Cargando…
Field performance of a low-cost sensor in the monitoring of particulate matter in Santiago, Chile
Integration of low-cost air quality sensors with the internet of things (IoT) has become a feasible approach towards the development of smart cities. Several studies have assessed the performance of low-cost air quality sensors by comparing their measurements with reference instruments. We examined...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32040639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8118-4 |
_version_ | 1783495904600260608 |
---|---|
author | Tagle, Matías Rojas, Francisca Reyes, Felipe Vásquez, Yeanice Hallgren, Fredrik Lindén, Jenny Kolev, Dimitar Watne, Ågot K. Oyola, Pedro |
author_facet | Tagle, Matías Rojas, Francisca Reyes, Felipe Vásquez, Yeanice Hallgren, Fredrik Lindén, Jenny Kolev, Dimitar Watne, Ågot K. Oyola, Pedro |
author_sort | Tagle, Matías |
collection | PubMed |
description | Integration of low-cost air quality sensors with the internet of things (IoT) has become a feasible approach towards the development of smart cities. Several studies have assessed the performance of low-cost air quality sensors by comparing their measurements with reference instruments. We examined the performance of a low-cost IoT particulate matter (PM(10) and PM(2.5)) sensor in the urban environment of Santiago, Chile. The prototype was assembled from a PM(10)–PM(2.5) sensor (SDS011), a temperature and relative humidity sensor (BME280) and an IoT board (ESP8266/Node MCU). Field tests were conducted at three regulatory monitoring stations during the 2018 austral winter and spring seasons. The sensors at each site were operated in parallel with continuous reference air quality monitors (BAM 1020 and TEOM 1400) and a filter-based sampler (Partisol 2000i). Variability between sensor units (n = 7) and the correlation between the sensor and reference instruments were examined. Moderate inter-unit variability was observed between sensors for PM(2.5) (normalized root-mean-square error 9–24%) and PM(10) (10–37%). The correlations between the 1-h average concentrations reported by the sensors and continuous monitors were higher for PM(2.5) (R(2) 0.47–0.86) than PM(10) (0.24–0.56). The correlations (R(2)) between the 24-h PM(2.5) averages from the sensors and reference instruments were 0.63–0.87 for continuous monitoring and 0.69–0.93 for filter-based samplers. Correlation analysis revealed that sensors tended to overestimate PM concentrations in high relative humidity (RH > 75%) and underestimate when RH was below 50%. Overall, the prototype evaluated exhibited adequate performance and may be potentially suitable for monitoring daily PM(2.5) averages after correcting for RH. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10661-020-8118-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7010625 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70106252020-02-24 Field performance of a low-cost sensor in the monitoring of particulate matter in Santiago, Chile Tagle, Matías Rojas, Francisca Reyes, Felipe Vásquez, Yeanice Hallgren, Fredrik Lindén, Jenny Kolev, Dimitar Watne, Ågot K. Oyola, Pedro Environ Monit Assess Article Integration of low-cost air quality sensors with the internet of things (IoT) has become a feasible approach towards the development of smart cities. Several studies have assessed the performance of low-cost air quality sensors by comparing their measurements with reference instruments. We examined the performance of a low-cost IoT particulate matter (PM(10) and PM(2.5)) sensor in the urban environment of Santiago, Chile. The prototype was assembled from a PM(10)–PM(2.5) sensor (SDS011), a temperature and relative humidity sensor (BME280) and an IoT board (ESP8266/Node MCU). Field tests were conducted at three regulatory monitoring stations during the 2018 austral winter and spring seasons. The sensors at each site were operated in parallel with continuous reference air quality monitors (BAM 1020 and TEOM 1400) and a filter-based sampler (Partisol 2000i). Variability between sensor units (n = 7) and the correlation between the sensor and reference instruments were examined. Moderate inter-unit variability was observed between sensors for PM(2.5) (normalized root-mean-square error 9–24%) and PM(10) (10–37%). The correlations between the 1-h average concentrations reported by the sensors and continuous monitors were higher for PM(2.5) (R(2) 0.47–0.86) than PM(10) (0.24–0.56). The correlations (R(2)) between the 24-h PM(2.5) averages from the sensors and reference instruments were 0.63–0.87 for continuous monitoring and 0.69–0.93 for filter-based samplers. Correlation analysis revealed that sensors tended to overestimate PM concentrations in high relative humidity (RH > 75%) and underestimate when RH was below 50%. Overall, the prototype evaluated exhibited adequate performance and may be potentially suitable for monitoring daily PM(2.5) averages after correcting for RH. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10661-020-8118-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-02-10 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7010625/ /pubmed/32040639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8118-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Tagle, Matías Rojas, Francisca Reyes, Felipe Vásquez, Yeanice Hallgren, Fredrik Lindén, Jenny Kolev, Dimitar Watne, Ågot K. Oyola, Pedro Field performance of a low-cost sensor in the monitoring of particulate matter in Santiago, Chile |
title | Field performance of a low-cost sensor in the monitoring of particulate matter in Santiago, Chile |
title_full | Field performance of a low-cost sensor in the monitoring of particulate matter in Santiago, Chile |
title_fullStr | Field performance of a low-cost sensor in the monitoring of particulate matter in Santiago, Chile |
title_full_unstemmed | Field performance of a low-cost sensor in the monitoring of particulate matter in Santiago, Chile |
title_short | Field performance of a low-cost sensor in the monitoring of particulate matter in Santiago, Chile |
title_sort | field performance of a low-cost sensor in the monitoring of particulate matter in santiago, chile |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32040639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8118-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taglematias fieldperformanceofalowcostsensorinthemonitoringofparticulatematterinsantiagochile AT rojasfrancisca fieldperformanceofalowcostsensorinthemonitoringofparticulatematterinsantiagochile AT reyesfelipe fieldperformanceofalowcostsensorinthemonitoringofparticulatematterinsantiagochile AT vasquezyeanice fieldperformanceofalowcostsensorinthemonitoringofparticulatematterinsantiagochile AT hallgrenfredrik fieldperformanceofalowcostsensorinthemonitoringofparticulatematterinsantiagochile AT lindenjenny fieldperformanceofalowcostsensorinthemonitoringofparticulatematterinsantiagochile AT kolevdimitar fieldperformanceofalowcostsensorinthemonitoringofparticulatematterinsantiagochile AT watneagotk fieldperformanceofalowcostsensorinthemonitoringofparticulatematterinsantiagochile AT oyolapedro fieldperformanceofalowcostsensorinthemonitoringofparticulatematterinsantiagochile |