Cargando…

Statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse carcinogenicity study on sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute

The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) was requested from the European Commission to provide a statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse study on the carcinogenic potential of sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute (Soffritti et al., 2016)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aguilar, Fernando, Crebelli, Riccardo, Di Domenico, Alessandro, Dusemund, Birgit, Frutos, Maria Jose, Galtier, Pierre, Gott, David, Gundert‐Remy, Ursula, Lambré, Claude, Leblanc, Jean‐Charles, Lindtner, Oliver, Moldeus, Peter, Mosesso, Pasquale, Parent‐Massin, Dominique, Oskarsson, Agneta, Stankovic, Ivan, Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine, Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius, Wright, Matthew, Younes, Maged, Ciccolallo, Laura, Colombo, Paolo, Lodi, Federica, Mortensen, Alicja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625489
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4784
_version_ 1783495822737932288
author Aguilar, Fernando
Crebelli, Riccardo
Di Domenico, Alessandro
Dusemund, Birgit
Frutos, Maria Jose
Galtier, Pierre
Gott, David
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Lambré, Claude
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Lindtner, Oliver
Moldeus, Peter
Mosesso, Pasquale
Parent‐Massin, Dominique
Oskarsson, Agneta
Stankovic, Ivan
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius
Wright, Matthew
Younes, Maged
Ciccolallo, Laura
Colombo, Paolo
Lodi, Federica
Mortensen, Alicja
author_facet Aguilar, Fernando
Crebelli, Riccardo
Di Domenico, Alessandro
Dusemund, Birgit
Frutos, Maria Jose
Galtier, Pierre
Gott, David
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Lambré, Claude
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Lindtner, Oliver
Moldeus, Peter
Mosesso, Pasquale
Parent‐Massin, Dominique
Oskarsson, Agneta
Stankovic, Ivan
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius
Wright, Matthew
Younes, Maged
Ciccolallo, Laura
Colombo, Paolo
Lodi, Federica
Mortensen, Alicja
collection PubMed
description The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) was requested from the European Commission to provide a statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse study on the carcinogenic potential of sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute (Soffritti et al., 2016). Sucralose (E 955) is authorised as a food additive in the EU in accordance with Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 on food additives. According to Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010, the full re‐evaluation of sucralose shall be completed by December 2020. Taking into consideration the publication from Soffritti et al. (2016), the technical report and additional information provided by the Ramazzini Institute and other information available for sucralose (E 955), the Panel noted: (i) the design of the bioassay that considers exposure from gestation up to natural death of animals implies an increase in background pathology that results in the possibility of misclassifications and a difficult interpretation of data, especially in the absence of both an appropriate concurrent control group and a recent historical database; (ii) the lack of a dose–response relationship between the exposure to sucralose and incidence of lymphomas and leukaemias (combined); (iii) the lack of a mode of action and failure to meet all the Bradford‐Hill considerations for a cause–effect relationship between intake of sucralose and the development of tumours in male mice only; (iv) a comprehensive database was available for sucralose and no carcinogenic effect was reported in adequate studies in rats and mice. Moreover, there was no reliable evidence of in vivo genotoxicity. Therefore, the Panel concluded that the available data did not support the conclusions of the authors (Soffritti et al., 2016) that sucralose induced haematopoietic neoplasias in male Swiss mice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7010144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70101442020-07-02 Statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse carcinogenicity study on sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute Aguilar, Fernando Crebelli, Riccardo Di Domenico, Alessandro Dusemund, Birgit Frutos, Maria Jose Galtier, Pierre Gott, David Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Lambré, Claude Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Lindtner, Oliver Moldeus, Peter Mosesso, Pasquale Parent‐Massin, Dominique Oskarsson, Agneta Stankovic, Ivan Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius Wright, Matthew Younes, Maged Ciccolallo, Laura Colombo, Paolo Lodi, Federica Mortensen, Alicja EFSA J Scientific Opinion The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) was requested from the European Commission to provide a statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse study on the carcinogenic potential of sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute (Soffritti et al., 2016). Sucralose (E 955) is authorised as a food additive in the EU in accordance with Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 on food additives. According to Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010, the full re‐evaluation of sucralose shall be completed by December 2020. Taking into consideration the publication from Soffritti et al. (2016), the technical report and additional information provided by the Ramazzini Institute and other information available for sucralose (E 955), the Panel noted: (i) the design of the bioassay that considers exposure from gestation up to natural death of animals implies an increase in background pathology that results in the possibility of misclassifications and a difficult interpretation of data, especially in the absence of both an appropriate concurrent control group and a recent historical database; (ii) the lack of a dose–response relationship between the exposure to sucralose and incidence of lymphomas and leukaemias (combined); (iii) the lack of a mode of action and failure to meet all the Bradford‐Hill considerations for a cause–effect relationship between intake of sucralose and the development of tumours in male mice only; (iv) a comprehensive database was available for sucralose and no carcinogenic effect was reported in adequate studies in rats and mice. Moreover, there was no reliable evidence of in vivo genotoxicity. Therefore, the Panel concluded that the available data did not support the conclusions of the authors (Soffritti et al., 2016) that sucralose induced haematopoietic neoplasias in male Swiss mice. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7010144/ /pubmed/32625489 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4784 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Aguilar, Fernando
Crebelli, Riccardo
Di Domenico, Alessandro
Dusemund, Birgit
Frutos, Maria Jose
Galtier, Pierre
Gott, David
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Lambré, Claude
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Lindtner, Oliver
Moldeus, Peter
Mosesso, Pasquale
Parent‐Massin, Dominique
Oskarsson, Agneta
Stankovic, Ivan
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius
Wright, Matthew
Younes, Maged
Ciccolallo, Laura
Colombo, Paolo
Lodi, Federica
Mortensen, Alicja
Statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse carcinogenicity study on sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute
title Statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse carcinogenicity study on sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute
title_full Statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse carcinogenicity study on sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute
title_fullStr Statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse carcinogenicity study on sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute
title_full_unstemmed Statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse carcinogenicity study on sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute
title_short Statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse carcinogenicity study on sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute
title_sort statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse carcinogenicity study on sucralose (e 955) performed by the ramazzini institute
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625489
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4784
work_keys_str_mv AT statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT aguilarfernando statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT crebelliriccardo statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT didomenicoalessandro statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT dusemundbirgit statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT frutosmariajose statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT galtierpierre statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT gottdavid statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT gundertremyursula statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT lambreclaude statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT leblancjeancharles statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT lindtneroliver statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT moldeuspeter statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT mosessopasquale statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT parentmassindominique statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT oskarssonagneta statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT stankovicivan statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT waalkensberendsenine statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT woutersenrudolfantonius statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT wrightmatthew statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT younesmaged statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT ciccolallolaura statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT colombopaolo statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT lodifederica statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute
AT mortensenalicja statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute