Cargando…
Statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse carcinogenicity study on sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute
The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) was requested from the European Commission to provide a statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse study on the carcinogenic potential of sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute (Soffritti et al., 2016)....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625489 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4784 |
_version_ | 1783495822737932288 |
---|---|
author | Aguilar, Fernando Crebelli, Riccardo Di Domenico, Alessandro Dusemund, Birgit Frutos, Maria Jose Galtier, Pierre Gott, David Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Lambré, Claude Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Lindtner, Oliver Moldeus, Peter Mosesso, Pasquale Parent‐Massin, Dominique Oskarsson, Agneta Stankovic, Ivan Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius Wright, Matthew Younes, Maged Ciccolallo, Laura Colombo, Paolo Lodi, Federica Mortensen, Alicja |
author_facet | Aguilar, Fernando Crebelli, Riccardo Di Domenico, Alessandro Dusemund, Birgit Frutos, Maria Jose Galtier, Pierre Gott, David Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Lambré, Claude Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Lindtner, Oliver Moldeus, Peter Mosesso, Pasquale Parent‐Massin, Dominique Oskarsson, Agneta Stankovic, Ivan Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius Wright, Matthew Younes, Maged Ciccolallo, Laura Colombo, Paolo Lodi, Federica Mortensen, Alicja |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) was requested from the European Commission to provide a statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse study on the carcinogenic potential of sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute (Soffritti et al., 2016). Sucralose (E 955) is authorised as a food additive in the EU in accordance with Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 on food additives. According to Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010, the full re‐evaluation of sucralose shall be completed by December 2020. Taking into consideration the publication from Soffritti et al. (2016), the technical report and additional information provided by the Ramazzini Institute and other information available for sucralose (E 955), the Panel noted: (i) the design of the bioassay that considers exposure from gestation up to natural death of animals implies an increase in background pathology that results in the possibility of misclassifications and a difficult interpretation of data, especially in the absence of both an appropriate concurrent control group and a recent historical database; (ii) the lack of a dose–response relationship between the exposure to sucralose and incidence of lymphomas and leukaemias (combined); (iii) the lack of a mode of action and failure to meet all the Bradford‐Hill considerations for a cause–effect relationship between intake of sucralose and the development of tumours in male mice only; (iv) a comprehensive database was available for sucralose and no carcinogenic effect was reported in adequate studies in rats and mice. Moreover, there was no reliable evidence of in vivo genotoxicity. Therefore, the Panel concluded that the available data did not support the conclusions of the authors (Soffritti et al., 2016) that sucralose induced haematopoietic neoplasias in male Swiss mice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7010144 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70101442020-07-02 Statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse carcinogenicity study on sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute Aguilar, Fernando Crebelli, Riccardo Di Domenico, Alessandro Dusemund, Birgit Frutos, Maria Jose Galtier, Pierre Gott, David Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Lambré, Claude Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Lindtner, Oliver Moldeus, Peter Mosesso, Pasquale Parent‐Massin, Dominique Oskarsson, Agneta Stankovic, Ivan Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius Wright, Matthew Younes, Maged Ciccolallo, Laura Colombo, Paolo Lodi, Federica Mortensen, Alicja EFSA J Scientific Opinion The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) was requested from the European Commission to provide a statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse study on the carcinogenic potential of sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute (Soffritti et al., 2016). Sucralose (E 955) is authorised as a food additive in the EU in accordance with Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 on food additives. According to Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010, the full re‐evaluation of sucralose shall be completed by December 2020. Taking into consideration the publication from Soffritti et al. (2016), the technical report and additional information provided by the Ramazzini Institute and other information available for sucralose (E 955), the Panel noted: (i) the design of the bioassay that considers exposure from gestation up to natural death of animals implies an increase in background pathology that results in the possibility of misclassifications and a difficult interpretation of data, especially in the absence of both an appropriate concurrent control group and a recent historical database; (ii) the lack of a dose–response relationship between the exposure to sucralose and incidence of lymphomas and leukaemias (combined); (iii) the lack of a mode of action and failure to meet all the Bradford‐Hill considerations for a cause–effect relationship between intake of sucralose and the development of tumours in male mice only; (iv) a comprehensive database was available for sucralose and no carcinogenic effect was reported in adequate studies in rats and mice. Moreover, there was no reliable evidence of in vivo genotoxicity. Therefore, the Panel concluded that the available data did not support the conclusions of the authors (Soffritti et al., 2016) that sucralose induced haematopoietic neoplasias in male Swiss mice. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7010144/ /pubmed/32625489 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4784 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Aguilar, Fernando Crebelli, Riccardo Di Domenico, Alessandro Dusemund, Birgit Frutos, Maria Jose Galtier, Pierre Gott, David Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Lambré, Claude Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Lindtner, Oliver Moldeus, Peter Mosesso, Pasquale Parent‐Massin, Dominique Oskarsson, Agneta Stankovic, Ivan Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius Wright, Matthew Younes, Maged Ciccolallo, Laura Colombo, Paolo Lodi, Federica Mortensen, Alicja Statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse carcinogenicity study on sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute |
title | Statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse carcinogenicity study on sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute |
title_full | Statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse carcinogenicity study on sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute |
title_fullStr | Statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse carcinogenicity study on sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute |
title_full_unstemmed | Statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse carcinogenicity study on sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute |
title_short | Statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse carcinogenicity study on sucralose (E 955) performed by the Ramazzini Institute |
title_sort | statement on the validity of the conclusions of a mouse carcinogenicity study on sucralose (e 955) performed by the ramazzini institute |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625489 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4784 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT aguilarfernando statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT crebelliriccardo statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT didomenicoalessandro statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT dusemundbirgit statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT frutosmariajose statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT galtierpierre statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT gottdavid statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT gundertremyursula statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT lambreclaude statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT leblancjeancharles statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT lindtneroliver statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT moldeuspeter statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT mosessopasquale statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT parentmassindominique statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT oskarssonagneta statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT stankovicivan statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT waalkensberendsenine statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT woutersenrudolfantonius statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT wrightmatthew statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT younesmaged statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT ciccolallolaura statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT colombopaolo statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT lodifederica statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute AT mortensenalicja statementonthevalidityoftheconclusionsofamousecarcinogenicitystudyonsucralosee955performedbytheramazziniinstitute |