedadditivefordogs |