Cargando…

Genetic variants in migraine: a field synopsis and systematic re-analysis of meta-analyses

OBJECTIVE: Numerous genetic variants from meta-analyses of observational studies and GWAS were reported to be associated with migraine susceptibility. However, due to the random errors in meta-analyses, the noteworthiness of the results showing statistically significant remains doubtful. Thus, we pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Yating, Zhu, Ruixia, Xiao, Tongling, Liu, Xu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7011260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32046629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01087-5
_version_ 1783496033611808768
author Zhao, Yating
Zhu, Ruixia
Xiao, Tongling
Liu, Xu
author_facet Zhao, Yating
Zhu, Ruixia
Xiao, Tongling
Liu, Xu
author_sort Zhao, Yating
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Numerous genetic variants from meta-analyses of observational studies and GWAS were reported to be associated with migraine susceptibility. However, due to the random errors in meta-analyses, the noteworthiness of the results showing statistically significant remains doubtful. Thus, we performed this field synopsis and re-analysis study to evaluate the noteworthiness using a Bayesian approach in hope of finding true associations. METHODS: Relevant meta-analyses from observational studies and GWAS examining correlation between all genetic variants and migraine risk were included in our study by a PubMed search. Identification of noteworthy associations were analyzed by false-positive rate probability (FPRP) and Bayesian false discovery probability (BFDP). Using noteworthy variants, GO enrichment analysis were conducted through DAVID online tool. Then, the PPI network and hub genes were performed using STRING database and CytoHubba software. RESULTS: As for 8 significant genetic variants from observational studies, none of which showed noteworthy at prior probability of 0.001. Out of 47 significant genetic variants in GWAS, 36 were noteworthy at prior probability of 0.000001 via FPRP or BFDP. We further found the pathways “positive regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentration” and “inositol phosphate-mediated signaling” and hub genes including MEF2D, TSPAN2, PHACTR1, TRPM8 and PRDM16 related to migraine susceptibility. CONCLUSION: Herein, we have identified several noteworthy variants for migraine susceptibility in this field synopsis. We hope these data would help identify novel genetic biomarkers and potential therapeutic target for migraine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7011260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70112602020-02-13 Genetic variants in migraine: a field synopsis and systematic re-analysis of meta-analyses Zhao, Yating Zhu, Ruixia Xiao, Tongling Liu, Xu J Headache Pain Research Article OBJECTIVE: Numerous genetic variants from meta-analyses of observational studies and GWAS were reported to be associated with migraine susceptibility. However, due to the random errors in meta-analyses, the noteworthiness of the results showing statistically significant remains doubtful. Thus, we performed this field synopsis and re-analysis study to evaluate the noteworthiness using a Bayesian approach in hope of finding true associations. METHODS: Relevant meta-analyses from observational studies and GWAS examining correlation between all genetic variants and migraine risk were included in our study by a PubMed search. Identification of noteworthy associations were analyzed by false-positive rate probability (FPRP) and Bayesian false discovery probability (BFDP). Using noteworthy variants, GO enrichment analysis were conducted through DAVID online tool. Then, the PPI network and hub genes were performed using STRING database and CytoHubba software. RESULTS: As for 8 significant genetic variants from observational studies, none of which showed noteworthy at prior probability of 0.001. Out of 47 significant genetic variants in GWAS, 36 were noteworthy at prior probability of 0.000001 via FPRP or BFDP. We further found the pathways “positive regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentration” and “inositol phosphate-mediated signaling” and hub genes including MEF2D, TSPAN2, PHACTR1, TRPM8 and PRDM16 related to migraine susceptibility. CONCLUSION: Herein, we have identified several noteworthy variants for migraine susceptibility in this field synopsis. We hope these data would help identify novel genetic biomarkers and potential therapeutic target for migraine. Springer Milan 2020-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7011260/ /pubmed/32046629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01087-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhao, Yating
Zhu, Ruixia
Xiao, Tongling
Liu, Xu
Genetic variants in migraine: a field synopsis and systematic re-analysis of meta-analyses
title Genetic variants in migraine: a field synopsis and systematic re-analysis of meta-analyses
title_full Genetic variants in migraine: a field synopsis and systematic re-analysis of meta-analyses
title_fullStr Genetic variants in migraine: a field synopsis and systematic re-analysis of meta-analyses
title_full_unstemmed Genetic variants in migraine: a field synopsis and systematic re-analysis of meta-analyses
title_short Genetic variants in migraine: a field synopsis and systematic re-analysis of meta-analyses
title_sort genetic variants in migraine: a field synopsis and systematic re-analysis of meta-analyses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7011260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32046629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01087-5
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoyating geneticvariantsinmigraineafieldsynopsisandsystematicreanalysisofmetaanalyses
AT zhuruixia geneticvariantsinmigraineafieldsynopsisandsystematicreanalysisofmetaanalyses
AT xiaotongling geneticvariantsinmigraineafieldsynopsisandsystematicreanalysisofmetaanalyses
AT liuxu geneticvariantsinmigraineafieldsynopsisandsystematicreanalysisofmetaanalyses