Cargando…

Bidirectional treatment of peritoneal metastasis with Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) and systemic chemotherapy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is used in the palliative treatment of peritoneal metastasis. The combination of intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy seems rational, and the aim of this systematic review was to compare PIPAC directed monotherapy with a bidir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ploug, Magnus, Graversen, Martin, Pfeiffer, Per, Mortensen, Michael Bau
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7011374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32041558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-6572-6
_version_ 1783496056595546112
author Ploug, Magnus
Graversen, Martin
Pfeiffer, Per
Mortensen, Michael Bau
author_facet Ploug, Magnus
Graversen, Martin
Pfeiffer, Per
Mortensen, Michael Bau
author_sort Ploug, Magnus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is used in the palliative treatment of peritoneal metastasis. The combination of intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy seems rational, and the aim of this systematic review was to compare PIPAC directed monotherapy with a bidirectional treatment approach (PIPAC in combination with systemic chemotherapy). Main outcomes were survival and quality of life. METHODS: A systematic literature search in Medline, Embase, Cochrane and the “Pleura and Peritoneum” was conducted and analyzed according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies in English reporting on bidirectional treatment with PIPAC and systemic chemotherapy and published before April 2019 were included. RESULTS: Twelve studies with a total of 386 patients were included. None were specifically designed to compare mono- versus bidirectional treatment, but 44% of the patients received bidirectional treatment. This was more frequent in women (non-gynecological cancers) and one-third of the bidirectional treated patients had received no prior chemotherapy. Data from the included studies provided no conclusions regarding survival or quality of life. CONCLUSION: Bidirectional treatment with PIPAC and systemic chemotherapy is practised and feasible, and some patients are enrolled having received no prior systemic chemotherapy for their PM. The difficulty in drawing any conclusions based on this systematic review has highlighted the urgent need to improve and standardize reports on PIPAC directed therapy. We have, therefore, constructed a list of items to be considered when reporting on clinical PIPAC research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO. Registration number: 90352, March 5, 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7011374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70113742020-02-14 Bidirectional treatment of peritoneal metastasis with Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) and systemic chemotherapy: a systematic review Ploug, Magnus Graversen, Martin Pfeiffer, Per Mortensen, Michael Bau BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is used in the palliative treatment of peritoneal metastasis. The combination of intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy seems rational, and the aim of this systematic review was to compare PIPAC directed monotherapy with a bidirectional treatment approach (PIPAC in combination with systemic chemotherapy). Main outcomes were survival and quality of life. METHODS: A systematic literature search in Medline, Embase, Cochrane and the “Pleura and Peritoneum” was conducted and analyzed according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies in English reporting on bidirectional treatment with PIPAC and systemic chemotherapy and published before April 2019 were included. RESULTS: Twelve studies with a total of 386 patients were included. None were specifically designed to compare mono- versus bidirectional treatment, but 44% of the patients received bidirectional treatment. This was more frequent in women (non-gynecological cancers) and one-third of the bidirectional treated patients had received no prior chemotherapy. Data from the included studies provided no conclusions regarding survival or quality of life. CONCLUSION: Bidirectional treatment with PIPAC and systemic chemotherapy is practised and feasible, and some patients are enrolled having received no prior systemic chemotherapy for their PM. The difficulty in drawing any conclusions based on this systematic review has highlighted the urgent need to improve and standardize reports on PIPAC directed therapy. We have, therefore, constructed a list of items to be considered when reporting on clinical PIPAC research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO. Registration number: 90352, March 5, 2018. BioMed Central 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7011374/ /pubmed/32041558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-6572-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ploug, Magnus
Graversen, Martin
Pfeiffer, Per
Mortensen, Michael Bau
Bidirectional treatment of peritoneal metastasis with Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) and systemic chemotherapy: a systematic review
title Bidirectional treatment of peritoneal metastasis with Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) and systemic chemotherapy: a systematic review
title_full Bidirectional treatment of peritoneal metastasis with Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) and systemic chemotherapy: a systematic review
title_fullStr Bidirectional treatment of peritoneal metastasis with Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) and systemic chemotherapy: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Bidirectional treatment of peritoneal metastasis with Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) and systemic chemotherapy: a systematic review
title_short Bidirectional treatment of peritoneal metastasis with Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) and systemic chemotherapy: a systematic review
title_sort bidirectional treatment of peritoneal metastasis with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (pipac) and systemic chemotherapy: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7011374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32041558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-6572-6
work_keys_str_mv AT plougmagnus bidirectionaltreatmentofperitonealmetastasiswithpressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacandsystemicchemotherapyasystematicreview
AT graversenmartin bidirectionaltreatmentofperitonealmetastasiswithpressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacandsystemicchemotherapyasystematicreview
AT pfeifferper bidirectionaltreatmentofperitonealmetastasiswithpressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacandsystemicchemotherapyasystematicreview
AT mortensenmichaelbau bidirectionaltreatmentofperitonealmetastasiswithpressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacandsystemicchemotherapyasystematicreview