Cargando…
Re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive
The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (PGPR, E 476) used as a food additive. In 1978, the Scientific Committee for Food (SCF) established an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 7.5 mg/k...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625446 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4743 |
_version_ | 1783495827285606400 |
---|---|
author | Mortensen, Alicja Aguilar, Fernando Crebelli, Riccardo Di Domenico, Alessandro Dusemund, Birgit Frutos, Maria Jose Galtier, Pierre Gott, David Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Lindtner, Oliver Moldeus, Peter Mosesso, Pasquale Parent‐Massin, Dominique Oskarsson, Agneta Stankovic, Ivan Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius Wright, Matthew Younes, Maged Boon, Polly Chrysafidis, Dimitrios Gürtler, Rainer Tobback, Paul Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Lambré, Claude |
author_facet | Mortensen, Alicja Aguilar, Fernando Crebelli, Riccardo Di Domenico, Alessandro Dusemund, Birgit Frutos, Maria Jose Galtier, Pierre Gott, David Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Lindtner, Oliver Moldeus, Peter Mosesso, Pasquale Parent‐Massin, Dominique Oskarsson, Agneta Stankovic, Ivan Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius Wright, Matthew Younes, Maged Boon, Polly Chrysafidis, Dimitrios Gürtler, Rainer Tobback, Paul Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Lambré, Claude |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (PGPR, E 476) used as a food additive. In 1978, the Scientific Committee for Food (SCF) established an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 7.5 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day for PGPR. PGPR is hydrolysed in the gut resulting in the liberation of free polyglycerols, polyricinoleic acid and ricinoleic acid. Di‐ and triglycerol are absorbed and excreted unchanged in the urine; long‐chain polyglycerols show lower absorption and are mainly excreted unchanged in faeces. Acute oral toxicity of PGPR is low, and short‐term and subchronic studies indicate PGPR is tolerated at high doses without adverse effects. PGPR (E 476) is not of concern with regard to genotoxicity or carcinogenicity. The single reproductive toxicity study with PGPR was limited and was not an appropriate study for deriving a health‐based guidance value. Human studies with PGPR demonstrated that there is no indication of significant adverse effect. The Panel considered a 2‐year combined chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study for determining a reference point and derived a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for PGPR (E 476) of 2,500 mg/kg bw per day, the only dose tested. Therefore, the Panel concluded that the present data set give reason to revise the ADI of 7.5 mg/kg bw per day allocated by SCF to 25 mg/kg bw per day. Exposure estimates did not exceed the ADI of 25 mg/kg bw per day and a proposed extension of use would not result in an exposure exceeding this ADI. The Panel recommended modification of the EU specifications for PGPR (E 476). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7010163 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70101632020-07-02 Re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive Mortensen, Alicja Aguilar, Fernando Crebelli, Riccardo Di Domenico, Alessandro Dusemund, Birgit Frutos, Maria Jose Galtier, Pierre Gott, David Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Lindtner, Oliver Moldeus, Peter Mosesso, Pasquale Parent‐Massin, Dominique Oskarsson, Agneta Stankovic, Ivan Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius Wright, Matthew Younes, Maged Boon, Polly Chrysafidis, Dimitrios Gürtler, Rainer Tobback, Paul Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Lambré, Claude EFSA J Scientific Opinion The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion re‐evaluating the safety of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (PGPR, E 476) used as a food additive. In 1978, the Scientific Committee for Food (SCF) established an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 7.5 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day for PGPR. PGPR is hydrolysed in the gut resulting in the liberation of free polyglycerols, polyricinoleic acid and ricinoleic acid. Di‐ and triglycerol are absorbed and excreted unchanged in the urine; long‐chain polyglycerols show lower absorption and are mainly excreted unchanged in faeces. Acute oral toxicity of PGPR is low, and short‐term and subchronic studies indicate PGPR is tolerated at high doses without adverse effects. PGPR (E 476) is not of concern with regard to genotoxicity or carcinogenicity. The single reproductive toxicity study with PGPR was limited and was not an appropriate study for deriving a health‐based guidance value. Human studies with PGPR demonstrated that there is no indication of significant adverse effect. The Panel considered a 2‐year combined chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study for determining a reference point and derived a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for PGPR (E 476) of 2,500 mg/kg bw per day, the only dose tested. Therefore, the Panel concluded that the present data set give reason to revise the ADI of 7.5 mg/kg bw per day allocated by SCF to 25 mg/kg bw per day. Exposure estimates did not exceed the ADI of 25 mg/kg bw per day and a proposed extension of use would not result in an exposure exceeding this ADI. The Panel recommended modification of the EU specifications for PGPR (E 476). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7010163/ /pubmed/32625446 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4743 Text en © 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Mortensen, Alicja Aguilar, Fernando Crebelli, Riccardo Di Domenico, Alessandro Dusemund, Birgit Frutos, Maria Jose Galtier, Pierre Gott, David Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Lindtner, Oliver Moldeus, Peter Mosesso, Pasquale Parent‐Massin, Dominique Oskarsson, Agneta Stankovic, Ivan Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Woutersen, Rudolf Antonius Wright, Matthew Younes, Maged Boon, Polly Chrysafidis, Dimitrios Gürtler, Rainer Tobback, Paul Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Lambré, Claude Re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive |
title | Re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive |
title_full | Re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive |
title_fullStr | Re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive |
title_full_unstemmed | Re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive |
title_short | Re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (E 476) as a food additive |
title_sort | re‐evaluation of polyglycerol polyricinoleate (e 476) as a food additive |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32625446 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4743 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT mortensenalicja reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT aguilarfernando reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT crebelliriccardo reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT didomenicoalessandro reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT dusemundbirgit reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT frutosmariajose reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT galtierpierre reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT gottdavid reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT gundertremyursula reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT leblancjeancharles reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT lindtneroliver reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT moldeuspeter reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT mosessopasquale reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT parentmassindominique reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT oskarssonagneta reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT stankovicivan reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT waalkensberendsenine reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT woutersenrudolfantonius reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT wrightmatthew reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT younesmaged reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT boonpolly reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT chrysafidisdimitrios reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT gurtlerrainer reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT tobbackpaul reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT rinconanamaria reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT tardalexandra reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive AT lambreclaude reevaluationofpolyglycerolpolyricinoleatee476asafoodadditive |