Cargando…
Functional connectivity predicts the dispositional use of expressive suppression but not cognitive reappraisal
INTRODUCTION: Previous research has identified specific brain regions associated with regulating emotion using common strategies such as expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal. However, most research focuses on a priori regions and directs participants how to regulate, which may not reflec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31930667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1493 |
_version_ | 1783495895342383104 |
---|---|
author | Burr, Daisy A. d'Arbeloff, Tracy Elliott, Maxwell L. Knodt, Annchen R. Brigidi, Bartholomew D. Hariri, Ahmad R. |
author_facet | Burr, Daisy A. d'Arbeloff, Tracy Elliott, Maxwell L. Knodt, Annchen R. Brigidi, Bartholomew D. Hariri, Ahmad R. |
author_sort | Burr, Daisy A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Previous research has identified specific brain regions associated with regulating emotion using common strategies such as expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal. However, most research focuses on a priori regions and directs participants how to regulate, which may not reflect how people naturally regulate outside the laboratory. METHOD: Here, we used a data‐driven approach to investigate how individual differences in distributed intrinsic functional brain connectivity predict emotion regulation tendency outside the laboratory. Specifically, we used connectome‐based predictive modeling to extract functional connections in the brain significantly related to the dispositional use of suppression and reappraisal. These edges were then used in a predictive model and cross‐validated in novel participants to identify a neural signature that reflects individual differences in the tendency to suppress and reappraise emotion. RESULTS: We found a significant neural signature for the dispositional use of suppression, but not reappraisal. Within this whole‐brain signature, the intrinsic connectivity of the default mode network was most informative of suppression tendency. In addition, the predictive performance of this model was significant in males, but not females. CONCLUSION: These findings help inform how whole‐brain networks of functional connectivity characterize how people tend to regulate emotion outside the laboratory. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7010583 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70105832020-02-13 Functional connectivity predicts the dispositional use of expressive suppression but not cognitive reappraisal Burr, Daisy A. d'Arbeloff, Tracy Elliott, Maxwell L. Knodt, Annchen R. Brigidi, Bartholomew D. Hariri, Ahmad R. Brain Behav Original Research INTRODUCTION: Previous research has identified specific brain regions associated with regulating emotion using common strategies such as expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal. However, most research focuses on a priori regions and directs participants how to regulate, which may not reflect how people naturally regulate outside the laboratory. METHOD: Here, we used a data‐driven approach to investigate how individual differences in distributed intrinsic functional brain connectivity predict emotion regulation tendency outside the laboratory. Specifically, we used connectome‐based predictive modeling to extract functional connections in the brain significantly related to the dispositional use of suppression and reappraisal. These edges were then used in a predictive model and cross‐validated in novel participants to identify a neural signature that reflects individual differences in the tendency to suppress and reappraise emotion. RESULTS: We found a significant neural signature for the dispositional use of suppression, but not reappraisal. Within this whole‐brain signature, the intrinsic connectivity of the default mode network was most informative of suppression tendency. In addition, the predictive performance of this model was significant in males, but not females. CONCLUSION: These findings help inform how whole‐brain networks of functional connectivity characterize how people tend to regulate emotion outside the laboratory. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7010583/ /pubmed/31930667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1493 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Burr, Daisy A. d'Arbeloff, Tracy Elliott, Maxwell L. Knodt, Annchen R. Brigidi, Bartholomew D. Hariri, Ahmad R. Functional connectivity predicts the dispositional use of expressive suppression but not cognitive reappraisal |
title | Functional connectivity predicts the dispositional use of expressive suppression but not cognitive reappraisal |
title_full | Functional connectivity predicts the dispositional use of expressive suppression but not cognitive reappraisal |
title_fullStr | Functional connectivity predicts the dispositional use of expressive suppression but not cognitive reappraisal |
title_full_unstemmed | Functional connectivity predicts the dispositional use of expressive suppression but not cognitive reappraisal |
title_short | Functional connectivity predicts the dispositional use of expressive suppression but not cognitive reappraisal |
title_sort | functional connectivity predicts the dispositional use of expressive suppression but not cognitive reappraisal |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31930667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1493 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burrdaisya functionalconnectivitypredictsthedispositionaluseofexpressivesuppressionbutnotcognitivereappraisal AT darbelofftracy functionalconnectivitypredictsthedispositionaluseofexpressivesuppressionbutnotcognitivereappraisal AT elliottmaxwelll functionalconnectivitypredictsthedispositionaluseofexpressivesuppressionbutnotcognitivereappraisal AT knodtannchenr functionalconnectivitypredictsthedispositionaluseofexpressivesuppressionbutnotcognitivereappraisal AT brigidibartholomewd functionalconnectivitypredictsthedispositionaluseofexpressivesuppressionbutnotcognitivereappraisal AT haririahmadr functionalconnectivitypredictsthedispositionaluseofexpressivesuppressionbutnotcognitivereappraisal |