Cargando…

Test–retest reliability of the Italian version of the M‐BACK questionnaire to assess the barriers, attitudes, confidence, and knowledge of mental health staff regarding metabolic health of psychiatric patients

OBJECTIVES: The Metabolic‐Barriers, Attitudes, Confidence, and Knowledge Questionnaire (M‐BACK) was developed to determine the barriers, attitudes, confidence, and knowledge of mental health practitioners regarding the metabolic health of patients in order to determine the efficacy of targeted train...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carraro, Attilio, Gobbi, Erica, Solmi, Marco, Watkins, Andrew, Ward, Philip B., Rosenbaum, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31875357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1491
_version_ 1783495892320387072
author Carraro, Attilio
Gobbi, Erica
Solmi, Marco
Watkins, Andrew
Ward, Philip B.
Rosenbaum, Simon
author_facet Carraro, Attilio
Gobbi, Erica
Solmi, Marco
Watkins, Andrew
Ward, Philip B.
Rosenbaum, Simon
author_sort Carraro, Attilio
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The Metabolic‐Barriers, Attitudes, Confidence, and Knowledge Questionnaire (M‐BACK) was developed to determine the barriers, attitudes, confidence, and knowledge of mental health practitioners regarding the metabolic health of patients in order to determine the efficacy of targeted training interventions. This study aimed to validate the Italian version of M‐BACK questionnaire (M‐BACK‐IT) and to determine the test–retest reliability. METHODS: The M‐BACK questionnaire was translated into Italian and back‐translated using an established protocol. In order to determine the test–retest reliability of the instrument, mental health professionals were recruited from a private psychiatric hospital located in northeast Italy and completed the questionnaire on two separate occasions, seven days apart. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for the total score, as well as each of the four M‐BACK domains. RESULTS: Thirty mental health professionals (4 psychiatrists, 9 psychologists, 12 nurses, and 5 exercise specialists) completed the M‐BACK‐IT. ICCs ranged from 0.58 to 0.94. CONCLUSIONS: The test–retest reliability of the M‐BACK‐IT demonstrated comparable results to the English version. The M‐BACK‐IT is a reliable measure to assess key elements of practitioners' perceptions of the barriers, their knowledge, attitudes, and confidence regarding metabolic monitoring and intervention in people with mental illness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7010570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70105702020-02-13 Test–retest reliability of the Italian version of the M‐BACK questionnaire to assess the barriers, attitudes, confidence, and knowledge of mental health staff regarding metabolic health of psychiatric patients Carraro, Attilio Gobbi, Erica Solmi, Marco Watkins, Andrew Ward, Philip B. Rosenbaum, Simon Brain Behav Original Research OBJECTIVES: The Metabolic‐Barriers, Attitudes, Confidence, and Knowledge Questionnaire (M‐BACK) was developed to determine the barriers, attitudes, confidence, and knowledge of mental health practitioners regarding the metabolic health of patients in order to determine the efficacy of targeted training interventions. This study aimed to validate the Italian version of M‐BACK questionnaire (M‐BACK‐IT) and to determine the test–retest reliability. METHODS: The M‐BACK questionnaire was translated into Italian and back‐translated using an established protocol. In order to determine the test–retest reliability of the instrument, mental health professionals were recruited from a private psychiatric hospital located in northeast Italy and completed the questionnaire on two separate occasions, seven days apart. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for the total score, as well as each of the four M‐BACK domains. RESULTS: Thirty mental health professionals (4 psychiatrists, 9 psychologists, 12 nurses, and 5 exercise specialists) completed the M‐BACK‐IT. ICCs ranged from 0.58 to 0.94. CONCLUSIONS: The test–retest reliability of the M‐BACK‐IT demonstrated comparable results to the English version. The M‐BACK‐IT is a reliable measure to assess key elements of practitioners' perceptions of the barriers, their knowledge, attitudes, and confidence regarding metabolic monitoring and intervention in people with mental illness. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7010570/ /pubmed/31875357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1491 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Carraro, Attilio
Gobbi, Erica
Solmi, Marco
Watkins, Andrew
Ward, Philip B.
Rosenbaum, Simon
Test–retest reliability of the Italian version of the M‐BACK questionnaire to assess the barriers, attitudes, confidence, and knowledge of mental health staff regarding metabolic health of psychiatric patients
title Test–retest reliability of the Italian version of the M‐BACK questionnaire to assess the barriers, attitudes, confidence, and knowledge of mental health staff regarding metabolic health of psychiatric patients
title_full Test–retest reliability of the Italian version of the M‐BACK questionnaire to assess the barriers, attitudes, confidence, and knowledge of mental health staff regarding metabolic health of psychiatric patients
title_fullStr Test–retest reliability of the Italian version of the M‐BACK questionnaire to assess the barriers, attitudes, confidence, and knowledge of mental health staff regarding metabolic health of psychiatric patients
title_full_unstemmed Test–retest reliability of the Italian version of the M‐BACK questionnaire to assess the barriers, attitudes, confidence, and knowledge of mental health staff regarding metabolic health of psychiatric patients
title_short Test–retest reliability of the Italian version of the M‐BACK questionnaire to assess the barriers, attitudes, confidence, and knowledge of mental health staff regarding metabolic health of psychiatric patients
title_sort test–retest reliability of the italian version of the m‐back questionnaire to assess the barriers, attitudes, confidence, and knowledge of mental health staff regarding metabolic health of psychiatric patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31875357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1491
work_keys_str_mv AT carraroattilio testretestreliabilityoftheitalianversionofthembackquestionnairetoassessthebarriersattitudesconfidenceandknowledgeofmentalhealthstaffregardingmetabolichealthofpsychiatricpatients
AT gobbierica testretestreliabilityoftheitalianversionofthembackquestionnairetoassessthebarriersattitudesconfidenceandknowledgeofmentalhealthstaffregardingmetabolichealthofpsychiatricpatients
AT solmimarco testretestreliabilityoftheitalianversionofthembackquestionnairetoassessthebarriersattitudesconfidenceandknowledgeofmentalhealthstaffregardingmetabolichealthofpsychiatricpatients
AT watkinsandrew testretestreliabilityoftheitalianversionofthembackquestionnairetoassessthebarriersattitudesconfidenceandknowledgeofmentalhealthstaffregardingmetabolichealthofpsychiatricpatients
AT wardphilipb testretestreliabilityoftheitalianversionofthembackquestionnairetoassessthebarriersattitudesconfidenceandknowledgeofmentalhealthstaffregardingmetabolichealthofpsychiatricpatients
AT rosenbaumsimon testretestreliabilityoftheitalianversionofthembackquestionnairetoassessthebarriersattitudesconfidenceandknowledgeofmentalhealthstaffregardingmetabolichealthofpsychiatricpatients