Cargando…

Functional connectivity predicts the dispositional use of expressive suppression but not cognitive reappraisal

INTRODUCTION: Previous research has identified specific brain regions associated with regulating emotion using common strategies such as expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal. However, most research focuses on a priori regions and directs participants how to regulate, which may not reflec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burr, Daisy A., d'Arbeloff, Tracy, Elliott, Maxwell L., Knodt, Annchen R., Brigidi, Bartholomew D., Hariri, Ahmad R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31930667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1493
_version_ 1783495895342383104
author Burr, Daisy A.
d'Arbeloff, Tracy
Elliott, Maxwell L.
Knodt, Annchen R.
Brigidi, Bartholomew D.
Hariri, Ahmad R.
author_facet Burr, Daisy A.
d'Arbeloff, Tracy
Elliott, Maxwell L.
Knodt, Annchen R.
Brigidi, Bartholomew D.
Hariri, Ahmad R.
author_sort Burr, Daisy A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Previous research has identified specific brain regions associated with regulating emotion using common strategies such as expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal. However, most research focuses on a priori regions and directs participants how to regulate, which may not reflect how people naturally regulate outside the laboratory. METHOD: Here, we used a data‐driven approach to investigate how individual differences in distributed intrinsic functional brain connectivity predict emotion regulation tendency outside the laboratory. Specifically, we used connectome‐based predictive modeling to extract functional connections in the brain significantly related to the dispositional use of suppression and reappraisal. These edges were then used in a predictive model and cross‐validated in novel participants to identify a neural signature that reflects individual differences in the tendency to suppress and reappraise emotion. RESULTS: We found a significant neural signature for the dispositional use of suppression, but not reappraisal. Within this whole‐brain signature, the intrinsic connectivity of the default mode network was most informative of suppression tendency. In addition, the predictive performance of this model was significant in males, but not females. CONCLUSION: These findings help inform how whole‐brain networks of functional connectivity characterize how people tend to regulate emotion outside the laboratory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7010583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70105832020-02-13 Functional connectivity predicts the dispositional use of expressive suppression but not cognitive reappraisal Burr, Daisy A. d'Arbeloff, Tracy Elliott, Maxwell L. Knodt, Annchen R. Brigidi, Bartholomew D. Hariri, Ahmad R. Brain Behav Original Research INTRODUCTION: Previous research has identified specific brain regions associated with regulating emotion using common strategies such as expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal. However, most research focuses on a priori regions and directs participants how to regulate, which may not reflect how people naturally regulate outside the laboratory. METHOD: Here, we used a data‐driven approach to investigate how individual differences in distributed intrinsic functional brain connectivity predict emotion regulation tendency outside the laboratory. Specifically, we used connectome‐based predictive modeling to extract functional connections in the brain significantly related to the dispositional use of suppression and reappraisal. These edges were then used in a predictive model and cross‐validated in novel participants to identify a neural signature that reflects individual differences in the tendency to suppress and reappraise emotion. RESULTS: We found a significant neural signature for the dispositional use of suppression, but not reappraisal. Within this whole‐brain signature, the intrinsic connectivity of the default mode network was most informative of suppression tendency. In addition, the predictive performance of this model was significant in males, but not females. CONCLUSION: These findings help inform how whole‐brain networks of functional connectivity characterize how people tend to regulate emotion outside the laboratory. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7010583/ /pubmed/31930667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1493 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Burr, Daisy A.
d'Arbeloff, Tracy
Elliott, Maxwell L.
Knodt, Annchen R.
Brigidi, Bartholomew D.
Hariri, Ahmad R.
Functional connectivity predicts the dispositional use of expressive suppression but not cognitive reappraisal
title Functional connectivity predicts the dispositional use of expressive suppression but not cognitive reappraisal
title_full Functional connectivity predicts the dispositional use of expressive suppression but not cognitive reappraisal
title_fullStr Functional connectivity predicts the dispositional use of expressive suppression but not cognitive reappraisal
title_full_unstemmed Functional connectivity predicts the dispositional use of expressive suppression but not cognitive reappraisal
title_short Functional connectivity predicts the dispositional use of expressive suppression but not cognitive reappraisal
title_sort functional connectivity predicts the dispositional use of expressive suppression but not cognitive reappraisal
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31930667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1493
work_keys_str_mv AT burrdaisya functionalconnectivitypredictsthedispositionaluseofexpressivesuppressionbutnotcognitivereappraisal
AT darbelofftracy functionalconnectivitypredictsthedispositionaluseofexpressivesuppressionbutnotcognitivereappraisal
AT elliottmaxwelll functionalconnectivitypredictsthedispositionaluseofexpressivesuppressionbutnotcognitivereappraisal
AT knodtannchenr functionalconnectivitypredictsthedispositionaluseofexpressivesuppressionbutnotcognitivereappraisal
AT brigidibartholomewd functionalconnectivitypredictsthedispositionaluseofexpressivesuppressionbutnotcognitivereappraisal
AT haririahmadr functionalconnectivitypredictsthedispositionaluseofexpressivesuppressionbutnotcognitivereappraisal