Cargando…

Patient-oriented research competencies in health (PORCH) for researchers, patients, healthcare providers, and decision-makers: results of a scoping review

PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY: Background The Canadian Institutes of Health Research funded a program, “patient-oriented research” (POR), to change the way health research is done. POR involves patients and their families/caregivers as equal partners on research teams with researchers, healthcare providers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frisch, Noreen, Atherton, Pat, Doyle-Waters, Mary M., MacLeod, Martha L. P., Mallidou, Anastasia, Sheane, Vanessa, Ward, John, Woodley, Jinelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7011284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32055415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0180-0
_version_ 1783496039227981824
author Frisch, Noreen
Atherton, Pat
Doyle-Waters, Mary M.
MacLeod, Martha L. P.
Mallidou, Anastasia
Sheane, Vanessa
Ward, John
Woodley, Jinelle
author_facet Frisch, Noreen
Atherton, Pat
Doyle-Waters, Mary M.
MacLeod, Martha L. P.
Mallidou, Anastasia
Sheane, Vanessa
Ward, John
Woodley, Jinelle
author_sort Frisch, Noreen
collection PubMed
description PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY: Background The Canadian Institutes of Health Research funded a program, “patient-oriented research” (POR), to change the way health research is done. POR involves patients and their families/caregivers as equal partners on research teams with researchers, healthcare providers and decision-makers. The authors of this paper work through a unit in British Columbia, Canada that functions to help research teams learn how to do patient-oriented research. We felt that we could not train people if we didn’t first understand what others had learned about what competencies (knowledge, skills and attitudes) were helpful for members of these research teams. Method We used a method called a scoping review to search literature on patient-involved research. Our search included papers in academic journals as well as information on websites, training manuals, conference proceedings, governmental documents and statements from health organizations. Findings Writers reported the usefulness of many competencies for researchers and patients, with fewer competencies for healthcare providers or decision-makers. The main competencies for researchers had to do with participation, communication and conflict management; for patients they had to do with research knowledge and skills, cultural competence and participation. It was helpful that all team members want to work as part of a group for the public good. Conclusions We worked with an advisory group of people representing patients and their families/caregivers, researchers, healthcare providers and decision-makers to review our findings. We concluded that our competency statements are helpful for people to determine what they need to know or learn as they join research teams. ABSTRACT: Background The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) launched an initiative called the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) encouraging patient-oriented research (POR) that engages patients as equal partners in research teams alongside researchers, healthcare providers and health system decision-makers. Other countries have launched similar initiatives (POR-related work) yet there has never been full review of the competencies needed by individuals engaging in this work. Purpose and methods Our purpose was to summarize existing knowledge on POR and POR-related competencies by conducting a scoping review of peer-reviewed and grey literature. Our objectives were to systematically explore literature, articulate competencies necessary for research team members, identify research gaps and provide recommendations for further research. Using standard health databases and search methods, a total of 2036 sources was retrieved. Data were extracted from 35 peer-reviewed papers and 38 grey literature sources. We used an iterative process to reach consensus on competency statements. Findings and conclusions The main competencies for researchers were in categories of participation, communication and teamwork and conflict/tension management; for patients the main competencies were in research knowledge and skills, cultural competence/context and participation. While fewer competencies were documented for the other stakeholder groups, the need for understanding patient involvement in research and knowledge of the needs that research partners have are noted as competencies for healthcare providers and decision-makers. Attitudes demonstrating inclination to conduct the work were noted for all. The competencies can be used to consider learning needs of research team members and for team members wishing to assess their own readiness to serve on a POR or POR-related research team. Incidentally, we noted the lack of a common vocabulary used to describe patient-involved research, a situation making research and literature review/retrieval quite challenging. Recommendations for future research and for achieving consistency in language are addressed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7011284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70112842020-02-13 Patient-oriented research competencies in health (PORCH) for researchers, patients, healthcare providers, and decision-makers: results of a scoping review Frisch, Noreen Atherton, Pat Doyle-Waters, Mary M. MacLeod, Martha L. P. Mallidou, Anastasia Sheane, Vanessa Ward, John Woodley, Jinelle Res Involv Engagem Review Article PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY: Background The Canadian Institutes of Health Research funded a program, “patient-oriented research” (POR), to change the way health research is done. POR involves patients and their families/caregivers as equal partners on research teams with researchers, healthcare providers and decision-makers. The authors of this paper work through a unit in British Columbia, Canada that functions to help research teams learn how to do patient-oriented research. We felt that we could not train people if we didn’t first understand what others had learned about what competencies (knowledge, skills and attitudes) were helpful for members of these research teams. Method We used a method called a scoping review to search literature on patient-involved research. Our search included papers in academic journals as well as information on websites, training manuals, conference proceedings, governmental documents and statements from health organizations. Findings Writers reported the usefulness of many competencies for researchers and patients, with fewer competencies for healthcare providers or decision-makers. The main competencies for researchers had to do with participation, communication and conflict management; for patients they had to do with research knowledge and skills, cultural competence and participation. It was helpful that all team members want to work as part of a group for the public good. Conclusions We worked with an advisory group of people representing patients and their families/caregivers, researchers, healthcare providers and decision-makers to review our findings. We concluded that our competency statements are helpful for people to determine what they need to know or learn as they join research teams. ABSTRACT: Background The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) launched an initiative called the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) encouraging patient-oriented research (POR) that engages patients as equal partners in research teams alongside researchers, healthcare providers and health system decision-makers. Other countries have launched similar initiatives (POR-related work) yet there has never been full review of the competencies needed by individuals engaging in this work. Purpose and methods Our purpose was to summarize existing knowledge on POR and POR-related competencies by conducting a scoping review of peer-reviewed and grey literature. Our objectives were to systematically explore literature, articulate competencies necessary for research team members, identify research gaps and provide recommendations for further research. Using standard health databases and search methods, a total of 2036 sources was retrieved. Data were extracted from 35 peer-reviewed papers and 38 grey literature sources. We used an iterative process to reach consensus on competency statements. Findings and conclusions The main competencies for researchers were in categories of participation, communication and teamwork and conflict/tension management; for patients the main competencies were in research knowledge and skills, cultural competence/context and participation. While fewer competencies were documented for the other stakeholder groups, the need for understanding patient involvement in research and knowledge of the needs that research partners have are noted as competencies for healthcare providers and decision-makers. Attitudes demonstrating inclination to conduct the work were noted for all. The competencies can be used to consider learning needs of research team members and for team members wishing to assess their own readiness to serve on a POR or POR-related research team. Incidentally, we noted the lack of a common vocabulary used to describe patient-involved research, a situation making research and literature review/retrieval quite challenging. Recommendations for future research and for achieving consistency in language are addressed. BioMed Central 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7011284/ /pubmed/32055415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0180-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review Article
Frisch, Noreen
Atherton, Pat
Doyle-Waters, Mary M.
MacLeod, Martha L. P.
Mallidou, Anastasia
Sheane, Vanessa
Ward, John
Woodley, Jinelle
Patient-oriented research competencies in health (PORCH) for researchers, patients, healthcare providers, and decision-makers: results of a scoping review
title Patient-oriented research competencies in health (PORCH) for researchers, patients, healthcare providers, and decision-makers: results of a scoping review
title_full Patient-oriented research competencies in health (PORCH) for researchers, patients, healthcare providers, and decision-makers: results of a scoping review
title_fullStr Patient-oriented research competencies in health (PORCH) for researchers, patients, healthcare providers, and decision-makers: results of a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Patient-oriented research competencies in health (PORCH) for researchers, patients, healthcare providers, and decision-makers: results of a scoping review
title_short Patient-oriented research competencies in health (PORCH) for researchers, patients, healthcare providers, and decision-makers: results of a scoping review
title_sort patient-oriented research competencies in health (porch) for researchers, patients, healthcare providers, and decision-makers: results of a scoping review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7011284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32055415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0180-0
work_keys_str_mv AT frischnoreen patientorientedresearchcompetenciesinhealthporchforresearcherspatientshealthcareprovidersanddecisionmakersresultsofascopingreview
AT athertonpat patientorientedresearchcompetenciesinhealthporchforresearcherspatientshealthcareprovidersanddecisionmakersresultsofascopingreview
AT doylewatersmarym patientorientedresearchcompetenciesinhealthporchforresearcherspatientshealthcareprovidersanddecisionmakersresultsofascopingreview
AT macleodmarthalp patientorientedresearchcompetenciesinhealthporchforresearcherspatientshealthcareprovidersanddecisionmakersresultsofascopingreview
AT mallidouanastasia patientorientedresearchcompetenciesinhealthporchforresearcherspatientshealthcareprovidersanddecisionmakersresultsofascopingreview
AT sheanevanessa patientorientedresearchcompetenciesinhealthporchforresearcherspatientshealthcareprovidersanddecisionmakersresultsofascopingreview
AT wardjohn patientorientedresearchcompetenciesinhealthporchforresearcherspatientshealthcareprovidersanddecisionmakersresultsofascopingreview
AT woodleyjinelle patientorientedresearchcompetenciesinhealthporchforresearcherspatientshealthcareprovidersanddecisionmakersresultsofascopingreview