Cargando…

Scientific motivations and criteria to consider updating EFSA scientific assessments

EFSA is committed to assess and communicate the risks occurring in the food and feed chain from farm to fork and to provide other forms of scientific advice. This work, carried out by EFSA since its inception, has resulted in the adoption of thousands of scientific assessments. EFSA is obliged to re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hardy, Anthony, Benford, Diane, Halldorsson, Thorhallur, Jeger, Michael John, Knutsen, Katrine Helle, More, Simon, Mortensen, Alicja, Naegeli, Hanspeter, Noteborn, Hubert, Ockleford, Colin, Ricci, Antonia, Rychen, Guido, Schlatter, Josep R., Silano, Vittorio, Solecki, Roland, Turck, Dominique, Brock, Theo, Chesson, Andrew, Karenlampi, Sirpa, Lambre, Claude, Sanz, Yolande, Goumperis, Tilemachos, Kleiner, Juliane, Maurici, Daniela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625443
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4737
_version_ 1783495813348982784
author Hardy, Anthony
Benford, Diane
Halldorsson, Thorhallur
Jeger, Michael John
Knutsen, Katrine Helle
More, Simon
Mortensen, Alicja
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Noteborn, Hubert
Ockleford, Colin
Ricci, Antonia
Rychen, Guido
Schlatter, Josep R.
Silano, Vittorio
Solecki, Roland
Turck, Dominique
Brock, Theo
Chesson, Andrew
Karenlampi, Sirpa
Lambre, Claude
Sanz, Yolande
Goumperis, Tilemachos
Kleiner, Juliane
Maurici, Daniela
author_facet Hardy, Anthony
Benford, Diane
Halldorsson, Thorhallur
Jeger, Michael John
Knutsen, Katrine Helle
More, Simon
Mortensen, Alicja
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Noteborn, Hubert
Ockleford, Colin
Ricci, Antonia
Rychen, Guido
Schlatter, Josep R.
Silano, Vittorio
Solecki, Roland
Turck, Dominique
Brock, Theo
Chesson, Andrew
Karenlampi, Sirpa
Lambre, Claude
Sanz, Yolande
Goumperis, Tilemachos
Kleiner, Juliane
Maurici, Daniela
collection PubMed
description EFSA is committed to assess and communicate the risks occurring in the food and feed chain from farm to fork and to provide other forms of scientific advice. This work, carried out by EFSA since its inception, has resulted in the adoption of thousands of scientific assessments. EFSA is obliged to re‐assess past assessments in specific regulatory contexts such as those on food and feed additives, active substances in plant protection products and genetically modified food and feed. In other sectors, the consideration for updating past EFSA scientific assessments is taken on an ad hoc basis mainly depending on specific requests by risk managers or on EFSA self‐tasking. If safety is potentially at stake in any area within EFSA's remit, the readiness to update past scientific assessments is important to keep EFSA at the forefront of science and to promote an effective risk assessment. Although this task might be very complex and resource demanding, it is fundamental to EFSA's mission. The present EFSA Scientific Committee opinion deals with scientific motivations and criteria to contribute to the timely updating of EFSA scientific assessments. It is recognised that the decision for updating should be agreed following careful consideration of all the relevant elements by the EFSA management, in collaboration with risk managers and stakeholders. The present opinion addresses the scientific approaches through which it would be possible for EFSA to increase the speed and effectiveness of the acquisition of new data, as well as, to improve the consequent evaluations to assess the relevance and reliability of new data in the context of contributing to the better definition of whether to update past scientific assessments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7010104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70101042020-07-02 Scientific motivations and criteria to consider updating EFSA scientific assessments Hardy, Anthony Benford, Diane Halldorsson, Thorhallur Jeger, Michael John Knutsen, Katrine Helle More, Simon Mortensen, Alicja Naegeli, Hanspeter Noteborn, Hubert Ockleford, Colin Ricci, Antonia Rychen, Guido Schlatter, Josep R. Silano, Vittorio Solecki, Roland Turck, Dominique Brock, Theo Chesson, Andrew Karenlampi, Sirpa Lambre, Claude Sanz, Yolande Goumperis, Tilemachos Kleiner, Juliane Maurici, Daniela EFSA J Scientific Opinion EFSA is committed to assess and communicate the risks occurring in the food and feed chain from farm to fork and to provide other forms of scientific advice. This work, carried out by EFSA since its inception, has resulted in the adoption of thousands of scientific assessments. EFSA is obliged to re‐assess past assessments in specific regulatory contexts such as those on food and feed additives, active substances in plant protection products and genetically modified food and feed. In other sectors, the consideration for updating past EFSA scientific assessments is taken on an ad hoc basis mainly depending on specific requests by risk managers or on EFSA self‐tasking. If safety is potentially at stake in any area within EFSA's remit, the readiness to update past scientific assessments is important to keep EFSA at the forefront of science and to promote an effective risk assessment. Although this task might be very complex and resource demanding, it is fundamental to EFSA's mission. The present EFSA Scientific Committee opinion deals with scientific motivations and criteria to contribute to the timely updating of EFSA scientific assessments. It is recognised that the decision for updating should be agreed following careful consideration of all the relevant elements by the EFSA management, in collaboration with risk managers and stakeholders. The present opinion addresses the scientific approaches through which it would be possible for EFSA to increase the speed and effectiveness of the acquisition of new data, as well as, to improve the consequent evaluations to assess the relevance and reliability of new data in the context of contributing to the better definition of whether to update past scientific assessments. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7010104/ /pubmed/32625443 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4737 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Hardy, Anthony
Benford, Diane
Halldorsson, Thorhallur
Jeger, Michael John
Knutsen, Katrine Helle
More, Simon
Mortensen, Alicja
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Noteborn, Hubert
Ockleford, Colin
Ricci, Antonia
Rychen, Guido
Schlatter, Josep R.
Silano, Vittorio
Solecki, Roland
Turck, Dominique
Brock, Theo
Chesson, Andrew
Karenlampi, Sirpa
Lambre, Claude
Sanz, Yolande
Goumperis, Tilemachos
Kleiner, Juliane
Maurici, Daniela
Scientific motivations and criteria to consider updating EFSA scientific assessments
title Scientific motivations and criteria to consider updating EFSA scientific assessments
title_full Scientific motivations and criteria to consider updating EFSA scientific assessments
title_fullStr Scientific motivations and criteria to consider updating EFSA scientific assessments
title_full_unstemmed Scientific motivations and criteria to consider updating EFSA scientific assessments
title_short Scientific motivations and criteria to consider updating EFSA scientific assessments
title_sort scientific motivations and criteria to consider updating efsa scientific assessments
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625443
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4737
work_keys_str_mv AT scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT hardyanthony scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT benforddiane scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT halldorssonthorhallur scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT jegermichaeljohn scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT knutsenkatrinehelle scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT moresimon scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT mortensenalicja scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT naegelihanspeter scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT notebornhubert scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT ocklefordcolin scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT ricciantonia scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT rychenguido scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT schlatterjosepr scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT silanovittorio scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT soleckiroland scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT turckdominique scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT brocktheo scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT chessonandrew scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT karenlampisirpa scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT lambreclaude scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT sanzyolande scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT goumperistilemachos scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT kleinerjuliane scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments
AT mauricidaniela scientificmotivationsandcriteriatoconsiderupdatingefsascientificassessments