Cargando…
Prospective Evaluation of HIV Testing Technologies in a Clinical Setting: Protocol for Project DETECT
BACKGROUND: HIV testing guidelines provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are continually changing to reflect advancements in new testing technology. Evaluation of existing and new point-of-care (POC) HIV tests is crucial to inform testing guidelines and provide information...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7011122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32012115 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16332 |
_version_ | 1783496009677012992 |
---|---|
author | Stekler, Joanne D Violette, Lauren R Clark, Hollie A McDougal, Sarah J Niemann, Lisa A Katz, David A Chavez, Pollyanna R Wesolowski, Laura G Ethridge, Steven F McMahan, Vanessa M Cornelius-Hudson, Andy Delaney, Kevin P |
author_facet | Stekler, Joanne D Violette, Lauren R Clark, Hollie A McDougal, Sarah J Niemann, Lisa A Katz, David A Chavez, Pollyanna R Wesolowski, Laura G Ethridge, Steven F McMahan, Vanessa M Cornelius-Hudson, Andy Delaney, Kevin P |
author_sort | Stekler, Joanne D |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: HIV testing guidelines provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are continually changing to reflect advancements in new testing technology. Evaluation of existing and new point-of-care (POC) HIV tests is crucial to inform testing guidelines and provide information to clinicians and other HIV test providers. Characterizing the performance of POC HIV tests using unprocessed specimens can provide estimates for the window period of detection, or the time from HIV acquisition to test positivity, which allows clinicians and other HIV providers to select the appropriate POC HIV tests for persons who may be recently infected with HIV. OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the protocols and procedures used to evaluate the performance of the newest POC tests and determine their sensitivity during early HIV infection. METHODS: Project DETECT is a CDC-funded study that is evaluating POC HIV test performance. Part 1 is a cross-sectional, retrospective study comparing behavioral characteristics and HIV prevalence of the overall population of the Public Health–Seattle & King County (PHSKC) Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Clinic to Project DETECT participants enrolled in part 2. Part 2 is a cross-sectional, prospective study evaluating POC HIV tests in real time using unprocessed whole blood and oral fluid specimens. A POC nucleic acid test (NAT) was added to the panel of HIV tests in June 2018. Part 3 is a longitudinal, prospective study evaluating seroconversion sensitivity of POC HIV tests through serial follow-up testing. For comparison, HIV-1 RNA and HIV-1/HIV-2 antigen/antibody tests are also performed for participants enrolled in part 2 or 3. A behavioral survey that collects information about demographics, history of HIV testing, STD history, symptoms of acute HIV infection, substance use, sexual behaviors in the aggregate and with recent partners, and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis and antiretroviral therapy is completed at each part 2 or 3 visit. RESULTS: Between September 2015 and March 2019, there were 14,990 Project DETECT–eligible visits (part 1) to the PHSKC STD Clinic resulting in 1819 part 2 Project DETECT study visits. The longitudinal study within Project DETECT (part 3) enrolled 27 participants with discordant POC test results from their part 2 visit, and 10 (37%) were followed until they had fully seroconverted with concordant positive POC test results. Behavioral survey data and HIV test results, sensitivity, and specificity will be presented elsewhere. CONCLUSIONS: Studies such as Project DETECT are critical for evaluating POC HIV test devices as well as describing characteristics of persons at risk for HIV acquisition in the United States. HIV tests in development, including POC NATs, will provide new opportunities for HIV testing programs. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/16332 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7011122 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70111222020-03-05 Prospective Evaluation of HIV Testing Technologies in a Clinical Setting: Protocol for Project DETECT Stekler, Joanne D Violette, Lauren R Clark, Hollie A McDougal, Sarah J Niemann, Lisa A Katz, David A Chavez, Pollyanna R Wesolowski, Laura G Ethridge, Steven F McMahan, Vanessa M Cornelius-Hudson, Andy Delaney, Kevin P JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: HIV testing guidelines provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are continually changing to reflect advancements in new testing technology. Evaluation of existing and new point-of-care (POC) HIV tests is crucial to inform testing guidelines and provide information to clinicians and other HIV test providers. Characterizing the performance of POC HIV tests using unprocessed specimens can provide estimates for the window period of detection, or the time from HIV acquisition to test positivity, which allows clinicians and other HIV providers to select the appropriate POC HIV tests for persons who may be recently infected with HIV. OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the protocols and procedures used to evaluate the performance of the newest POC tests and determine their sensitivity during early HIV infection. METHODS: Project DETECT is a CDC-funded study that is evaluating POC HIV test performance. Part 1 is a cross-sectional, retrospective study comparing behavioral characteristics and HIV prevalence of the overall population of the Public Health–Seattle & King County (PHSKC) Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Clinic to Project DETECT participants enrolled in part 2. Part 2 is a cross-sectional, prospective study evaluating POC HIV tests in real time using unprocessed whole blood and oral fluid specimens. A POC nucleic acid test (NAT) was added to the panel of HIV tests in June 2018. Part 3 is a longitudinal, prospective study evaluating seroconversion sensitivity of POC HIV tests through serial follow-up testing. For comparison, HIV-1 RNA and HIV-1/HIV-2 antigen/antibody tests are also performed for participants enrolled in part 2 or 3. A behavioral survey that collects information about demographics, history of HIV testing, STD history, symptoms of acute HIV infection, substance use, sexual behaviors in the aggregate and with recent partners, and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis and antiretroviral therapy is completed at each part 2 or 3 visit. RESULTS: Between September 2015 and March 2019, there were 14,990 Project DETECT–eligible visits (part 1) to the PHSKC STD Clinic resulting in 1819 part 2 Project DETECT study visits. The longitudinal study within Project DETECT (part 3) enrolled 27 participants with discordant POC test results from their part 2 visit, and 10 (37%) were followed until they had fully seroconverted with concordant positive POC test results. Behavioral survey data and HIV test results, sensitivity, and specificity will be presented elsewhere. CONCLUSIONS: Studies such as Project DETECT are critical for evaluating POC HIV test devices as well as describing characteristics of persons at risk for HIV acquisition in the United States. HIV tests in development, including POC NATs, will provide new opportunities for HIV testing programs. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/16332 JMIR Publications 2020-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7011122/ /pubmed/32012115 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16332 Text en ©Joanne D Stekler, Lauren R Violette, Hollie A Clark, Sarah J McDougal, Lisa A Niemann, David A Katz, Pollyanna R Chavez, Laura G Wesolowski, Steven F Ethridge, Vanessa M McMahan, Andy Cornelius-Hudson, Kevin P Delaney. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 27.01.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Stekler, Joanne D Violette, Lauren R Clark, Hollie A McDougal, Sarah J Niemann, Lisa A Katz, David A Chavez, Pollyanna R Wesolowski, Laura G Ethridge, Steven F McMahan, Vanessa M Cornelius-Hudson, Andy Delaney, Kevin P Prospective Evaluation of HIV Testing Technologies in a Clinical Setting: Protocol for Project DETECT |
title | Prospective Evaluation of HIV Testing Technologies in a Clinical Setting: Protocol for Project DETECT |
title_full | Prospective Evaluation of HIV Testing Technologies in a Clinical Setting: Protocol for Project DETECT |
title_fullStr | Prospective Evaluation of HIV Testing Technologies in a Clinical Setting: Protocol for Project DETECT |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective Evaluation of HIV Testing Technologies in a Clinical Setting: Protocol for Project DETECT |
title_short | Prospective Evaluation of HIV Testing Technologies in a Clinical Setting: Protocol for Project DETECT |
title_sort | prospective evaluation of hiv testing technologies in a clinical setting: protocol for project detect |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7011122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32012115 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16332 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steklerjoanned prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect AT violettelaurenr prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect AT clarkholliea prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect AT mcdougalsarahj prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect AT niemannlisaa prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect AT katzdavida prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect AT chavezpollyannar prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect AT wesolowskilaurag prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect AT ethridgestevenf prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect AT mcmahanvanessam prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect AT corneliushudsonandy prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect AT delaneykevinp prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect |