Cargando…
Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 226 Revision 1 (FGE.226Rev1): consideration of genotoxicity data on one α,β‐unsaturated aldehyde from chemical subgroup 1.1.1(b) of FGE.19
The EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids was requested to evaluate the genotoxic potential of one flavouring substance from subgroup 1.1.1(b) of FGE.19 in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 226 (FGE.226). The flavour industry provided genotoxicity studies for t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625501 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4847 |
_version_ | 1783495818990321664 |
---|---|
author | Silano, Vittorio Bolognesi, Claudia Castle, Laurence Cravedi, Jean‐Pierre Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Franz, Roland Grob, Konrad Husøy, Trine Kärenlampi, Sirpa Mennes, Wim Milana, Maria Rosaria Penninks, André Smith, Andrew Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima Tlustos, Christina Wölfle, Detlef Zorn, Holger Zugravu, Corina‐Aurelia Binderup, Mona‐Lise Crebelli, Riccardo Marcon, Francesca Marzin, Daniel Mosesso, Pasquale Anastassiadou, Maria Carfì, Maria Saarma, Siiri Gürtler, Rainer |
author_facet | Silano, Vittorio Bolognesi, Claudia Castle, Laurence Cravedi, Jean‐Pierre Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Franz, Roland Grob, Konrad Husøy, Trine Kärenlampi, Sirpa Mennes, Wim Milana, Maria Rosaria Penninks, André Smith, Andrew Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima Tlustos, Christina Wölfle, Detlef Zorn, Holger Zugravu, Corina‐Aurelia Binderup, Mona‐Lise Crebelli, Riccardo Marcon, Francesca Marzin, Daniel Mosesso, Pasquale Anastassiadou, Maria Carfì, Maria Saarma, Siiri Gürtler, Rainer |
collection | PubMed |
description | The EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids was requested to evaluate the genotoxic potential of one flavouring substance from subgroup 1.1.1(b) of FGE.19 in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 226 (FGE.226). The flavour industry provided genotoxicity studies for the substance 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal [FL‐no: 16.071]. Based on these data, the Panel concluded in FGE.226 that 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal did not induce gene mutations in bacterial cells but was positive in an in vitro micronucleus assay, so, 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal is considered an in vitro genotoxic agent. The negative results obtained in an in vivo micronucleus assay cannot overrule the positive results of the in vitro micronucleus assay with and without S9‐mix due to the lack of demonstration of bone marrow exposure. Following this, the flavour industry has provided plasma analysis of a satellite group of rats treated with 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal in order to investigate the systemic exposure of animals in the in vivo micronucleus assay. However, the plasma analysis did not provide enough evidence of target tissue exposure. An in vivo Comet assay in rodents was recommended in FGE.226, in order to investigate possible genotoxic effects at the first site of contact (e.g. stomach/duodenum cells) and in the liver. An in vivo Comet assay in liver and duodenum was provided that suggests that 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal [FL‐no: 16.071] did not induce DNA damage in the duodenum of rats. However, the genotoxic effect observed in vitro was confirmed in the in vivo Comet assay in the liver of rats. The Panel concluded that 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal [FL‐no: 16.071] does raise a safety concern with respect to genotoxicity and, therefore, it cannot be evaluated according to the Procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7010128 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70101282020-07-02 Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 226 Revision 1 (FGE.226Rev1): consideration of genotoxicity data on one α,β‐unsaturated aldehyde from chemical subgroup 1.1.1(b) of FGE.19 Silano, Vittorio Bolognesi, Claudia Castle, Laurence Cravedi, Jean‐Pierre Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Franz, Roland Grob, Konrad Husøy, Trine Kärenlampi, Sirpa Mennes, Wim Milana, Maria Rosaria Penninks, André Smith, Andrew Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima Tlustos, Christina Wölfle, Detlef Zorn, Holger Zugravu, Corina‐Aurelia Binderup, Mona‐Lise Crebelli, Riccardo Marcon, Francesca Marzin, Daniel Mosesso, Pasquale Anastassiadou, Maria Carfì, Maria Saarma, Siiri Gürtler, Rainer EFSA J Scientific Opinion The EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids was requested to evaluate the genotoxic potential of one flavouring substance from subgroup 1.1.1(b) of FGE.19 in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 226 (FGE.226). The flavour industry provided genotoxicity studies for the substance 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal [FL‐no: 16.071]. Based on these data, the Panel concluded in FGE.226 that 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal did not induce gene mutations in bacterial cells but was positive in an in vitro micronucleus assay, so, 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal is considered an in vitro genotoxic agent. The negative results obtained in an in vivo micronucleus assay cannot overrule the positive results of the in vitro micronucleus assay with and without S9‐mix due to the lack of demonstration of bone marrow exposure. Following this, the flavour industry has provided plasma analysis of a satellite group of rats treated with 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal in order to investigate the systemic exposure of animals in the in vivo micronucleus assay. However, the plasma analysis did not provide enough evidence of target tissue exposure. An in vivo Comet assay in rodents was recommended in FGE.226, in order to investigate possible genotoxic effects at the first site of contact (e.g. stomach/duodenum cells) and in the liver. An in vivo Comet assay in liver and duodenum was provided that suggests that 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal [FL‐no: 16.071] did not induce DNA damage in the duodenum of rats. However, the genotoxic effect observed in vitro was confirmed in the in vivo Comet assay in the liver of rats. The Panel concluded that 4,5‐epoxydec‐2(trans)‐enal [FL‐no: 16.071] does raise a safety concern with respect to genotoxicity and, therefore, it cannot be evaluated according to the Procedure. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7010128/ /pubmed/32625501 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4847 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Silano, Vittorio Bolognesi, Claudia Castle, Laurence Cravedi, Jean‐Pierre Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Franz, Roland Grob, Konrad Husøy, Trine Kärenlampi, Sirpa Mennes, Wim Milana, Maria Rosaria Penninks, André Smith, Andrew Tavares Poças, Maria de Fátima Tlustos, Christina Wölfle, Detlef Zorn, Holger Zugravu, Corina‐Aurelia Binderup, Mona‐Lise Crebelli, Riccardo Marcon, Francesca Marzin, Daniel Mosesso, Pasquale Anastassiadou, Maria Carfì, Maria Saarma, Siiri Gürtler, Rainer Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 226 Revision 1 (FGE.226Rev1): consideration of genotoxicity data on one α,β‐unsaturated aldehyde from chemical subgroup 1.1.1(b) of FGE.19 |
title | Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 226 Revision 1 (FGE.226Rev1): consideration of genotoxicity data on one α,β‐unsaturated aldehyde from chemical subgroup 1.1.1(b) of FGE.19 |
title_full | Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 226 Revision 1 (FGE.226Rev1): consideration of genotoxicity data on one α,β‐unsaturated aldehyde from chemical subgroup 1.1.1(b) of FGE.19 |
title_fullStr | Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 226 Revision 1 (FGE.226Rev1): consideration of genotoxicity data on one α,β‐unsaturated aldehyde from chemical subgroup 1.1.1(b) of FGE.19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 226 Revision 1 (FGE.226Rev1): consideration of genotoxicity data on one α,β‐unsaturated aldehyde from chemical subgroup 1.1.1(b) of FGE.19 |
title_short | Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 226 Revision 1 (FGE.226Rev1): consideration of genotoxicity data on one α,β‐unsaturated aldehyde from chemical subgroup 1.1.1(b) of FGE.19 |
title_sort | scientific opinion on flavouring group evaluation 226 revision 1 (fge.226rev1): consideration of genotoxicity data on one α,β‐unsaturated aldehyde from chemical subgroup 1.1.1(b) of fge.19 |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625501 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4847 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT silanovittorio scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT bolognesiclaudia scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT castlelaurence scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT cravedijeanpierre scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT engelkarlheinz scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT fowlerpaul scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT franzroland scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT grobkonrad scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT husøytrine scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT karenlampisirpa scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT menneswim scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT milanamariarosaria scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT penninksandre scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT smithandrew scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT tavarespocasmariadefatima scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT tlustoschristina scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT wolfledetlef scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT zornholger scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT zugravucorinaaurelia scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT binderupmonalise scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT crebelliriccardo scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT marconfrancesca scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT marzindaniel scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT mosessopasquale scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT anastassiadoumaria scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT carfimaria scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT saarmasiiri scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 AT gurtlerrainer scientificopiniononflavouringgroupevaluation226revision1fge226rev1considerationofgenotoxicitydataononeabunsaturatedaldehydefromchemicalsubgroup111boffge19 |