Cargando…
Brucella melitensis B115-based ELISA to unravel false positive serologic reactions in bovine brucellosis: a field study
BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is a zoonosis whose incidence is not declining worldwide despite the global effort to control the disease. Accurate and precise diagnosis is a crucial step in any prophylaxis program but single tests to unequivocally detect animals infected with Brucella spp. are currently un...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7011277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32046738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02278-7 |
_version_ | 1783496037599543296 |
---|---|
author | Trotta, Adriana Marinaro, Mariarosaria Cirilli, Margie Sposato, Alessio Adone, Rosanna Beverelli, Matteo Buonavoglia, Domenico Corrente, Marialaura |
author_facet | Trotta, Adriana Marinaro, Mariarosaria Cirilli, Margie Sposato, Alessio Adone, Rosanna Beverelli, Matteo Buonavoglia, Domenico Corrente, Marialaura |
author_sort | Trotta, Adriana |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is a zoonosis whose incidence is not declining worldwide despite the global effort to control the disease. Accurate and precise diagnosis is a crucial step in any prophylaxis program but single tests to unequivocally detect animals infected with Brucella spp. are currently unavailable. In Italy, serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis is performed with two official tests: a rapid agglutination test (i.e., Rose Bengal Plate test, RBPT) and a complement fixation test (CFT) that detect antibodies directed mainly to the smooth lipopolysaccharide (S-LPS). Neither of the two tests is able to avoid the detection of false positive serological reactions (FPSRs) caused by bacteria sharing S-LPS components with Brucella spp. and responsible for the single reactors (SR) phenomenon. A B. melitensis R strain-based ELISA showed a good diagnostic performance in unravelling FP animals; however, since a limited number of animals were analyzed in that study, a large field study was conducted here to discriminate between Brucella-infected from FP animals, with the final aim of reducing the unnecessary slaughter of the latter. An ELISA based on a R strain of Brucella, i.e., Brucella melitensis B115, was employed to measure specific IgG responses in a collection of bovine sera (n = 648). Sera were obtained from 180 farms (either officially brucellosis-free or not brucellosis-free) recruited during an extended period of time (2014–2018) and were preliminarily assayed with the official tests by the Italian Reference Centers and then subjected to the ELISA. RESULTS: Negative sera, when subjected to the ELISA, gave O.D. values below the cutoff; SR sera, i.e. RBPT positive and CFT negative, as well as double positive (DP) sera, i.e. RBPT and CFT positive, gave O.D. values that were below the cutoff. All positive sera, i.e. from Brucella-infected animals, were RBPT positive and CFT positive (ICFTU ranging from 20 to 1280) and gave ELISA O.D. values above the cutoff. CONCLUSIONS: The B. melitensis B115-based ELISA systematically unravelled all false positive (FP) sera while confirming the diagnosis in Brucella-infected animals. Thus, the test employed in the present study may complement the official assays to avoid the costly slaughter of FP animals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7011277 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70112772020-02-14 Brucella melitensis B115-based ELISA to unravel false positive serologic reactions in bovine brucellosis: a field study Trotta, Adriana Marinaro, Mariarosaria Cirilli, Margie Sposato, Alessio Adone, Rosanna Beverelli, Matteo Buonavoglia, Domenico Corrente, Marialaura BMC Vet Res Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is a zoonosis whose incidence is not declining worldwide despite the global effort to control the disease. Accurate and precise diagnosis is a crucial step in any prophylaxis program but single tests to unequivocally detect animals infected with Brucella spp. are currently unavailable. In Italy, serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis is performed with two official tests: a rapid agglutination test (i.e., Rose Bengal Plate test, RBPT) and a complement fixation test (CFT) that detect antibodies directed mainly to the smooth lipopolysaccharide (S-LPS). Neither of the two tests is able to avoid the detection of false positive serological reactions (FPSRs) caused by bacteria sharing S-LPS components with Brucella spp. and responsible for the single reactors (SR) phenomenon. A B. melitensis R strain-based ELISA showed a good diagnostic performance in unravelling FP animals; however, since a limited number of animals were analyzed in that study, a large field study was conducted here to discriminate between Brucella-infected from FP animals, with the final aim of reducing the unnecessary slaughter of the latter. An ELISA based on a R strain of Brucella, i.e., Brucella melitensis B115, was employed to measure specific IgG responses in a collection of bovine sera (n = 648). Sera were obtained from 180 farms (either officially brucellosis-free or not brucellosis-free) recruited during an extended period of time (2014–2018) and were preliminarily assayed with the official tests by the Italian Reference Centers and then subjected to the ELISA. RESULTS: Negative sera, when subjected to the ELISA, gave O.D. values below the cutoff; SR sera, i.e. RBPT positive and CFT negative, as well as double positive (DP) sera, i.e. RBPT and CFT positive, gave O.D. values that were below the cutoff. All positive sera, i.e. from Brucella-infected animals, were RBPT positive and CFT positive (ICFTU ranging from 20 to 1280) and gave ELISA O.D. values above the cutoff. CONCLUSIONS: The B. melitensis B115-based ELISA systematically unravelled all false positive (FP) sera while confirming the diagnosis in Brucella-infected animals. Thus, the test employed in the present study may complement the official assays to avoid the costly slaughter of FP animals. BioMed Central 2020-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7011277/ /pubmed/32046738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02278-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Trotta, Adriana Marinaro, Mariarosaria Cirilli, Margie Sposato, Alessio Adone, Rosanna Beverelli, Matteo Buonavoglia, Domenico Corrente, Marialaura Brucella melitensis B115-based ELISA to unravel false positive serologic reactions in bovine brucellosis: a field study |
title | Brucella melitensis B115-based ELISA to unravel false positive serologic reactions in bovine brucellosis: a field study |
title_full | Brucella melitensis B115-based ELISA to unravel false positive serologic reactions in bovine brucellosis: a field study |
title_fullStr | Brucella melitensis B115-based ELISA to unravel false positive serologic reactions in bovine brucellosis: a field study |
title_full_unstemmed | Brucella melitensis B115-based ELISA to unravel false positive serologic reactions in bovine brucellosis: a field study |
title_short | Brucella melitensis B115-based ELISA to unravel false positive serologic reactions in bovine brucellosis: a field study |
title_sort | brucella melitensis b115-based elisa to unravel false positive serologic reactions in bovine brucellosis: a field study |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7011277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32046738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02278-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trottaadriana brucellamelitensisb115basedelisatounravelfalsepositiveserologicreactionsinbovinebrucellosisafieldstudy AT marinaromariarosaria brucellamelitensisb115basedelisatounravelfalsepositiveserologicreactionsinbovinebrucellosisafieldstudy AT cirillimargie brucellamelitensisb115basedelisatounravelfalsepositiveserologicreactionsinbovinebrucellosisafieldstudy AT sposatoalessio brucellamelitensisb115basedelisatounravelfalsepositiveserologicreactionsinbovinebrucellosisafieldstudy AT adonerosanna brucellamelitensisb115basedelisatounravelfalsepositiveserologicreactionsinbovinebrucellosisafieldstudy AT beverellimatteo brucellamelitensisb115basedelisatounravelfalsepositiveserologicreactionsinbovinebrucellosisafieldstudy AT buonavogliadomenico brucellamelitensisb115basedelisatounravelfalsepositiveserologicreactionsinbovinebrucellosisafieldstudy AT correntemarialaura brucellamelitensisb115basedelisatounravelfalsepositiveserologicreactionsinbovinebrucellosisafieldstudy |