Cargando…

Prospective Evaluation of HIV Testing Technologies in a Clinical Setting: Protocol for Project DETECT

BACKGROUND: HIV testing guidelines provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are continually changing to reflect advancements in new testing technology. Evaluation of existing and new point-of-care (POC) HIV tests is crucial to inform testing guidelines and provide information...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stekler, Joanne D, Violette, Lauren R, Clark, Hollie A, McDougal, Sarah J, Niemann, Lisa A, Katz, David A, Chavez, Pollyanna R, Wesolowski, Laura G, Ethridge, Steven F, McMahan, Vanessa M, Cornelius-Hudson, Andy, Delaney, Kevin P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7011122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32012115
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16332
_version_ 1783496009677012992
author Stekler, Joanne D
Violette, Lauren R
Clark, Hollie A
McDougal, Sarah J
Niemann, Lisa A
Katz, David A
Chavez, Pollyanna R
Wesolowski, Laura G
Ethridge, Steven F
McMahan, Vanessa M
Cornelius-Hudson, Andy
Delaney, Kevin P
author_facet Stekler, Joanne D
Violette, Lauren R
Clark, Hollie A
McDougal, Sarah J
Niemann, Lisa A
Katz, David A
Chavez, Pollyanna R
Wesolowski, Laura G
Ethridge, Steven F
McMahan, Vanessa M
Cornelius-Hudson, Andy
Delaney, Kevin P
author_sort Stekler, Joanne D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: HIV testing guidelines provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are continually changing to reflect advancements in new testing technology. Evaluation of existing and new point-of-care (POC) HIV tests is crucial to inform testing guidelines and provide information to clinicians and other HIV test providers. Characterizing the performance of POC HIV tests using unprocessed specimens can provide estimates for the window period of detection, or the time from HIV acquisition to test positivity, which allows clinicians and other HIV providers to select the appropriate POC HIV tests for persons who may be recently infected with HIV. OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the protocols and procedures used to evaluate the performance of the newest POC tests and determine their sensitivity during early HIV infection. METHODS: Project DETECT is a CDC-funded study that is evaluating POC HIV test performance. Part 1 is a cross-sectional, retrospective study comparing behavioral characteristics and HIV prevalence of the overall population of the Public Health–Seattle & King County (PHSKC) Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Clinic to Project DETECT participants enrolled in part 2. Part 2 is a cross-sectional, prospective study evaluating POC HIV tests in real time using unprocessed whole blood and oral fluid specimens. A POC nucleic acid test (NAT) was added to the panel of HIV tests in June 2018. Part 3 is a longitudinal, prospective study evaluating seroconversion sensitivity of POC HIV tests through serial follow-up testing. For comparison, HIV-1 RNA and HIV-1/HIV-2 antigen/antibody tests are also performed for participants enrolled in part 2 or 3. A behavioral survey that collects information about demographics, history of HIV testing, STD history, symptoms of acute HIV infection, substance use, sexual behaviors in the aggregate and with recent partners, and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis and antiretroviral therapy is completed at each part 2 or 3 visit. RESULTS: Between September 2015 and March 2019, there were 14,990 Project DETECT–eligible visits (part 1) to the PHSKC STD Clinic resulting in 1819 part 2 Project DETECT study visits. The longitudinal study within Project DETECT (part 3) enrolled 27 participants with discordant POC test results from their part 2 visit, and 10 (37%) were followed until they had fully seroconverted with concordant positive POC test results. Behavioral survey data and HIV test results, sensitivity, and specificity will be presented elsewhere. CONCLUSIONS: Studies such as Project DETECT are critical for evaluating POC HIV test devices as well as describing characteristics of persons at risk for HIV acquisition in the United States. HIV tests in development, including POC NATs, will provide new opportunities for HIV testing programs. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/16332
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7011122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70111222020-03-05 Prospective Evaluation of HIV Testing Technologies in a Clinical Setting: Protocol for Project DETECT Stekler, Joanne D Violette, Lauren R Clark, Hollie A McDougal, Sarah J Niemann, Lisa A Katz, David A Chavez, Pollyanna R Wesolowski, Laura G Ethridge, Steven F McMahan, Vanessa M Cornelius-Hudson, Andy Delaney, Kevin P JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: HIV testing guidelines provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are continually changing to reflect advancements in new testing technology. Evaluation of existing and new point-of-care (POC) HIV tests is crucial to inform testing guidelines and provide information to clinicians and other HIV test providers. Characterizing the performance of POC HIV tests using unprocessed specimens can provide estimates for the window period of detection, or the time from HIV acquisition to test positivity, which allows clinicians and other HIV providers to select the appropriate POC HIV tests for persons who may be recently infected with HIV. OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the protocols and procedures used to evaluate the performance of the newest POC tests and determine their sensitivity during early HIV infection. METHODS: Project DETECT is a CDC-funded study that is evaluating POC HIV test performance. Part 1 is a cross-sectional, retrospective study comparing behavioral characteristics and HIV prevalence of the overall population of the Public Health–Seattle & King County (PHSKC) Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Clinic to Project DETECT participants enrolled in part 2. Part 2 is a cross-sectional, prospective study evaluating POC HIV tests in real time using unprocessed whole blood and oral fluid specimens. A POC nucleic acid test (NAT) was added to the panel of HIV tests in June 2018. Part 3 is a longitudinal, prospective study evaluating seroconversion sensitivity of POC HIV tests through serial follow-up testing. For comparison, HIV-1 RNA and HIV-1/HIV-2 antigen/antibody tests are also performed for participants enrolled in part 2 or 3. A behavioral survey that collects information about demographics, history of HIV testing, STD history, symptoms of acute HIV infection, substance use, sexual behaviors in the aggregate and with recent partners, and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis and antiretroviral therapy is completed at each part 2 or 3 visit. RESULTS: Between September 2015 and March 2019, there were 14,990 Project DETECT–eligible visits (part 1) to the PHSKC STD Clinic resulting in 1819 part 2 Project DETECT study visits. The longitudinal study within Project DETECT (part 3) enrolled 27 participants with discordant POC test results from their part 2 visit, and 10 (37%) were followed until they had fully seroconverted with concordant positive POC test results. Behavioral survey data and HIV test results, sensitivity, and specificity will be presented elsewhere. CONCLUSIONS: Studies such as Project DETECT are critical for evaluating POC HIV test devices as well as describing characteristics of persons at risk for HIV acquisition in the United States. HIV tests in development, including POC NATs, will provide new opportunities for HIV testing programs. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/16332 JMIR Publications 2020-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7011122/ /pubmed/32012115 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16332 Text en ©Joanne D Stekler, Lauren R Violette, Hollie A Clark, Sarah J McDougal, Lisa A Niemann, David A Katz, Pollyanna R Chavez, Laura G Wesolowski, Steven F Ethridge, Vanessa M McMahan, Andy Cornelius-Hudson, Kevin P Delaney. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 27.01.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Stekler, Joanne D
Violette, Lauren R
Clark, Hollie A
McDougal, Sarah J
Niemann, Lisa A
Katz, David A
Chavez, Pollyanna R
Wesolowski, Laura G
Ethridge, Steven F
McMahan, Vanessa M
Cornelius-Hudson, Andy
Delaney, Kevin P
Prospective Evaluation of HIV Testing Technologies in a Clinical Setting: Protocol for Project DETECT
title Prospective Evaluation of HIV Testing Technologies in a Clinical Setting: Protocol for Project DETECT
title_full Prospective Evaluation of HIV Testing Technologies in a Clinical Setting: Protocol for Project DETECT
title_fullStr Prospective Evaluation of HIV Testing Technologies in a Clinical Setting: Protocol for Project DETECT
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Evaluation of HIV Testing Technologies in a Clinical Setting: Protocol for Project DETECT
title_short Prospective Evaluation of HIV Testing Technologies in a Clinical Setting: Protocol for Project DETECT
title_sort prospective evaluation of hiv testing technologies in a clinical setting: protocol for project detect
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7011122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32012115
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/16332
work_keys_str_mv AT steklerjoanned prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect
AT violettelaurenr prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect
AT clarkholliea prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect
AT mcdougalsarahj prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect
AT niemannlisaa prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect
AT katzdavida prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect
AT chavezpollyannar prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect
AT wesolowskilaurag prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect
AT ethridgestevenf prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect
AT mcmahanvanessam prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect
AT corneliushudsonandy prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect
AT delaneykevinp prospectiveevaluationofhivtestingtechnologiesinaclinicalsettingprotocolforprojectdetect