Cargando…

Re‐evaluation of sodium nitrate (E 251) and potassium nitrate (E 252) as food additives

The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provided a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of sodium nitrate (E 251) and potassium nitrate (E 252) when used as food additives. The current acceptable daily intakes (ADIs) for nitrate of 3.7 mg/kg body weight (bw) per d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mortensen, Alicja, Aguilar, Fernando, Crebelli, Riccardo, Di Domenico, Alessandro, Dusemund, Birgit, Frutos, Maria Jose, Galtier, Pierre, Gott, David, Gundert‐Remy, Ursula, Lambré, Claude, Leblanc, Jean‐Charles, Lindtner, Oliver, Moldeus, Peter, Mosesso, Pasquale, Oskarsson, Agneta, Parent‐Massin, Dominique, Stankovic, Ivan, Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine, Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius, Wright, Matthew, van den Brandt, Piet, Fortes, Cristina, Merino, Leonardo, Toldrà, Fidel, Arcella, Davide, Christodoulidou, Anna, Barrucci, Federica, Garcia, Ana, Pizzo, Fabiola, Battacchi, Dario, Younes, Maged
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625505
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4787
_version_ 1783495809318256640
author Mortensen, Alicja
Aguilar, Fernando
Crebelli, Riccardo
Di Domenico, Alessandro
Dusemund, Birgit
Frutos, Maria Jose
Galtier, Pierre
Gott, David
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Lambré, Claude
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Lindtner, Oliver
Moldeus, Peter
Mosesso, Pasquale
Oskarsson, Agneta
Parent‐Massin, Dominique
Stankovic, Ivan
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius
Wright, Matthew
van den Brandt, Piet
Fortes, Cristina
Merino, Leonardo
Toldrà, Fidel
Arcella, Davide
Christodoulidou, Anna
Barrucci, Federica
Garcia, Ana
Pizzo, Fabiola
Battacchi, Dario
Younes, Maged
author_facet Mortensen, Alicja
Aguilar, Fernando
Crebelli, Riccardo
Di Domenico, Alessandro
Dusemund, Birgit
Frutos, Maria Jose
Galtier, Pierre
Gott, David
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Lambré, Claude
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Lindtner, Oliver
Moldeus, Peter
Mosesso, Pasquale
Oskarsson, Agneta
Parent‐Massin, Dominique
Stankovic, Ivan
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius
Wright, Matthew
van den Brandt, Piet
Fortes, Cristina
Merino, Leonardo
Toldrà, Fidel
Arcella, Davide
Christodoulidou, Anna
Barrucci, Federica
Garcia, Ana
Pizzo, Fabiola
Battacchi, Dario
Younes, Maged
collection PubMed
description The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provided a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of sodium nitrate (E 251) and potassium nitrate (E 252) when used as food additives. The current acceptable daily intakes (ADIs) for nitrate of 3.7 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day were established by the SCF (1997) and JECFA (2002). The available data did not indicate genotoxic potential for sodium and potassium nitrate. The carcinogenicity studies in mice and rats were negative. The Panel considered the derivation of an ADI for nitrate based on the formation of methaemoglobin, following the conversion of nitrate, excreted in the saliva, to nitrite. However, there were large variations in the data on the nitrate‐to‐nitrite conversion in the saliva in humans. Therefore, the Panel considered that it was not possible to derive a single value of the ADI from the available data. The Panel noticed that even using the highest nitrate‐to‐nitrite conversion factor the methaemoglobin levels produced due to nitrite obtained from this conversion would not be clinically significant and would result to a theoretically estimated endogenous N‐nitroso compounds (ENOC) production at levels which would be of low concern. Hence, and despite the uncertainty associated with the ADI established by the SCF, the Panel concluded that currently there was insufficient evidence to withdraw this ADI. The exposure to nitrate solely from its use as a food additive was estimated to be less than 5% of the overall exposure to nitrate in food based on a refined estimated exposure scenario. This exposure did not exceed the current ADI (SCF, 1997). However, if all sources of exposure to dietary nitrate are considered (food additive, natural presence and contamination), the ADI would be exceeded for all age groups at the mean and the highest exposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7010087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70100872020-07-02 Re‐evaluation of sodium nitrate (E 251) and potassium nitrate (E 252) as food additives Mortensen, Alicja Aguilar, Fernando Crebelli, Riccardo Di Domenico, Alessandro Dusemund, Birgit Frutos, Maria Jose Galtier, Pierre Gott, David Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Lambré, Claude Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Lindtner, Oliver Moldeus, Peter Mosesso, Pasquale Oskarsson, Agneta Parent‐Massin, Dominique Stankovic, Ivan Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius Wright, Matthew van den Brandt, Piet Fortes, Cristina Merino, Leonardo Toldrà, Fidel Arcella, Davide Christodoulidou, Anna Barrucci, Federica Garcia, Ana Pizzo, Fabiola Battacchi, Dario Younes, Maged EFSA J Scientific Opinion The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provided a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of sodium nitrate (E 251) and potassium nitrate (E 252) when used as food additives. The current acceptable daily intakes (ADIs) for nitrate of 3.7 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day were established by the SCF (1997) and JECFA (2002). The available data did not indicate genotoxic potential for sodium and potassium nitrate. The carcinogenicity studies in mice and rats were negative. The Panel considered the derivation of an ADI for nitrate based on the formation of methaemoglobin, following the conversion of nitrate, excreted in the saliva, to nitrite. However, there were large variations in the data on the nitrate‐to‐nitrite conversion in the saliva in humans. Therefore, the Panel considered that it was not possible to derive a single value of the ADI from the available data. The Panel noticed that even using the highest nitrate‐to‐nitrite conversion factor the methaemoglobin levels produced due to nitrite obtained from this conversion would not be clinically significant and would result to a theoretically estimated endogenous N‐nitroso compounds (ENOC) production at levels which would be of low concern. Hence, and despite the uncertainty associated with the ADI established by the SCF, the Panel concluded that currently there was insufficient evidence to withdraw this ADI. The exposure to nitrate solely from its use as a food additive was estimated to be less than 5% of the overall exposure to nitrate in food based on a refined estimated exposure scenario. This exposure did not exceed the current ADI (SCF, 1997). However, if all sources of exposure to dietary nitrate are considered (food additive, natural presence and contamination), the ADI would be exceeded for all age groups at the mean and the highest exposure. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7010087/ /pubmed/32625505 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4787 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Mortensen, Alicja
Aguilar, Fernando
Crebelli, Riccardo
Di Domenico, Alessandro
Dusemund, Birgit
Frutos, Maria Jose
Galtier, Pierre
Gott, David
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Lambré, Claude
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Lindtner, Oliver
Moldeus, Peter
Mosesso, Pasquale
Oskarsson, Agneta
Parent‐Massin, Dominique
Stankovic, Ivan
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius
Wright, Matthew
van den Brandt, Piet
Fortes, Cristina
Merino, Leonardo
Toldrà, Fidel
Arcella, Davide
Christodoulidou, Anna
Barrucci, Federica
Garcia, Ana
Pizzo, Fabiola
Battacchi, Dario
Younes, Maged
Re‐evaluation of sodium nitrate (E 251) and potassium nitrate (E 252) as food additives
title Re‐evaluation of sodium nitrate (E 251) and potassium nitrate (E 252) as food additives
title_full Re‐evaluation of sodium nitrate (E 251) and potassium nitrate (E 252) as food additives
title_fullStr Re‐evaluation of sodium nitrate (E 251) and potassium nitrate (E 252) as food additives
title_full_unstemmed Re‐evaluation of sodium nitrate (E 251) and potassium nitrate (E 252) as food additives
title_short Re‐evaluation of sodium nitrate (E 251) and potassium nitrate (E 252) as food additives
title_sort re‐evaluation of sodium nitrate (e 251) and potassium nitrate (e 252) as food additives
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625505
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4787
work_keys_str_mv AT reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT mortensenalicja reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT aguilarfernando reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT crebelliriccardo reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT didomenicoalessandro reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT dusemundbirgit reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT frutosmariajose reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT galtierpierre reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT gottdavid reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT gundertremyursula reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT lambreclaude reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT leblancjeancharles reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT lindtneroliver reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT moldeuspeter reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT mosessopasquale reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT oskarssonagneta reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT parentmassindominique reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT stankovicivan reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT waalkensberendsenine reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT woutersenrudolfantonius reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT wrightmatthew reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT vandenbrandtpiet reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT fortescristina reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT merinoleonardo reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT toldrafidel reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT arcelladavide reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT christodoulidouanna reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT barruccifederica reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT garciaana reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT pizzofabiola reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT battacchidario reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives
AT younesmaged reevaluationofsodiumnitratee251andpotassiumnitratee252asfoodadditives