Cargando…

Differences in Transcriptional Dynamics Between T-cells and Macrophages as Determined by a Three-State Mathematical Model

HIV-1 viral transcription persists in patients despite antiretroviral treatment, potentially due to intermittent HIV-1 LTR activation. While several mathematical models have been explored in the context of LTR-protein interactions, in this work for the first time HIV-1 LTR model featuring repressed,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DeMarino, Catherine, Cowen, Maria, Pleet, Michelle L., Pinto, Daniel O., Khatkar, Pooja, Erickson, James, Docken, Steffen S., Russell, Nicholas, Reichmuth, Blake, Phan, Tin, Kuang, Yang, Anderson, Daniel M., Emelianenko, Maria, Kashanchi, Fatah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32042107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59008-0
_version_ 1783495913929441280
author DeMarino, Catherine
Cowen, Maria
Pleet, Michelle L.
Pinto, Daniel O.
Khatkar, Pooja
Erickson, James
Docken, Steffen S.
Russell, Nicholas
Reichmuth, Blake
Phan, Tin
Kuang, Yang
Anderson, Daniel M.
Emelianenko, Maria
Kashanchi, Fatah
author_facet DeMarino, Catherine
Cowen, Maria
Pleet, Michelle L.
Pinto, Daniel O.
Khatkar, Pooja
Erickson, James
Docken, Steffen S.
Russell, Nicholas
Reichmuth, Blake
Phan, Tin
Kuang, Yang
Anderson, Daniel M.
Emelianenko, Maria
Kashanchi, Fatah
author_sort DeMarino, Catherine
collection PubMed
description HIV-1 viral transcription persists in patients despite antiretroviral treatment, potentially due to intermittent HIV-1 LTR activation. While several mathematical models have been explored in the context of LTR-protein interactions, in this work for the first time HIV-1 LTR model featuring repressed, intermediate, and activated LTR states is integrated with generation of long (env) and short (TAR) RNAs and proteins (Tat, Pr55, and p24) in T-cells and macrophages using both cell lines and infected primary cells. This type of extended modeling framework allows us to compare and contrast behavior of these two cell types. We demonstrate that they exhibit unique LTR dynamics, which ultimately results in differences in the magnitude of viral products generated. One of the distinctive features of this work is that it relies on experimental data in reaction rate computations. Two RNA transcription rates from the activated promoter states are fit by comparison of experimental data to model predictions. Fitting to the data also provides estimates for the degradation/exit rates for long and short viral RNA. Our experimentally generated data is in reasonable agreement for the T-cell as well macrophage population and gives strong evidence in support of using the proposed integrated modeling paradigm. Sensitivity analysis performed using Latin hypercube sampling method confirms robustness of the model with respect to small parameter perturbations. Finally, incorporation of a transcription inhibitor (F07#13) into the governing equations demonstrates how the model can be used to assess drug efficacy. Collectively, our model indicates transcriptional differences between latently HIV-1 infected T-cells and macrophages and provides a novel platform to study various transcriptional dynamics leading to latency or activation in numerous cell types and physiological conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7010665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70106652020-02-21 Differences in Transcriptional Dynamics Between T-cells and Macrophages as Determined by a Three-State Mathematical Model DeMarino, Catherine Cowen, Maria Pleet, Michelle L. Pinto, Daniel O. Khatkar, Pooja Erickson, James Docken, Steffen S. Russell, Nicholas Reichmuth, Blake Phan, Tin Kuang, Yang Anderson, Daniel M. Emelianenko, Maria Kashanchi, Fatah Sci Rep Article HIV-1 viral transcription persists in patients despite antiretroviral treatment, potentially due to intermittent HIV-1 LTR activation. While several mathematical models have been explored in the context of LTR-protein interactions, in this work for the first time HIV-1 LTR model featuring repressed, intermediate, and activated LTR states is integrated with generation of long (env) and short (TAR) RNAs and proteins (Tat, Pr55, and p24) in T-cells and macrophages using both cell lines and infected primary cells. This type of extended modeling framework allows us to compare and contrast behavior of these two cell types. We demonstrate that they exhibit unique LTR dynamics, which ultimately results in differences in the magnitude of viral products generated. One of the distinctive features of this work is that it relies on experimental data in reaction rate computations. Two RNA transcription rates from the activated promoter states are fit by comparison of experimental data to model predictions. Fitting to the data also provides estimates for the degradation/exit rates for long and short viral RNA. Our experimentally generated data is in reasonable agreement for the T-cell as well macrophage population and gives strong evidence in support of using the proposed integrated modeling paradigm. Sensitivity analysis performed using Latin hypercube sampling method confirms robustness of the model with respect to small parameter perturbations. Finally, incorporation of a transcription inhibitor (F07#13) into the governing equations demonstrates how the model can be used to assess drug efficacy. Collectively, our model indicates transcriptional differences between latently HIV-1 infected T-cells and macrophages and provides a novel platform to study various transcriptional dynamics leading to latency or activation in numerous cell types and physiological conditions. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7010665/ /pubmed/32042107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59008-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
DeMarino, Catherine
Cowen, Maria
Pleet, Michelle L.
Pinto, Daniel O.
Khatkar, Pooja
Erickson, James
Docken, Steffen S.
Russell, Nicholas
Reichmuth, Blake
Phan, Tin
Kuang, Yang
Anderson, Daniel M.
Emelianenko, Maria
Kashanchi, Fatah
Differences in Transcriptional Dynamics Between T-cells and Macrophages as Determined by a Three-State Mathematical Model
title Differences in Transcriptional Dynamics Between T-cells and Macrophages as Determined by a Three-State Mathematical Model
title_full Differences in Transcriptional Dynamics Between T-cells and Macrophages as Determined by a Three-State Mathematical Model
title_fullStr Differences in Transcriptional Dynamics Between T-cells and Macrophages as Determined by a Three-State Mathematical Model
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Transcriptional Dynamics Between T-cells and Macrophages as Determined by a Three-State Mathematical Model
title_short Differences in Transcriptional Dynamics Between T-cells and Macrophages as Determined by a Three-State Mathematical Model
title_sort differences in transcriptional dynamics between t-cells and macrophages as determined by a three-state mathematical model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32042107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59008-0
work_keys_str_mv AT demarinocatherine differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel
AT cowenmaria differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel
AT pleetmichellel differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel
AT pintodanielo differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel
AT khatkarpooja differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel
AT ericksonjames differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel
AT dockensteffens differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel
AT russellnicholas differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel
AT reichmuthblake differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel
AT phantin differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel
AT kuangyang differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel
AT andersondanielm differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel
AT emelianenkomaria differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel
AT kashanchifatah differencesintranscriptionaldynamicsbetweentcellsandmacrophagesasdeterminedbyathreestatemathematicalmodel