Cargando…
Machine Learning and Initial Nursing Assessment-Based Triage System for Emergency Department
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop machine learning (ML) and initial nursing assessment (INA)-based emergency department (ED) triage to predict adverse clinical outcome. METHODS: The retrospective study included ED visits between January 2016 and December 2017 that resulted in either i...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Medical Informatics
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32082696 http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2020.26.1.13 |
_version_ | 1783495971568615424 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Jae Yong Jeong, Gab Yong Jeong, Ok Soon Chang, Dong Kyung Cha, Won Chul |
author_facet | Yu, Jae Yong Jeong, Gab Yong Jeong, Ok Soon Chang, Dong Kyung Cha, Won Chul |
author_sort | Yu, Jae Yong |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop machine learning (ML) and initial nursing assessment (INA)-based emergency department (ED) triage to predict adverse clinical outcome. METHODS: The retrospective study included ED visits between January 2016 and December 2017 that resulted in either intensive care unit admission or emergency room death. We trained four classifiers using logistic regression and a deep learning model on INA and low dimensional (LD) INA, logistic regression on the Korea Triage and acuity scale (KTAS) and Sequential Related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA). We varied the outcome ratio for external validation. Finally, variables of importance were identified using the random forest model's information gain. The four most influential variables were used for LD modeling for efficiency. RESULTS: A total of 86,304 patient visits were included, with an overall outcome rate of 3.5%. The area under the curve (AUC) values for the KTAS model were 76.8 (74.9–78.6) with logistic regression and 74.0 (72.1–75.9) for the SOFA model, while the AUC values of the INA model were 87.2 (85.9–88.6) and 87.6 (86.3–88.9) with logistic regression and deep learning, suggesting that the ML and INA-based triage system result more accurately predicted the outcomes. The AUC values for the LD model were 81.2 (79.4–82.9) and 80.7 (78.9–82.5) for logistic regression and deep learning, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an ML and INA-based triage system for EDs. The novel system was able to predict clinical outcomes more accurately than existing triage systems, KTAS and SOFA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7010940 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Korean Society of Medical Informatics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70109402020-02-20 Machine Learning and Initial Nursing Assessment-Based Triage System for Emergency Department Yu, Jae Yong Jeong, Gab Yong Jeong, Ok Soon Chang, Dong Kyung Cha, Won Chul Healthc Inform Res Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop machine learning (ML) and initial nursing assessment (INA)-based emergency department (ED) triage to predict adverse clinical outcome. METHODS: The retrospective study included ED visits between January 2016 and December 2017 that resulted in either intensive care unit admission or emergency room death. We trained four classifiers using logistic regression and a deep learning model on INA and low dimensional (LD) INA, logistic regression on the Korea Triage and acuity scale (KTAS) and Sequential Related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA). We varied the outcome ratio for external validation. Finally, variables of importance were identified using the random forest model's information gain. The four most influential variables were used for LD modeling for efficiency. RESULTS: A total of 86,304 patient visits were included, with an overall outcome rate of 3.5%. The area under the curve (AUC) values for the KTAS model were 76.8 (74.9–78.6) with logistic regression and 74.0 (72.1–75.9) for the SOFA model, while the AUC values of the INA model were 87.2 (85.9–88.6) and 87.6 (86.3–88.9) with logistic regression and deep learning, suggesting that the ML and INA-based triage system result more accurately predicted the outcomes. The AUC values for the LD model were 81.2 (79.4–82.9) and 80.7 (78.9–82.5) for logistic regression and deep learning, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an ML and INA-based triage system for EDs. The novel system was able to predict clinical outcomes more accurately than existing triage systems, KTAS and SOFA. Korean Society of Medical Informatics 2020-01 2020-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7010940/ /pubmed/32082696 http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2020.26.1.13 Text en © 2020 The Korean Society of Medical Informatics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yu, Jae Yong Jeong, Gab Yong Jeong, Ok Soon Chang, Dong Kyung Cha, Won Chul Machine Learning and Initial Nursing Assessment-Based Triage System for Emergency Department |
title | Machine Learning and Initial Nursing Assessment-Based Triage System for Emergency Department |
title_full | Machine Learning and Initial Nursing Assessment-Based Triage System for Emergency Department |
title_fullStr | Machine Learning and Initial Nursing Assessment-Based Triage System for Emergency Department |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine Learning and Initial Nursing Assessment-Based Triage System for Emergency Department |
title_short | Machine Learning and Initial Nursing Assessment-Based Triage System for Emergency Department |
title_sort | machine learning and initial nursing assessment-based triage system for emergency department |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32082696 http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2020.26.1.13 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yujaeyong machinelearningandinitialnursingassessmentbasedtriagesystemforemergencydepartment AT jeonggabyong machinelearningandinitialnursingassessmentbasedtriagesystemforemergencydepartment AT jeongoksoon machinelearningandinitialnursingassessmentbasedtriagesystemforemergencydepartment AT changdongkyung machinelearningandinitialnursingassessmentbasedtriagesystemforemergencydepartment AT chawonchul machinelearningandinitialnursingassessmentbasedtriagesystemforemergencydepartment |