Cargando…
Scientific opinion on an application by Monsanto (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐114) for the placing on the market of a herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified cotton MON 88701 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003
Cotton MON 88701 was developed through Agrobacterium tumefaciens‐mediated transformation to express the dicamba mono‐oxygenase (DMO) protein, conferring tolerance to dicamba, and the phosphinothricin N‐acetyltransferase PAT protein, conferring tolerance to glufosinate ammonium‐based herbicides. The...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625448 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4746 |
_version_ | 1783495800174673920 |
---|---|
author | Naegeli, Hanspeter Birch, Andrew Nicholas Casacuberta, Josep De Schrijver, Adinda Gralak, Mikołaj Antoni Jones, Huw Manachini, Barbara Messéan, Antoine Nielsen, Elsa Ebbesen Nogué, Fabien Robaglia, Christophe Rostoks, Nils Sweet, Jeremy Tebbe, Christoph Visioli, Francesco Wal, Jean‐Michel Poeting, Annette Álvarez, Fernando Broll, Hermann Ramon, Matthew |
author_facet | Naegeli, Hanspeter Birch, Andrew Nicholas Casacuberta, Josep De Schrijver, Adinda Gralak, Mikołaj Antoni Jones, Huw Manachini, Barbara Messéan, Antoine Nielsen, Elsa Ebbesen Nogué, Fabien Robaglia, Christophe Rostoks, Nils Sweet, Jeremy Tebbe, Christoph Visioli, Francesco Wal, Jean‐Michel Poeting, Annette Álvarez, Fernando Broll, Hermann Ramon, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cotton MON 88701 was developed through Agrobacterium tumefaciens‐mediated transformation to express the dicamba mono‐oxygenase (DMO) protein, conferring tolerance to dicamba, and the phosphinothricin N‐acetyltransferase PAT protein, conferring tolerance to glufosinate ammonium‐based herbicides. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatics analyses did not identify issues requiring further assessment for food/feed safety. The agronomic and phenotypic characteristics tested revealed no relevant differences between cotton MON 88701 and its conventional counterpart. Since complete compositional results were reported for only three sites, the EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) is not in the position to complete the assessment of the compositional analysis. Moreover, as no 28‐day toxicity study in rodents on the MON 88701 DMO protein was provided, the GMO Panel is not in the position to complete the safety assessment of this protein in cotton MON 88701. Consequently, the GMO Panel cannot complete the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment of food/feed derived from cotton MON 88701. The safety assessment identified no concerns regarding the potential toxicity and allergenicity of the PAT protein newly expressed in cotton MON 88701. Considering the routes of exposure and limited exposure levels, the GMO Panel concludes that cotton MON 88701 would not give rise to safety concerns in the event of accidental release of viable seeds into the environment. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of cotton MON 88701. In conclusion, in the absence of an appropriate comparative assessment and an appropriate assessment of the MON 88701 DMO protein, the GMO Panel is not in a position to complete its food/feed risk assessment of cotton MON 88701. The GMO Panel concludes that the cotton MON 88701 is unlikely to have any adverse effect on the environment in the context of the scope of the application. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7010045 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70100452020-07-02 Scientific opinion on an application by Monsanto (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐114) for the placing on the market of a herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified cotton MON 88701 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 Naegeli, Hanspeter Birch, Andrew Nicholas Casacuberta, Josep De Schrijver, Adinda Gralak, Mikołaj Antoni Jones, Huw Manachini, Barbara Messéan, Antoine Nielsen, Elsa Ebbesen Nogué, Fabien Robaglia, Christophe Rostoks, Nils Sweet, Jeremy Tebbe, Christoph Visioli, Francesco Wal, Jean‐Michel Poeting, Annette Álvarez, Fernando Broll, Hermann Ramon, Matthew EFSA J Scientific Opinion Cotton MON 88701 was developed through Agrobacterium tumefaciens‐mediated transformation to express the dicamba mono‐oxygenase (DMO) protein, conferring tolerance to dicamba, and the phosphinothricin N‐acetyltransferase PAT protein, conferring tolerance to glufosinate ammonium‐based herbicides. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatics analyses did not identify issues requiring further assessment for food/feed safety. The agronomic and phenotypic characteristics tested revealed no relevant differences between cotton MON 88701 and its conventional counterpart. Since complete compositional results were reported for only three sites, the EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) is not in the position to complete the assessment of the compositional analysis. Moreover, as no 28‐day toxicity study in rodents on the MON 88701 DMO protein was provided, the GMO Panel is not in the position to complete the safety assessment of this protein in cotton MON 88701. Consequently, the GMO Panel cannot complete the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment of food/feed derived from cotton MON 88701. The safety assessment identified no concerns regarding the potential toxicity and allergenicity of the PAT protein newly expressed in cotton MON 88701. Considering the routes of exposure and limited exposure levels, the GMO Panel concludes that cotton MON 88701 would not give rise to safety concerns in the event of accidental release of viable seeds into the environment. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of cotton MON 88701. In conclusion, in the absence of an appropriate comparative assessment and an appropriate assessment of the MON 88701 DMO protein, the GMO Panel is not in a position to complete its food/feed risk assessment of cotton MON 88701. The GMO Panel concludes that the cotton MON 88701 is unlikely to have any adverse effect on the environment in the context of the scope of the application. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7010045/ /pubmed/32625448 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4746 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Naegeli, Hanspeter Birch, Andrew Nicholas Casacuberta, Josep De Schrijver, Adinda Gralak, Mikołaj Antoni Jones, Huw Manachini, Barbara Messéan, Antoine Nielsen, Elsa Ebbesen Nogué, Fabien Robaglia, Christophe Rostoks, Nils Sweet, Jeremy Tebbe, Christoph Visioli, Francesco Wal, Jean‐Michel Poeting, Annette Álvarez, Fernando Broll, Hermann Ramon, Matthew Scientific opinion on an application by Monsanto (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐114) for the placing on the market of a herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified cotton MON 88701 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 |
title | Scientific opinion on an application by Monsanto (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐114) for the placing on the market of a herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified cotton MON 88701 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 |
title_full | Scientific opinion on an application by Monsanto (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐114) for the placing on the market of a herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified cotton MON 88701 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 |
title_fullStr | Scientific opinion on an application by Monsanto (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐114) for the placing on the market of a herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified cotton MON 88701 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 |
title_full_unstemmed | Scientific opinion on an application by Monsanto (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐114) for the placing on the market of a herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified cotton MON 88701 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 |
title_short | Scientific opinion on an application by Monsanto (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2013‐114) for the placing on the market of a herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified cotton MON 88701 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 |
title_sort | scientific opinion on an application by monsanto (efsa‐gmo‐nl‐2013‐114) for the placing on the market of a herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified cotton mon 88701 for food and feed uses, import and processing under regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625448 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4746 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003 AT naegelihanspeter scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003 AT birchandrewnicholas scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003 AT casacubertajosep scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003 AT deschrijveradinda scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003 AT gralakmikołajantoni scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003 AT joneshuw scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003 AT manachinibarbara scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003 AT messeanantoine scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003 AT nielsenelsaebbesen scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003 AT noguefabien scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003 AT robagliachristophe scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003 AT rostoksnils scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003 AT sweetjeremy scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003 AT tebbechristoph scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003 AT visiolifrancesco scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003 AT waljeanmichel scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003 AT poetingannette scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003 AT alvarezfernando scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003 AT brollhermann scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003 AT ramonmatthew scientificopiniononanapplicationbymonsantoefsagmonl2013114fortheplacingonthemarketofaherbicidetolerantgeneticallymodifiedcottonmon88701forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003 |