Cargando…
Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): Borna disease
Borna disease has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on the eligibility of Borna disease to be listed, Article 9 for the categorisation of Borna disease according to disease prevention...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625602 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4951 |
_version_ | 1783495789046136832 |
---|---|
author | More, Simon Bøtner, Anette Butterworth, Andrew Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Edwards, Sandra Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Good, Margaret Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda, Miguel Angel Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Raj, Mohan Sihvonen, Liisa Spoolder, Hans Stegeman, Jan Arend Thulke, Hans H Velarde, Antonio Willeberg, Preben Winckler, Christoph Baldinelli, Francesca Broglia, Alessandro Dhollander, Sofie Beltrán‐Beck, Beatriz Kohnle, Lisa Bicout, Dominique |
author_facet | More, Simon Bøtner, Anette Butterworth, Andrew Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Edwards, Sandra Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Good, Margaret Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda, Miguel Angel Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Raj, Mohan Sihvonen, Liisa Spoolder, Hans Stegeman, Jan Arend Thulke, Hans H Velarde, Antonio Willeberg, Preben Winckler, Christoph Baldinelli, Francesca Broglia, Alessandro Dhollander, Sofie Beltrán‐Beck, Beatriz Kohnle, Lisa Bicout, Dominique |
collection | PubMed |
description | Borna disease has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on the eligibility of Borna disease to be listed, Article 9 for the categorisation of Borna disease according to disease prevention and control rules as in Annex IV and Article 8 on the list of animal species related to Borna disease. The assessment has been performed following a methodology composed of information collection and compilation, expert judgement on each criterion at individual and, if no consensus was reached before, also at collective level. The output is composed of the categorical answer, and for the questions where no consensus was reached, the different supporting views are reported. Details on the methodology used for this assessment are explained in a separate opinion. According to the assessment performed, Borna disease cannot be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention as laid down in Article 5(3) of the AHL because there was no compliance on criterion 5 A(v). Consequently, the assessment on compliance of Borna disease with the criteria as in Annex IV of the AHL, for the application of the disease prevention and control rules referred to in Article 9(1) is not applicable, as well as which animal species can be considered to be listed for Borna disease according to Article 8(3) of the AHL. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7009998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70099982020-07-02 Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): Borna disease More, Simon Bøtner, Anette Butterworth, Andrew Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Edwards, Sandra Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Good, Margaret Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda, Miguel Angel Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Raj, Mohan Sihvonen, Liisa Spoolder, Hans Stegeman, Jan Arend Thulke, Hans H Velarde, Antonio Willeberg, Preben Winckler, Christoph Baldinelli, Francesca Broglia, Alessandro Dhollander, Sofie Beltrán‐Beck, Beatriz Kohnle, Lisa Bicout, Dominique EFSA J Scientific Opinion Borna disease has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on the eligibility of Borna disease to be listed, Article 9 for the categorisation of Borna disease according to disease prevention and control rules as in Annex IV and Article 8 on the list of animal species related to Borna disease. The assessment has been performed following a methodology composed of information collection and compilation, expert judgement on each criterion at individual and, if no consensus was reached before, also at collective level. The output is composed of the categorical answer, and for the questions where no consensus was reached, the different supporting views are reported. Details on the methodology used for this assessment are explained in a separate opinion. According to the assessment performed, Borna disease cannot be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention as laid down in Article 5(3) of the AHL because there was no compliance on criterion 5 A(v). Consequently, the assessment on compliance of Borna disease with the criteria as in Annex IV of the AHL, for the application of the disease prevention and control rules referred to in Article 9(1) is not applicable, as well as which animal species can be considered to be listed for Borna disease according to Article 8(3) of the AHL. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7009998/ /pubmed/32625602 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4951 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion More, Simon Bøtner, Anette Butterworth, Andrew Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Edwards, Sandra Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Good, Margaret Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Michel, Virginie Miranda, Miguel Angel Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Raj, Mohan Sihvonen, Liisa Spoolder, Hans Stegeman, Jan Arend Thulke, Hans H Velarde, Antonio Willeberg, Preben Winckler, Christoph Baldinelli, Francesca Broglia, Alessandro Dhollander, Sofie Beltrán‐Beck, Beatriz Kohnle, Lisa Bicout, Dominique Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): Borna disease |
title | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): Borna disease |
title_full | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): Borna disease |
title_fullStr | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): Borna disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): Borna disease |
title_short | Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): Borna disease |
title_sort | assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the animal health law (regulation (eu) no 2016/429): borna disease |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7009998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625602 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4951 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT moresimon assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT bøtneranette assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT butterworthandrew assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT calistripaolo assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT depnerklaus assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT edwardssandra assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT garinbastujibruno assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT goodmargaret assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT gortazarschmidtchristian assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT michelvirginie assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT mirandamiguelangel assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT nielsensørensaxmose assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT rajmohan assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT sihvonenliisa assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT spoolderhans assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT stegemanjanarend assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT thulkehansh assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT velardeantonio assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT willebergpreben assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT wincklerchristoph assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT baldinellifrancesca assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT brogliaalessandro assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT dhollandersofie assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT beltranbeckbeatriz assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT kohnlelisa assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease AT bicoutdominique assessmentoflistingandcategorisationofanimaldiseaseswithintheframeworkoftheanimalhealthlawregulationeuno2016429bornadisease |