Cargando…
Scientific motivations and criteria to consider updating EFSA scientific assessments
EFSA is committed to assess and communicate the risks occurring in the food and feed chain from farm to fork and to provide other forms of scientific advice. This work, carried out by EFSA since its inception, has resulted in the adoption of thousands of scientific assessments. EFSA is obliged to re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625443 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4737 |
_version_ | 1783495813348982784 |
---|---|
author | Hardy, Anthony Benford, Diane Halldorsson, Thorhallur Jeger, Michael John Knutsen, Katrine Helle More, Simon Mortensen, Alicja Naegeli, Hanspeter Noteborn, Hubert Ockleford, Colin Ricci, Antonia Rychen, Guido Schlatter, Josep R. Silano, Vittorio Solecki, Roland Turck, Dominique Brock, Theo Chesson, Andrew Karenlampi, Sirpa Lambre, Claude Sanz, Yolande Goumperis, Tilemachos Kleiner, Juliane Maurici, Daniela |
author_facet | Hardy, Anthony Benford, Diane Halldorsson, Thorhallur Jeger, Michael John Knutsen, Katrine Helle More, Simon Mortensen, Alicja Naegeli, Hanspeter Noteborn, Hubert Ockleford, Colin Ricci, Antonia Rychen, Guido Schlatter, Josep R. Silano, Vittorio Solecki, Roland Turck, Dominique Brock, Theo Chesson, Andrew Karenlampi, Sirpa Lambre, Claude Sanz, Yolande Goumperis, Tilemachos Kleiner, Juliane Maurici, Daniela |
collection | PubMed |
description | EFSA is committed to assess and communicate the risks occurring in the food and feed chain from farm to fork and to provide other forms of scientific advice. This work, carried out by EFSA since its inception, has resulted in the adoption of thousands of scientific assessments. EFSA is obliged to re‐assess past assessments in specific regulatory contexts such as those on food and feed additives, active substances in plant protection products and genetically modified food and feed. In other sectors, the consideration for updating past EFSA scientific assessments is taken on an ad hoc basis mainly depending on specific requests by risk managers or on EFSA self‐tasking. If safety is potentially at stake in any area within EFSA's remit, the readiness to update past scientific assessments is important to keep EFSA at the forefront of science and to promote an effective risk assessment. Although this task might be very complex and resource demanding, it is fundamental to EFSA's mission. The present EFSA Scientific Committee opinion deals with scientific motivations and criteria to contribute to the timely updating of EFSA scientific assessments. It is recognised that the decision for updating should be agreed following careful consideration of all the relevant elements by the EFSA management, in collaboration with risk managers and stakeholders. The present opinion addresses the scientific approaches through which it would be possible for EFSA to increase the speed and effectiveness of the acquisition of new data, as well as, to improve the consequent evaluations to assess the relevance and reliability of new data in the context of contributing to the better definition of whether to update past scientific assessments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7010104 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70101042020-07-02 Scientific motivations and criteria to consider updating EFSA scientific assessments Hardy, Anthony Benford, Diane Halldorsson, Thorhallur Jeger, Michael John Knutsen, Katrine Helle More, Simon Mortensen, Alicja Naegeli, Hanspeter Noteborn, Hubert Ockleford, Colin Ricci, Antonia Rychen, Guido Schlatter, Josep R. Silano, Vittorio Solecki, Roland Turck, Dominique Brock, Theo Chesson, Andrew Karenlampi, Sirpa Lambre, Claude Sanz, Yolande Goumperis, Tilemachos Kleiner, Juliane Maurici, Daniela EFSA J Scientific Opinion EFSA is committed to assess and communicate the risks occurring in the food and feed chain from farm to fork and to provide other forms of scientific advice. This work, carried out by EFSA since its inception, has resulted in the adoption of thousands of scientific assessments. EFSA is obliged to re‐assess past assessments in specific regulatory contexts such as those on food and feed additives, active substances in plant protection products and genetically modified food and feed. In other sectors, the consideration for updating past EFSA scientific assessments is taken on an ad hoc basis mainly depending on specific requests by risk managers or on EFSA self‐tasking. If safety is potentially at stake in any area within EFSA's remit, the readiness to update past scientific assessments is important to keep EFSA at the forefront of science and to promote an effective risk assessment. Although this task might be very complex and resource demanding, it is fundamental to EFSA's mission. The present EFSA Scientific Committee opinion deals with scientific motivations and criteria to contribute to the timely updating of EFSA scientific assessments. It is recognised that the decision for updating should be agreed following careful consideration of all the relevant elements by the EFSA management, in collaboration with risk managers and stakeholders. The present opinion addresses the scientific approaches through which it would be possible for EFSA to increase the speed and effectiveness of the acquisition of new data, as well as, to improve the consequent evaluations to assess the relevance and reliability of new data in the context of contributing to the better definition of whether to update past scientific assessments. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7010104/ /pubmed/32625443 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4737 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Hardy, Anthony Benford, Diane Halldorsson, Thorhallur Jeger, Michael John Knutsen, Katrine Helle More, Simon Mortensen, Alicja Naegeli, Hanspeter Noteborn, Hubert Ockleford, Colin Ricci, Antonia Rychen, Guido Schlatter, Josep R. Silano, Vittorio Solecki, Roland Turck, Dominique Brock, Theo Chesson, Andrew Karenlampi, Sirpa Lambre, Claude Sanz, Yolande Goumperis, Tilemachos Kleiner, Juliane Maurici, Daniela Scientific motivations and criteria to consider updating EFSA scientific assessments |
title | Scientific motivations and criteria to consider updating EFSA scientific assessments |
title_full | Scientific motivations and criteria to consider updating EFSA scientific assessments |
title_fullStr | Scientific motivations and criteria to consider updating EFSA scientific assessments |
title_full_unstemmed | Scientific motivations and criteria to consider updating EFSA scientific assessments |
title_short | Scientific motivations and criteria to consider updating EFSA scientific assessments |
title_sort | scientific motivations and criteria to consider updating efsa scientific assessments |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625443 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4737 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT hardyanthony scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT benforddiane scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT halldorssonthorhallur scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT jegermichaeljohn scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT knutsenkatrinehelle scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT moresimon scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT mortensenalicja scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT naegelihanspeter scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT notebornhubert scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT ocklefordcolin scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT ricciantonia scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT rychenguido scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT schlatterjosepr scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT silanovittorio scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT soleckiroland scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT turckdominique scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT brocktheo scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT chessonandrew scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT karenlampisirpa scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT lambreclaude scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT sanzyolande scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT goumperistilemachos scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT kleinerjuliane scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments AT mauricidaniela scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments |