Cargando…

Assessment of fitness for recreational scuba diving in candidates with asthma: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Asthma may be regarded as a contraindication to scuba diving. PURPOSE: A clinical algorithm to assess fitness to dive among individuals with asthma was developed and tested prospectively in clinical practice. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. METHODS: All patients with possible asthma referred...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ustrup, Amalie, Pedersen, Signe Knag, Suppli Ulrik, Charlotte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000624
_version_ 1783495981120094208
author Ustrup, Amalie
Pedersen, Signe Knag
Suppli Ulrik, Charlotte
author_facet Ustrup, Amalie
Pedersen, Signe Knag
Suppli Ulrik, Charlotte
author_sort Ustrup, Amalie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Asthma may be regarded as a contraindication to scuba diving. PURPOSE: A clinical algorithm to assess fitness to dive among individuals with asthma was developed and tested prospectively in clinical practice. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. METHODS: All patients with possible asthma referred to Hvidovre Hospital, Denmark, for assessment of fitness to dive over a 5-year period (2013–2017) were included. Fitness to dive was assessed by case history, spirometry and mannitol challenge test. All patients with ≥10% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) (at any point during the challenge test) were offered step-up asthma therapy and rechallenge after at least 3 months. Patients with <10% decline in FEV(1) after administration of a maximum dose of mannitol at the latest challenge were classified as having no medical contraindications to scuba diving. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 41 patients (24 men; mean age 33 years), of whom 71% and 63% of men and women, respectively, were treated with rescue bronchodilator and inhaled corticosteroid. After the first mannitol challenge test, 21 patients were classified as having no medical contraindications to scuba diving, of whom 16 were currently prescribed asthma medication. After step-up asthma therapy and rechallenge test, an additional seven patients were classified as having no medical contraindications to scuba diving. Overall, using this clinical algorithm, 28 (68%) of the referred patients were finally assessed as having no medical contraindications to scuba diving. CONCLUSION: Using a clinical algorithm with mannitol challenge to assess fitness to dive among patients with possible asthma and allowing a rechallenge test after step-up asthma therapy increased the proportion of individuals classified as having no medical contraindications to scuba diving. However, as this algorithm has so far not been evaluated against actual scuba diving safety, further studies are clearly needed before it can be implemented with confidence for use in clinical practice. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An algorithm to assess fitness for scuba diving among individuals with possible asthma using bronchial challenge test, with the option of step-up asthma therapy and rechallenge for reassessment, has been developed for clinical use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7010986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70109862020-02-24 Assessment of fitness for recreational scuba diving in candidates with asthma: a pilot study Ustrup, Amalie Pedersen, Signe Knag Suppli Ulrik, Charlotte BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Asthma may be regarded as a contraindication to scuba diving. PURPOSE: A clinical algorithm to assess fitness to dive among individuals with asthma was developed and tested prospectively in clinical practice. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. METHODS: All patients with possible asthma referred to Hvidovre Hospital, Denmark, for assessment of fitness to dive over a 5-year period (2013–2017) were included. Fitness to dive was assessed by case history, spirometry and mannitol challenge test. All patients with ≥10% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) (at any point during the challenge test) were offered step-up asthma therapy and rechallenge after at least 3 months. Patients with <10% decline in FEV(1) after administration of a maximum dose of mannitol at the latest challenge were classified as having no medical contraindications to scuba diving. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 41 patients (24 men; mean age 33 years), of whom 71% and 63% of men and women, respectively, were treated with rescue bronchodilator and inhaled corticosteroid. After the first mannitol challenge test, 21 patients were classified as having no medical contraindications to scuba diving, of whom 16 were currently prescribed asthma medication. After step-up asthma therapy and rechallenge test, an additional seven patients were classified as having no medical contraindications to scuba diving. Overall, using this clinical algorithm, 28 (68%) of the referred patients were finally assessed as having no medical contraindications to scuba diving. CONCLUSION: Using a clinical algorithm with mannitol challenge to assess fitness to dive among patients with possible asthma and allowing a rechallenge test after step-up asthma therapy increased the proportion of individuals classified as having no medical contraindications to scuba diving. However, as this algorithm has so far not been evaluated against actual scuba diving safety, further studies are clearly needed before it can be implemented with confidence for use in clinical practice. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An algorithm to assess fitness for scuba diving among individuals with possible asthma using bronchial challenge test, with the option of step-up asthma therapy and rechallenge for reassessment, has been developed for clinical use. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7010986/ /pubmed/32095266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000624 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ustrup, Amalie
Pedersen, Signe Knag
Suppli Ulrik, Charlotte
Assessment of fitness for recreational scuba diving in candidates with asthma: a pilot study
title Assessment of fitness for recreational scuba diving in candidates with asthma: a pilot study
title_full Assessment of fitness for recreational scuba diving in candidates with asthma: a pilot study
title_fullStr Assessment of fitness for recreational scuba diving in candidates with asthma: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of fitness for recreational scuba diving in candidates with asthma: a pilot study
title_short Assessment of fitness for recreational scuba diving in candidates with asthma: a pilot study
title_sort assessment of fitness for recreational scuba diving in candidates with asthma: a pilot study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7010986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000624
work_keys_str_mv AT ustrupamalie assessmentoffitnessforrecreationalscubadivingincandidateswithasthmaapilotstudy
AT pedersensigneknag assessmentoffitnessforrecreationalscubadivingincandidateswithasthmaapilotstudy
AT suppliulrikcharlotte assessmentoffitnessforrecreationalscubadivingincandidateswithasthmaapilotstudy