Cargando…
Safety assessment of the process ‘4PET’, based on EREMA Basic technology, used to recycle post‐consumer PET into food contact materials
This scientific opinion of the EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF Panel) deals with the safety assessment of the 4PET recycling process (EU register number RECYC0139), which is based on the EREMA Basic technology. The input to this process is hot wash...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625515 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4845 |
_version_ | 1783495799449059328 |
---|---|
author | Silano, Vittorio Bolognesi, Claudia Castle, Laurence Cravedi, Jean‐Pierre Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Grob, Konrad Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Kärenlampi, Sirpa Mennes, Wim Penninks, André Smith, Andrew Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima Tlustos, Christina Wölfle, Detlef Zorn, Holger Zugravu, Corina‐Aurelia Dudler, Vincent Gontard, Nathalie Lampi, Eugenia Nerin, Cristina Papaspyrides, Constantine Volk, Katharina Milana, Maria Rosaria |
author_facet | Silano, Vittorio Bolognesi, Claudia Castle, Laurence Cravedi, Jean‐Pierre Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Grob, Konrad Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Kärenlampi, Sirpa Mennes, Wim Penninks, André Smith, Andrew Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima Tlustos, Christina Wölfle, Detlef Zorn, Holger Zugravu, Corina‐Aurelia Dudler, Vincent Gontard, Nathalie Lampi, Eugenia Nerin, Cristina Papaspyrides, Constantine Volk, Katharina Milana, Maria Rosaria |
collection | PubMed |
description | This scientific opinion of the EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF Panel) deals with the safety assessment of the 4PET recycling process (EU register number RECYC0139), which is based on the EREMA Basic technology. The input to this process is hot washed and dried poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) flakes originating from collected post‐consumer PET containers, containing no more than 5% PET from non‐food consumer applications. In this technology, post‐consumer washed and dried PET flakes are heated in a continuous reactor under vacuum before being extruded. Having examined the results of the challenge test provided, the Panel concluded that the continuous reactor step (step 2) is the critical step that determines the decontamination efficiency of the process. The operating parameters controlling its performance are well defined and are temperature, pressure and residence time. It was demonstrated that, depending on the operating conditions, the recycling process under evaluation is able to ensure that the level of migration of potential unknown contaminants into food is below a conservatively modelled migration of 0.15 μg/kg food, derived from the exposure scenario for toddlers. The Panel concluded that recycled PET obtained from the process is not of safety concern when the final thermoformed trays and containers and PET beverage bottles manufactured with the recycled pellets and not used for packaging water or ready‐to‐feed liquid infant formulae contain up to 90% recycled post‐consumer PET. These thermoformed trays are not intended to be used and should not be used in microwave and conventional ovens. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7010042 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70100422020-07-02 Safety assessment of the process ‘4PET’, based on EREMA Basic technology, used to recycle post‐consumer PET into food contact materials Silano, Vittorio Bolognesi, Claudia Castle, Laurence Cravedi, Jean‐Pierre Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Grob, Konrad Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Kärenlampi, Sirpa Mennes, Wim Penninks, André Smith, Andrew Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima Tlustos, Christina Wölfle, Detlef Zorn, Holger Zugravu, Corina‐Aurelia Dudler, Vincent Gontard, Nathalie Lampi, Eugenia Nerin, Cristina Papaspyrides, Constantine Volk, Katharina Milana, Maria Rosaria EFSA J Scientific Opinion This scientific opinion of the EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF Panel) deals with the safety assessment of the 4PET recycling process (EU register number RECYC0139), which is based on the EREMA Basic technology. The input to this process is hot washed and dried poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) flakes originating from collected post‐consumer PET containers, containing no more than 5% PET from non‐food consumer applications. In this technology, post‐consumer washed and dried PET flakes are heated in a continuous reactor under vacuum before being extruded. Having examined the results of the challenge test provided, the Panel concluded that the continuous reactor step (step 2) is the critical step that determines the decontamination efficiency of the process. The operating parameters controlling its performance are well defined and are temperature, pressure and residence time. It was demonstrated that, depending on the operating conditions, the recycling process under evaluation is able to ensure that the level of migration of potential unknown contaminants into food is below a conservatively modelled migration of 0.15 μg/kg food, derived from the exposure scenario for toddlers. The Panel concluded that recycled PET obtained from the process is not of safety concern when the final thermoformed trays and containers and PET beverage bottles manufactured with the recycled pellets and not used for packaging water or ready‐to‐feed liquid infant formulae contain up to 90% recycled post‐consumer PET. These thermoformed trays are not intended to be used and should not be used in microwave and conventional ovens. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7010042/ /pubmed/32625515 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4845 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Silano, Vittorio Bolognesi, Claudia Castle, Laurence Cravedi, Jean‐Pierre Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Grob, Konrad Gürtler, Rainer Husøy, Trine Kärenlampi, Sirpa Mennes, Wim Penninks, André Smith, Andrew Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima Tlustos, Christina Wölfle, Detlef Zorn, Holger Zugravu, Corina‐Aurelia Dudler, Vincent Gontard, Nathalie Lampi, Eugenia Nerin, Cristina Papaspyrides, Constantine Volk, Katharina Milana, Maria Rosaria Safety assessment of the process ‘4PET’, based on EREMA Basic technology, used to recycle post‐consumer PET into food contact materials |
title | Safety assessment of the process ‘4PET’, based on EREMA Basic technology, used to recycle post‐consumer PET into food contact materials |
title_full | Safety assessment of the process ‘4PET’, based on EREMA Basic technology, used to recycle post‐consumer PET into food contact materials |
title_fullStr | Safety assessment of the process ‘4PET’, based on EREMA Basic technology, used to recycle post‐consumer PET into food contact materials |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety assessment of the process ‘4PET’, based on EREMA Basic technology, used to recycle post‐consumer PET into food contact materials |
title_short | Safety assessment of the process ‘4PET’, based on EREMA Basic technology, used to recycle post‐consumer PET into food contact materials |
title_sort | safety assessment of the process ‘4pet’, based on erema basic technology, used to recycle post‐consumer pet into food contact materials |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625515 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4845 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT silanovittorio safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT bolognesiclaudia safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT castlelaurence safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT cravedijeanpierre safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT engelkarlheinz safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT fowlerpaul safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT grobkonrad safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT gurtlerrainer safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT husøytrine safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT karenlampisirpa safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT menneswim safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT penninksandre safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT smithandrew safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT tavarespocasmariadefatima safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT tlustoschristina safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT wolfledetlef safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT zornholger safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT zugravucorinaaurelia safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT dudlervincent safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT gontardnathalie safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT lampieugenia safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT nerincristina safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT papaspyridesconstantine safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT volkkatharina safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials AT milanamariarosaria safetyassessmentoftheprocess4petbasedoneremabasictechnologyusedtorecyclepostconsumerpetintofoodcontactmaterials |