Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus rhamnosus DSM 29226 as a silage additive for all animal species
Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of a strain of Lactobacillus rhamnosus when used as a technological additive intended to improve ensiling at a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625263 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4673 |
_version_ | 1783495796832862208 |
---|---|
author | Rychen, Guido Aquilina, Gabriele Azimonti, Giovanna Bampidis, Vasileios Bastos, Maria De Lourdes Bories, Georges Chesson, Andrew Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Flachowsky, Gerhard Gropp, Jürgen Kolar, Boris Kouba, Maryline López Puente, Secundino López‐Alonso, Marta Mantovani, Alberto Ramos, Fernando Villa, Roberto Edoardo Wallace, Robert John Wester, Pieter Brozzi, Rosella Saarela, Maria |
author_facet | Rychen, Guido Aquilina, Gabriele Azimonti, Giovanna Bampidis, Vasileios Bastos, Maria De Lourdes Bories, Georges Chesson, Andrew Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Flachowsky, Gerhard Gropp, Jürgen Kolar, Boris Kouba, Maryline López Puente, Secundino López‐Alonso, Marta Mantovani, Alberto Ramos, Fernando Villa, Roberto Edoardo Wallace, Robert John Wester, Pieter Brozzi, Rosella Saarela, Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of a strain of Lactobacillus rhamnosus when used as a technological additive intended to improve ensiling at a proposed application rate of 5.0 × 10(7) colony‐forming units (CFU)/kg fresh material. The bacterial species L. rhamnosus is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety approach to safety assessment. As the identity of the strain has been clearly established and as no antibiotic resistance of concern was detected, the use of the strain as a silage additive is considered safe for livestock species, for consumers of products from animals fed the treated silage and for the environment. In the absence of data, no conclusion can be drawn on the skin and eye irritancy or skin sensitisation of the additive. The additive should be considered as a potential respiratory sensitiser. Seven studies with laboratory‐scale silos were made using samples of forage of differing dry matter and water‐soluble carbohydrate content. In each case, replicate silos containing treated forage were compared with identical silos containing the same but untreated forage. The results showed that the additive has the potential to improve the production of silage from easy and moderately difficult to ensile forage species by reducing dry matter loss and enhancing protein preservation. This was shown at the proposed application rate of 5 × 10(7) CFU/kg forage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7010031 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70100312020-07-02 Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus rhamnosus DSM 29226 as a silage additive for all animal species Rychen, Guido Aquilina, Gabriele Azimonti, Giovanna Bampidis, Vasileios Bastos, Maria De Lourdes Bories, Georges Chesson, Andrew Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Flachowsky, Gerhard Gropp, Jürgen Kolar, Boris Kouba, Maryline López Puente, Secundino López‐Alonso, Marta Mantovani, Alberto Ramos, Fernando Villa, Roberto Edoardo Wallace, Robert John Wester, Pieter Brozzi, Rosella Saarela, Maria EFSA J Scientific Opinion Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of a strain of Lactobacillus rhamnosus when used as a technological additive intended to improve ensiling at a proposed application rate of 5.0 × 10(7) colony‐forming units (CFU)/kg fresh material. The bacterial species L. rhamnosus is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety approach to safety assessment. As the identity of the strain has been clearly established and as no antibiotic resistance of concern was detected, the use of the strain as a silage additive is considered safe for livestock species, for consumers of products from animals fed the treated silage and for the environment. In the absence of data, no conclusion can be drawn on the skin and eye irritancy or skin sensitisation of the additive. The additive should be considered as a potential respiratory sensitiser. Seven studies with laboratory‐scale silos were made using samples of forage of differing dry matter and water‐soluble carbohydrate content. In each case, replicate silos containing treated forage were compared with identical silos containing the same but untreated forage. The results showed that the additive has the potential to improve the production of silage from easy and moderately difficult to ensile forage species by reducing dry matter loss and enhancing protein preservation. This was shown at the proposed application rate of 5 × 10(7) CFU/kg forage. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7010031/ /pubmed/32625263 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4673 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Rychen, Guido Aquilina, Gabriele Azimonti, Giovanna Bampidis, Vasileios Bastos, Maria De Lourdes Bories, Georges Chesson, Andrew Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Flachowsky, Gerhard Gropp, Jürgen Kolar, Boris Kouba, Maryline López Puente, Secundino López‐Alonso, Marta Mantovani, Alberto Ramos, Fernando Villa, Roberto Edoardo Wallace, Robert John Wester, Pieter Brozzi, Rosella Saarela, Maria Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus rhamnosus DSM 29226 as a silage additive for all animal species |
title | Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus rhamnosus DSM 29226 as a silage additive for all animal species |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus rhamnosus DSM 29226 as a silage additive for all animal species |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus rhamnosus DSM 29226 as a silage additive for all animal species |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus rhamnosus DSM 29226 as a silage additive for all animal species |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus rhamnosus DSM 29226 as a silage additive for all animal species |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of lactobacillus rhamnosus dsm 29226 as a silage additive for all animal species |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625263 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4673 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusrhamnosusdsm29226asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT rychenguido safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusrhamnosusdsm29226asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT aquilinagabriele safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusrhamnosusdsm29226asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT azimontigiovanna safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusrhamnosusdsm29226asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT bampidisvasileios safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusrhamnosusdsm29226asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT bastosmariadelourdes safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusrhamnosusdsm29226asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT boriesgeorges safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusrhamnosusdsm29226asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT chessonandrew safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusrhamnosusdsm29226asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusrhamnosusdsm29226asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT flachowskygerhard safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusrhamnosusdsm29226asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT groppjurgen safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusrhamnosusdsm29226asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT kolarboris safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusrhamnosusdsm29226asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT koubamaryline safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusrhamnosusdsm29226asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT lopezpuentesecundino safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusrhamnosusdsm29226asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT lopezalonsomarta safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusrhamnosusdsm29226asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT mantovanialberto safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusrhamnosusdsm29226asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT ramosfernando safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusrhamnosusdsm29226asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT villarobertoedoardo safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusrhamnosusdsm29226asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT wallacerobertjohn safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusrhamnosusdsm29226asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT westerpieter safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusrhamnosusdsm29226asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT brozzirosella safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusrhamnosusdsm29226asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies AT saarelamaria safetyandefficacyoflactobacillusrhamnosusdsm29226asasilageadditiveforallanimalspecies |