Cargando…
Testing the Use of Static Chamber Boxes to Monitor Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Wood Chip Storage Heaps
This study explores the use of static chamber boxes to detect whether there are fugitive emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) from a willow chip storage heap. The results from the boxes were compared with those from 3-m stainless steel probes inserted into the core of the heap horizontally and verti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32104527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12155-016-9800-9 |
_version_ | 1783495864502714368 |
---|---|
author | Whittaker, Carly Yates, Nicola E. Powers, Stephen J. Donovan, Neil Misselbrook, Tom Shield, Ian |
author_facet | Whittaker, Carly Yates, Nicola E. Powers, Stephen J. Donovan, Neil Misselbrook, Tom Shield, Ian |
author_sort | Whittaker, Carly |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study explores the use of static chamber boxes to detect whether there are fugitive emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) from a willow chip storage heap. The results from the boxes were compared with those from 3-m stainless steel probes inserted into the core of the heap horizontally and vertically at intervals. The results from probes showed that there were increases of carbon dioxide (CO(2)) concentrations in the heap over the first 10 days after heap establishment, which were correlated with a temperature rise to 60 °C. As the CO(2) declined, there was a small peak in methane (CH(4)) concentration in probes orientated vertically in the heap. Static chambers positioned at the apex of the heap detected some CO(2) fluxes as seen in the probes; however, the quantities were small and random in nature. A small (maximum 5 ppm) flux in CH(4) occurred at the same time as the probe concentrations peaked. Overall, the static chamber method was not effective in monitoring fluxes from the heap as there was evidence that gases could enter and leave around the edges of the chambers during the course of the experiment. In general, the use of standard (25 cm high) static chambers for monitoring fluxes from wood chip heaps is not recommended. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12155-016-9800-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7010367 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70103672020-02-24 Testing the Use of Static Chamber Boxes to Monitor Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Wood Chip Storage Heaps Whittaker, Carly Yates, Nicola E. Powers, Stephen J. Donovan, Neil Misselbrook, Tom Shield, Ian Bioenergy Res Article This study explores the use of static chamber boxes to detect whether there are fugitive emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) from a willow chip storage heap. The results from the boxes were compared with those from 3-m stainless steel probes inserted into the core of the heap horizontally and vertically at intervals. The results from probes showed that there were increases of carbon dioxide (CO(2)) concentrations in the heap over the first 10 days after heap establishment, which were correlated with a temperature rise to 60 °C. As the CO(2) declined, there was a small peak in methane (CH(4)) concentration in probes orientated vertically in the heap. Static chambers positioned at the apex of the heap detected some CO(2) fluxes as seen in the probes; however, the quantities were small and random in nature. A small (maximum 5 ppm) flux in CH(4) occurred at the same time as the probe concentrations peaked. Overall, the static chamber method was not effective in monitoring fluxes from the heap as there was evidence that gases could enter and leave around the edges of the chambers during the course of the experiment. In general, the use of standard (25 cm high) static chambers for monitoring fluxes from wood chip heaps is not recommended. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12155-016-9800-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2016-11-09 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC7010367/ /pubmed/32104527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12155-016-9800-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Whittaker, Carly Yates, Nicola E. Powers, Stephen J. Donovan, Neil Misselbrook, Tom Shield, Ian Testing the Use of Static Chamber Boxes to Monitor Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Wood Chip Storage Heaps |
title | Testing the Use of Static Chamber Boxes to Monitor Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Wood Chip Storage Heaps |
title_full | Testing the Use of Static Chamber Boxes to Monitor Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Wood Chip Storage Heaps |
title_fullStr | Testing the Use of Static Chamber Boxes to Monitor Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Wood Chip Storage Heaps |
title_full_unstemmed | Testing the Use of Static Chamber Boxes to Monitor Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Wood Chip Storage Heaps |
title_short | Testing the Use of Static Chamber Boxes to Monitor Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Wood Chip Storage Heaps |
title_sort | testing the use of static chamber boxes to monitor greenhouse gas emissions from wood chip storage heaps |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32104527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12155-016-9800-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whittakercarly testingtheuseofstaticchamberboxestomonitorgreenhousegasemissionsfromwoodchipstorageheaps AT yatesnicolae testingtheuseofstaticchamberboxestomonitorgreenhousegasemissionsfromwoodchipstorageheaps AT powersstephenj testingtheuseofstaticchamberboxestomonitorgreenhousegasemissionsfromwoodchipstorageheaps AT donovanneil testingtheuseofstaticchamberboxestomonitorgreenhousegasemissionsfromwoodchipstorageheaps AT misselbrooktom testingtheuseofstaticchamberboxestomonitorgreenhousegasemissionsfromwoodchipstorageheaps AT shieldian testingtheuseofstaticchamberboxestomonitorgreenhousegasemissionsfromwoodchipstorageheaps |