Cargando…

Re‐evaluation of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive

The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive. In the EU, acacia gum has not been formally evaluated by the Scientific Committee for Food (SCF), and therefore, no ADI has been alloc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mortensen, Alicja, Aguilar, Fernando, Crebelli, Riccardo, Di Domenico, Alessandro, Frutos, Maria Jose, Galtier, Pierre, Gott, David, Gundert‐Remy, Ursula, Lambré, Claude, Leblanc, Jean‐Charles, Lindtner, Oliver, Moldeus, Peter, Mosesso, Pasquale, Oskarsson, Agneta, Parent‐Massin, Dominique, Stankovic, Ivan, Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine, Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius, Wright, Matthew, Younes, Maged, Brimer, Leon, Christodoulidou, Anna, Lodi, Federica, Tard, Alexandra, Dusemund, Birgit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625453
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4741
_version_ 1783495795904872448
author Mortensen, Alicja
Aguilar, Fernando
Crebelli, Riccardo
Di Domenico, Alessandro
Frutos, Maria Jose
Galtier, Pierre
Gott, David
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Lambré, Claude
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Lindtner, Oliver
Moldeus, Peter
Mosesso, Pasquale
Oskarsson, Agneta
Parent‐Massin, Dominique
Stankovic, Ivan
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius
Wright, Matthew
Younes, Maged
Brimer, Leon
Christodoulidou, Anna
Lodi, Federica
Tard, Alexandra
Dusemund, Birgit
author_facet Mortensen, Alicja
Aguilar, Fernando
Crebelli, Riccardo
Di Domenico, Alessandro
Frutos, Maria Jose
Galtier, Pierre
Gott, David
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Lambré, Claude
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Lindtner, Oliver
Moldeus, Peter
Mosesso, Pasquale
Oskarsson, Agneta
Parent‐Massin, Dominique
Stankovic, Ivan
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius
Wright, Matthew
Younes, Maged
Brimer, Leon
Christodoulidou, Anna
Lodi, Federica
Tard, Alexandra
Dusemund, Birgit
collection PubMed
description The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive. In the EU, acacia gum has not been formally evaluated by the Scientific Committee for Food (SCF), and therefore, no ADI has been allocated. However, it was accepted for use in weaning food (SCF, 1991). In 1999, the SCF considered ‘that the use of acacia gum/gum arabic in coatings for nutrient preparations containing trace elements is acceptable provided carry‐over levels in infant formulae, follow‐on formulae or FSMP do not exceed 10 mg/kg’. Acacia gum was evaluated by JECFA in 1982 and 1990 and the specifications were amended in 1998. Based on the lack of adverse effects in the available toxicity studies, an ADI ‘not specified’ was allocated. Following the conceptual framework for the risk assessment of certain food additives re‐evaluated under Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010, the Panel considered that adequate exposure and toxicity data were available. Acacia gum is unlikely to be absorbed intact and is slightly fermented by intestinal microbiota. No adverse effects were reported in subchronic and carcinogenicity studies at the highest dose tested and there is no concern with respect to the genotoxicity. Oral daily intake of a large amount of acacia gum up to 30,000 mg acacia gum/person per day (approximately equivalent 430 mg acacia gum/kg bw per day) for up to 18 days was well tolerated in adults but some individuals experienced flatulence which was considered by the Panel as undesirable but not adverse effect. The Panel concluded that there is no need for a numerical ADI for acacia gum (E 414), and there is no safety concern for the general population at the refined exposure assessment of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7010027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70100272020-07-02 Re‐evaluation of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive Mortensen, Alicja Aguilar, Fernando Crebelli, Riccardo Di Domenico, Alessandro Frutos, Maria Jose Galtier, Pierre Gott, David Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Lambré, Claude Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Lindtner, Oliver Moldeus, Peter Mosesso, Pasquale Oskarsson, Agneta Parent‐Massin, Dominique Stankovic, Ivan Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius Wright, Matthew Younes, Maged Brimer, Leon Christodoulidou, Anna Lodi, Federica Tard, Alexandra Dusemund, Birgit EFSA J Scientific Opinion The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive. In the EU, acacia gum has not been formally evaluated by the Scientific Committee for Food (SCF), and therefore, no ADI has been allocated. However, it was accepted for use in weaning food (SCF, 1991). In 1999, the SCF considered ‘that the use of acacia gum/gum arabic in coatings for nutrient preparations containing trace elements is acceptable provided carry‐over levels in infant formulae, follow‐on formulae or FSMP do not exceed 10 mg/kg’. Acacia gum was evaluated by JECFA in 1982 and 1990 and the specifications were amended in 1998. Based on the lack of adverse effects in the available toxicity studies, an ADI ‘not specified’ was allocated. Following the conceptual framework for the risk assessment of certain food additives re‐evaluated under Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010, the Panel considered that adequate exposure and toxicity data were available. Acacia gum is unlikely to be absorbed intact and is slightly fermented by intestinal microbiota. No adverse effects were reported in subchronic and carcinogenicity studies at the highest dose tested and there is no concern with respect to the genotoxicity. Oral daily intake of a large amount of acacia gum up to 30,000 mg acacia gum/person per day (approximately equivalent 430 mg acacia gum/kg bw per day) for up to 18 days was well tolerated in adults but some individuals experienced flatulence which was considered by the Panel as undesirable but not adverse effect. The Panel concluded that there is no need for a numerical ADI for acacia gum (E 414), and there is no safety concern for the general population at the refined exposure assessment of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7010027/ /pubmed/32625453 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4741 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Mortensen, Alicja
Aguilar, Fernando
Crebelli, Riccardo
Di Domenico, Alessandro
Frutos, Maria Jose
Galtier, Pierre
Gott, David
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Lambré, Claude
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Lindtner, Oliver
Moldeus, Peter
Mosesso, Pasquale
Oskarsson, Agneta
Parent‐Massin, Dominique
Stankovic, Ivan
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius
Wright, Matthew
Younes, Maged
Brimer, Leon
Christodoulidou, Anna
Lodi, Federica
Tard, Alexandra
Dusemund, Birgit
Re‐evaluation of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive
title Re‐evaluation of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive
title_full Re‐evaluation of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive
title_fullStr Re‐evaluation of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive
title_full_unstemmed Re‐evaluation of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive
title_short Re‐evaluation of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive
title_sort re‐evaluation of acacia gum (e 414) as a food additive
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625453
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4741
work_keys_str_mv AT reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT mortensenalicja reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT aguilarfernando reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT crebelliriccardo reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT didomenicoalessandro reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT frutosmariajose reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT galtierpierre reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT gottdavid reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT gundertremyursula reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT lambreclaude reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT leblancjeancharles reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT lindtneroliver reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT moldeuspeter reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT mosessopasquale reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT oskarssonagneta reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT parentmassindominique reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT stankovicivan reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT waalkensberendsenine reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT woutersenrudolfantonius reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT wrightmatthew reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT younesmaged reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT brimerleon reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT christodoulidouanna reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT lodifederica reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT tardalexandra reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive
AT dusemundbirgit reevaluationofacaciagume414asafoodadditive