Cargando…

Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 226 Revision 1 (FGE.226Rev1): consideration of genotoxicity data on one α,β‐unsaturated aldehyde from chemical subgroup 1.1.1(b) of FGE.19

The EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids was requested to evaluate the genotoxic potential of one flavouring substance from subgroup 1.1.1(b) of FGE.19 in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 226 (FGE.226). The flavour industry provided genotoxicity studies for t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silano, Vittorio, Bolognesi, Claudia, Castle, Laurence, Cravedi, Jean‐Pierre, Engel, Karl‐Heinz, Fowler, Paul, Franz, Roland, Grob, Konrad, Husøy, Trine, Kärenlampi, Sirpa, Mennes, Wim, Milana, Maria Rosaria, Penninks, André, Smith, Andrew, Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima, Tlustos, Christina, Wölfle, Detlef, Zorn, Holger, Zugravu, Corina‐Aurelia, Binderup, Mona‐Lise, Crebelli, Riccardo, Marcon, Francesca, Marzin, Daniel, Mosesso, Pasquale, Anastassiadou, Maria, Carfì, Maria, Saarma, Siiri, Gürtler, Rainer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625501
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4847
_version_ 1783495818990321664
author Silano, Vittorio
Bolognesi, Claudia
Castle, Laurence
Cravedi, Jean‐Pierre
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Franz, Roland
Grob, Konrad
Husøy, Trine
Kärenlampi, Sirpa
Mennes, Wim
Milana, Maria Rosaria
Penninks, André
Smith, Andrew
Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima
Tlustos, Christina
Wölfle, Detlef
Zorn, Holger
Zugravu, Corina‐Aurelia
Binderup, Mona‐Lise
Crebelli, Riccardo
Marcon, Francesca
Marzin, Daniel
Mosesso, Pasquale
Anastassiadou, Maria
Carfì, Maria
Saarma, Siiri
Gürtler, Rainer
author_facet Silano, Vittorio
Bolognesi, Claudia
Castle, Laurence
Cravedi, Jean‐Pierre
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Franz, Roland
Grob, Konrad
Husøy, Trine
Kärenlampi, Sirpa
Mennes, Wim
Milana, Maria Rosaria
Penninks, André
Smith, Andrew
Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima
Tlustos, Christina
Wölfle, Detlef
Zorn, Holger
Zugravu, Corina‐Aurelia
Binderup, Mona‐Lise
Crebelli, Riccardo
Marcon, Francesca
Marzin, Daniel
Mosesso, Pasquale
Anastassiadou, Maria
Carfì, Maria
Saarma, Siiri
Gürtler, Rainer
collection PubMed
description The EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids was requested to evaluate the genotoxic potential of one flavouring substance from subgroup 1.1.1(b) of FGE.19 in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 226 (FGE.226). The flavour industry provided genotoxicity studies for the substance 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal [FL‐no: 16.071]. Based on these data, the Panel concluded in FGE.226 that 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal did not induce gene mutations in bacterial cells but was positive in an in vitro micronucleus assay, so, 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal is considered an in vitro genotoxic agent. The negative results obtained in an in vivo micronucleus assay cannot overrule the positive results of the in vitro micronucleus assay with and without S9‐mix due to the lack of demonstration of bone marrow exposure. Following this, the flavour industry has provided plasma analysis of a satellite group of rats treated with 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal in order to investigate the systemic exposure of animals in the in vivo micronucleus assay. However, the plasma analysis did not provide enough evidence of target tissue exposure. An in vivo Comet assay in rodents was recommended in FGE.226, in order to investigate possible genotoxic effects at the first site of contact (e.g. stomach/duodenum cells) and in the liver. An in vivo Comet assay in liver and duodenum was provided that suggests that 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal [FL‐no: 16.071] did not induce DNA damage in the duodenum of rats. However, the genotoxic effect observed in vitro was confirmed in the in vivo Comet assay in the liver of rats. The Panel concluded that 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal [FL‐no: 16.071] does raise a safety concern with respect to genotoxicity and, therefore, it cannot be evaluated according to the Procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7010128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70101282020-07-02 Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 226 Revision 1 (FGE.226Rev1): consideration of genotoxicity data on one α,β‐unsaturated aldehyde from chemical subgroup 1.1.1(b) of FGE.19 Silano, Vittorio Bolognesi, Claudia Castle, Laurence Cravedi, Jean‐Pierre Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Franz, Roland Grob, Konrad Husøy, Trine Kärenlampi, Sirpa Mennes, Wim Milana, Maria Rosaria Penninks, André Smith, Andrew Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima Tlustos, Christina Wölfle, Detlef Zorn, Holger Zugravu, Corina‐Aurelia Binderup, Mona‐Lise Crebelli, Riccardo Marcon, Francesca Marzin, Daniel Mosesso, Pasquale Anastassiadou, Maria Carfì, Maria Saarma, Siiri Gürtler, Rainer EFSA J Scientific Opinion The EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids was requested to evaluate the genotoxic potential of one flavouring substance from subgroup 1.1.1(b) of FGE.19 in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 226 (FGE.226). The flavour industry provided genotoxicity studies for the substance 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal [FL‐no: 16.071]. Based on these data, the Panel concluded in FGE.226 that 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal did not induce gene mutations in bacterial cells but was positive in an in vitro micronucleus assay, so, 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal is considered an in vitro genotoxic agent. The negative results obtained in an in vivo micronucleus assay cannot overrule the positive results of the in vitro micronucleus assay with and without S9‐mix due to the lack of demonstration of bone marrow exposure. Following this, the flavour industry has provided plasma analysis of a satellite group of rats treated with 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal in order to investigate the systemic exposure of animals in the in vivo micronucleus assay. However, the plasma analysis did not provide enough evidence of target tissue exposure. An in vivo Comet assay in rodents was recommended in FGE.226, in order to investigate possible genotoxic effects at the first site of contact (e.g. stomach/duodenum cells) and in the liver. An in vivo Comet assay in liver and duodenum was provided that suggests that 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal [FL‐no: 16.071] did not induce DNA damage in the duodenum of rats. However, the genotoxic effect observed in vitro was confirmed in the in vivo Comet assay in the liver of rats. The Panel concluded that 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal [FL‐no: 16.071] does raise a safety concern with respect to genotoxicity and, therefore, it cannot be evaluated according to the Procedure. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7010128/ /pubmed/32625501 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4847 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Silano, Vittorio
Bolognesi, Claudia
Castle, Laurence
Cravedi, Jean‐Pierre
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Franz, Roland
Grob, Konrad
Husøy, Trine
Kärenlampi, Sirpa
Mennes, Wim
Milana, Maria Rosaria
Penninks, André
Smith, Andrew
Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima
Tlustos, Christina
Wölfle, Detlef
Zorn, Holger
Zugravu, Corina‐Aurelia
Binderup, Mona‐Lise
Crebelli, Riccardo
Marcon, Francesca
Marzin, Daniel
Mosesso, Pasquale
Anastassiadou, Maria
Carfì, Maria
Saarma, Siiri
Gürtler, Rainer
Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 226 Revision 1 (FGE.226Rev1): consideration of genotoxicity data on one α,β‐unsaturated aldehyde from chemical subgroup 1.1.1(b) of FGE.19
title Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 226 Revision 1 (FGE.226Rev1): consideration of genotoxicity data on one α,β‐unsaturated aldehyde from chemical subgroup 1.1.1(b) of FGE.19
title_full Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 226 Revision 1 (FGE.226Rev1): consideration of genotoxicity data on one α,β‐unsaturated aldehyde from chemical subgroup 1.1.1(b) of FGE.19
title_fullStr Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 226 Revision 1 (FGE.226Rev1): consideration of genotoxicity data on one α,β‐unsaturated aldehyde from chemical subgroup 1.1.1(b) of FGE.19
title_full_unstemmed Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 226 Revision 1 (FGE.226Rev1): consideration of genotoxicity data on one α,β‐unsaturated aldehyde from chemical subgroup 1.1.1(b) of FGE.19
title_short Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 226 Revision 1 (FGE.226Rev1): consideration of genotoxicity data on one α,β‐unsaturated aldehyde from chemical subgroup 1.1.1(b) of FGE.19
title_sort scientific opinion on flavouring group evaluation 226 revision 1 (fge.226rev1): consideration of genotoxicity data on one α,β‐unsaturated aldehyde from chemical subgroup 1.1.1(b) of fge.19
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625501
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4847
work_keys_str_mv AT scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT silanovittorio scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT bolognesiclaudia scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT castlelaurence scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT cravedijeanpierre scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT engelkarlheinz scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT fowlerpaul scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT franzroland scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT grobkonrad scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT husøytrine scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT karenlampisirpa scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT menneswim scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT milanamariarosaria scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT penninksandre scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT smithandrew scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT tavarespocasmariadefatima scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT tlustoschristina scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT wolfledetlef scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT zornholger scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT zugravucorinaaurelia scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT binderupmonalise scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT crebelliriccardo scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT marconfrancesca scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT marzindaniel scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT mosessopasquale scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT anastassiadoumaria scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT carfimaria scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT saarmasiiri scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19
AT gurtlerrainer scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19