Cargando…
Assessment of a decontamination process for dioxins and dioxin‐like PCBs in fish oil by physical filtration with activated carbon
Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) provided a scientific opinion on the assessment of a decontamination process consisting in the adsorption with activated carbon and physical filtration of fish oil in order to reduce the amoun...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625605 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4961 |
_version_ | 1783495806511218688 |
---|---|
author | Knutsen, Helle Katrine Alexander, Jan Barregård, Lars Bignami, Margherita Brüschweiler, Beat Ceccatelli, Sandra Cottrill, Bruce Dinovi, Michael Edler, Lutz Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Oswald, Isabelle P. Petersen, Annette Rose, Martin Roudot, Alain‐Claude Schwerdtle, Tanja Vleminckx, Christiane Vollmer, Günter Wallace, Heather Lundebye, Anne‐Katrine Metzler, Manfred Colombo, Paolo Hogstrand, Christer |
author_facet | Knutsen, Helle Katrine Alexander, Jan Barregård, Lars Bignami, Margherita Brüschweiler, Beat Ceccatelli, Sandra Cottrill, Bruce Dinovi, Michael Edler, Lutz Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Oswald, Isabelle P. Petersen, Annette Rose, Martin Roudot, Alain‐Claude Schwerdtle, Tanja Vleminckx, Christiane Vollmer, Günter Wallace, Heather Lundebye, Anne‐Katrine Metzler, Manfred Colombo, Paolo Hogstrand, Christer |
collection | PubMed |
description | Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) provided a scientific opinion on the assessment of a decontamination process consisting in the adsorption with activated carbon and physical filtration of fish oil in order to reduce the amount of dioxins (polychlorinated dibenzo‐p‐dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs)) and dioxin‐like polychlorinated biphenyls (DL‐PCBs). All feed decontamination processes must comply with the acceptability criteria specified in the Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/786. The data provided by the feed business operator were assessed with respect to the efficacy of the process and on information demonstrating that the process does not adversely affect the characteristics and the nature of the product. As described in scientific literature, the process was effective in removing PCDD/Fs (84%) and DL‐PCBs (55%), and therefore, it is possible to meet the current EU requirements with respect to these contaminants, assuming that the level of contamination of untreated fish oil was within the range of the tested batches. The Panel considered that the reference to information available in published literature was a pragmatic approach to demonstrate that the use of activated carbon adsorption does not lead to any detrimental changes in the nature of the fish oil; however, it was noted that the process could deplete some beneficial constituents (e.g. vitamins). Information was provided to demonstrate the safe disposal of the waste material. The CONTAM Panel concluded that on the basis of the information submitted by the feed business operator the proposed decontamination process to remove dioxins (PCDD/Fs) and DL‐PCBs from the fish oil by means of physical filtration with activated carbon, was compliant with the acceptability criteria provided for in Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/786 of 19 May 2015. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7010074 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70100742020-07-02 Assessment of a decontamination process for dioxins and dioxin‐like PCBs in fish oil by physical filtration with activated carbon Knutsen, Helle Katrine Alexander, Jan Barregård, Lars Bignami, Margherita Brüschweiler, Beat Ceccatelli, Sandra Cottrill, Bruce Dinovi, Michael Edler, Lutz Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Oswald, Isabelle P. Petersen, Annette Rose, Martin Roudot, Alain‐Claude Schwerdtle, Tanja Vleminckx, Christiane Vollmer, Günter Wallace, Heather Lundebye, Anne‐Katrine Metzler, Manfred Colombo, Paolo Hogstrand, Christer EFSA J Scientific Opinion Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) provided a scientific opinion on the assessment of a decontamination process consisting in the adsorption with activated carbon and physical filtration of fish oil in order to reduce the amount of dioxins (polychlorinated dibenzo‐p‐dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs)) and dioxin‐like polychlorinated biphenyls (DL‐PCBs). All feed decontamination processes must comply with the acceptability criteria specified in the Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/786. The data provided by the feed business operator were assessed with respect to the efficacy of the process and on information demonstrating that the process does not adversely affect the characteristics and the nature of the product. As described in scientific literature, the process was effective in removing PCDD/Fs (84%) and DL‐PCBs (55%), and therefore, it is possible to meet the current EU requirements with respect to these contaminants, assuming that the level of contamination of untreated fish oil was within the range of the tested batches. The Panel considered that the reference to information available in published literature was a pragmatic approach to demonstrate that the use of activated carbon adsorption does not lead to any detrimental changes in the nature of the fish oil; however, it was noted that the process could deplete some beneficial constituents (e.g. vitamins). Information was provided to demonstrate the safe disposal of the waste material. The CONTAM Panel concluded that on the basis of the information submitted by the feed business operator the proposed decontamination process to remove dioxins (PCDD/Fs) and DL‐PCBs from the fish oil by means of physical filtration with activated carbon, was compliant with the acceptability criteria provided for in Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/786 of 19 May 2015. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7010074/ /pubmed/32625605 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4961 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Knutsen, Helle Katrine Alexander, Jan Barregård, Lars Bignami, Margherita Brüschweiler, Beat Ceccatelli, Sandra Cottrill, Bruce Dinovi, Michael Edler, Lutz Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Oswald, Isabelle P. Petersen, Annette Rose, Martin Roudot, Alain‐Claude Schwerdtle, Tanja Vleminckx, Christiane Vollmer, Günter Wallace, Heather Lundebye, Anne‐Katrine Metzler, Manfred Colombo, Paolo Hogstrand, Christer Assessment of a decontamination process for dioxins and dioxin‐like PCBs in fish oil by physical filtration with activated carbon |
title | Assessment of a decontamination process for dioxins and dioxin‐like PCBs in fish oil by physical filtration with activated carbon |
title_full | Assessment of a decontamination process for dioxins and dioxin‐like PCBs in fish oil by physical filtration with activated carbon |
title_fullStr | Assessment of a decontamination process for dioxins and dioxin‐like PCBs in fish oil by physical filtration with activated carbon |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of a decontamination process for dioxins and dioxin‐like PCBs in fish oil by physical filtration with activated carbon |
title_short | Assessment of a decontamination process for dioxins and dioxin‐like PCBs in fish oil by physical filtration with activated carbon |
title_sort | assessment of a decontamination process for dioxins and dioxin‐like pcbs in fish oil by physical filtration with activated carbon |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625605 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4961 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT knutsenhellekatrine assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT alexanderjan assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT barregardlars assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT bignamimargherita assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT bruschweilerbeat assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT ceccatellisandra assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT cottrillbruce assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT dinovimichael assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT edlerlutz assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT graslkrauppbettina assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT hoogenboomlaurentiusron assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT nebbiacarlostefano assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT oswaldisabellep assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT petersenannette assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT rosemartin assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT roudotalainclaude assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT schwerdtletanja assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT vleminckxchristiane assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT vollmergunter assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT wallaceheather assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT lundebyeannekatrine assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT metzlermanfred assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT colombopaolo assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon AT hogstrandchrister assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon |