Cargando…
Differences in Transcriptional Dynamics Between T-cells and Macrophages as Determined by a Three-State Mathematical Model
HIV-1 viral transcription persists in patients despite antiretroviral treatment, potentially due to intermittent HIV-1 LTR activation. While several mathematical models have been explored in the context of LTR-protein interactions, in this work for the first time HIV-1 LTR model featuring repressed,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32042107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59008-0 |
_version_ | 1783495913929441280 |
---|---|
author | DeMarino, Catherine Cowen, Maria Pleet, Michelle L. Pinto, Daniel O. Khatkar, Pooja Erickson, James Docken, Steffen S. Russell, Nicholas Reichmuth, Blake Phan, Tin Kuang, Yang Anderson, Daniel M. Emelianenko, Maria Kashanchi, Fatah |
author_facet | DeMarino, Catherine Cowen, Maria Pleet, Michelle L. Pinto, Daniel O. Khatkar, Pooja Erickson, James Docken, Steffen S. Russell, Nicholas Reichmuth, Blake Phan, Tin Kuang, Yang Anderson, Daniel M. Emelianenko, Maria Kashanchi, Fatah |
author_sort | DeMarino, Catherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | HIV-1 viral transcription persists in patients despite antiretroviral treatment, potentially due to intermittent HIV-1 LTR activation. While several mathematical models have been explored in the context of LTR-protein interactions, in this work for the first time HIV-1 LTR model featuring repressed, intermediate, and activated LTR states is integrated with generation of long (env) and short (TAR) RNAs and proteins (Tat, Pr55, and p24) in T-cells and macrophages using both cell lines and infected primary cells. This type of extended modeling framework allows us to compare and contrast behavior of these two cell types. We demonstrate that they exhibit unique LTR dynamics, which ultimately results in differences in the magnitude of viral products generated. One of the distinctive features of this work is that it relies on experimental data in reaction rate computations. Two RNA transcription rates from the activated promoter states are fit by comparison of experimental data to model predictions. Fitting to the data also provides estimates for the degradation/exit rates for long and short viral RNA. Our experimentally generated data is in reasonable agreement for the T-cell as well macrophage population and gives strong evidence in support of using the proposed integrated modeling paradigm. Sensitivity analysis performed using Latin hypercube sampling method confirms robustness of the model with respect to small parameter perturbations. Finally, incorporation of a transcription inhibitor (F07#13) into the governing equations demonstrates how the model can be used to assess drug efficacy. Collectively, our model indicates transcriptional differences between latently HIV-1 infected T-cells and macrophages and provides a novel platform to study various transcriptional dynamics leading to latency or activation in numerous cell types and physiological conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7010665 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70106652020-02-21 Differences in Transcriptional Dynamics Between T-cells and Macrophages as Determined by a Three-State Mathematical Model DeMarino, Catherine Cowen, Maria Pleet, Michelle L. Pinto, Daniel O. Khatkar, Pooja Erickson, James Docken, Steffen S. Russell, Nicholas Reichmuth, Blake Phan, Tin Kuang, Yang Anderson, Daniel M. Emelianenko, Maria Kashanchi, Fatah Sci Rep Article HIV-1 viral transcription persists in patients despite antiretroviral treatment, potentially due to intermittent HIV-1 LTR activation. While several mathematical models have been explored in the context of LTR-protein interactions, in this work for the first time HIV-1 LTR model featuring repressed, intermediate, and activated LTR states is integrated with generation of long (env) and short (TAR) RNAs and proteins (Tat, Pr55, and p24) in T-cells and macrophages using both cell lines and infected primary cells. This type of extended modeling framework allows us to compare and contrast behavior of these two cell types. We demonstrate that they exhibit unique LTR dynamics, which ultimately results in differences in the magnitude of viral products generated. One of the distinctive features of this work is that it relies on experimental data in reaction rate computations. Two RNA transcription rates from the activated promoter states are fit by comparison of experimental data to model predictions. Fitting to the data also provides estimates for the degradation/exit rates for long and short viral RNA. Our experimentally generated data is in reasonable agreement for the T-cell as well macrophage population and gives strong evidence in support of using the proposed integrated modeling paradigm. Sensitivity analysis performed using Latin hypercube sampling method confirms robustness of the model with respect to small parameter perturbations. Finally, incorporation of a transcription inhibitor (F07#13) into the governing equations demonstrates how the model can be used to assess drug efficacy. Collectively, our model indicates transcriptional differences between latently HIV-1 infected T-cells and macrophages and provides a novel platform to study various transcriptional dynamics leading to latency or activation in numerous cell types and physiological conditions. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7010665/ /pubmed/32042107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59008-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article DeMarino, Catherine Cowen, Maria Pleet, Michelle L. Pinto, Daniel O. Khatkar, Pooja Erickson, James Docken, Steffen S. Russell, Nicholas Reichmuth, Blake Phan, Tin Kuang, Yang Anderson, Daniel M. Emelianenko, Maria Kashanchi, Fatah Differences in Transcriptional Dynamics Between T-cells and Macrophages as Determined by a Three-State Mathematical Model |
title | Differences in Transcriptional Dynamics Between T-cells and Macrophages as Determined by a Three-State Mathematical Model |
title_full | Differences in Transcriptional Dynamics Between T-cells and Macrophages as Determined by a Three-State Mathematical Model |
title_fullStr | Differences in Transcriptional Dynamics Between T-cells and Macrophages as Determined by a Three-State Mathematical Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in Transcriptional Dynamics Between T-cells and Macrophages as Determined by a Three-State Mathematical Model |
title_short | Differences in Transcriptional Dynamics Between T-cells and Macrophages as Determined by a Three-State Mathematical Model |
title_sort | differences in transcriptional dynamics between t-cells and macrophages as determined by a three-state mathematical model |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32042107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59008-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demarinocatherine differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel AT cowenmaria differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel AT pleetmichellel differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel AT pintodanielo differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel AT khatkarpooja differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel AT ericksonjames differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel AT dockensteffens differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel AT russellnicholas differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel AT reichmuthblake differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel AT phantin differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel AT kuangyang differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel AT andersondanielm differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel AT emelianenkomaria differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel AT kashanchifatah differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel |