Cargando…
Integration of mathematical model predictions into routine workflows to support clinical decision making in haematology
BACKGROUND: Individualization and patient-specific optimization of treatment is a major goal of modern health care. One way to achieve this goal is the application of high-resolution diagnostics together with the application of targeted therapies. However, the rising number of different treatment mo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7011438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32041606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1039-x |
_version_ | 1783496066899902464 |
---|---|
author | Hoffmann, Katja Cazemier, Katja Baldow, Christoph Schuster, Silvio Kheifetz, Yuri Schirm, Sibylle Horn, Matthias Ernst, Thomas Volgmann, Constanze Thiede, Christian Hochhaus, Andreas Bornhäuser, Martin Suttorp, Meinolf Scholz, Markus Glauche, Ingmar Loeffler, Markus Roeder, Ingo |
author_facet | Hoffmann, Katja Cazemier, Katja Baldow, Christoph Schuster, Silvio Kheifetz, Yuri Schirm, Sibylle Horn, Matthias Ernst, Thomas Volgmann, Constanze Thiede, Christian Hochhaus, Andreas Bornhäuser, Martin Suttorp, Meinolf Scholz, Markus Glauche, Ingmar Loeffler, Markus Roeder, Ingo |
author_sort | Hoffmann, Katja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Individualization and patient-specific optimization of treatment is a major goal of modern health care. One way to achieve this goal is the application of high-resolution diagnostics together with the application of targeted therapies. However, the rising number of different treatment modalities also induces new challenges: Whereas randomized clinical trials focus on proving average treatment effects in specific groups of patients, direct conclusions at the individual patient level are problematic. Thus, the identification of the best patient-specific treatment options remains an open question. Systems medicine, specifically mechanistic mathematical models, can substantially support individual treatment optimization. In addition to providing a better general understanding of disease mechanisms and treatment effects, these models allow for an identification of patient-specific parameterizations and, therefore, provide individualized predictions for the effect of different treatment modalities. RESULTS: In the following we describe a software framework that facilitates the integration of mathematical models and computer simulations into routine clinical processes to support decision-making. This is achieved by combining standard data management and data exploration tools, with the generation and visualization of mathematical model predictions for treatment options at an individual patient level. CONCLUSIONS: By integrating model results in an audit trail compatible manner into established clinical workflows, our framework has the potential to foster the use of systems-medical approaches in clinical practice. We illustrate the framework application by two use cases from the field of haematological oncology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7011438 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70114382020-02-14 Integration of mathematical model predictions into routine workflows to support clinical decision making in haematology Hoffmann, Katja Cazemier, Katja Baldow, Christoph Schuster, Silvio Kheifetz, Yuri Schirm, Sibylle Horn, Matthias Ernst, Thomas Volgmann, Constanze Thiede, Christian Hochhaus, Andreas Bornhäuser, Martin Suttorp, Meinolf Scholz, Markus Glauche, Ingmar Loeffler, Markus Roeder, Ingo BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Software BACKGROUND: Individualization and patient-specific optimization of treatment is a major goal of modern health care. One way to achieve this goal is the application of high-resolution diagnostics together with the application of targeted therapies. However, the rising number of different treatment modalities also induces new challenges: Whereas randomized clinical trials focus on proving average treatment effects in specific groups of patients, direct conclusions at the individual patient level are problematic. Thus, the identification of the best patient-specific treatment options remains an open question. Systems medicine, specifically mechanistic mathematical models, can substantially support individual treatment optimization. In addition to providing a better general understanding of disease mechanisms and treatment effects, these models allow for an identification of patient-specific parameterizations and, therefore, provide individualized predictions for the effect of different treatment modalities. RESULTS: In the following we describe a software framework that facilitates the integration of mathematical models and computer simulations into routine clinical processes to support decision-making. This is achieved by combining standard data management and data exploration tools, with the generation and visualization of mathematical model predictions for treatment options at an individual patient level. CONCLUSIONS: By integrating model results in an audit trail compatible manner into established clinical workflows, our framework has the potential to foster the use of systems-medical approaches in clinical practice. We illustrate the framework application by two use cases from the field of haematological oncology. BioMed Central 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7011438/ /pubmed/32041606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1039-x Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Software Hoffmann, Katja Cazemier, Katja Baldow, Christoph Schuster, Silvio Kheifetz, Yuri Schirm, Sibylle Horn, Matthias Ernst, Thomas Volgmann, Constanze Thiede, Christian Hochhaus, Andreas Bornhäuser, Martin Suttorp, Meinolf Scholz, Markus Glauche, Ingmar Loeffler, Markus Roeder, Ingo Integration of mathematical model predictions into routine workflows to support clinical decision making in haematology |
title | Integration of mathematical model predictions into routine workflows to support clinical decision making in haematology |
title_full | Integration of mathematical model predictions into routine workflows to support clinical decision making in haematology |
title_fullStr | Integration of mathematical model predictions into routine workflows to support clinical decision making in haematology |
title_full_unstemmed | Integration of mathematical model predictions into routine workflows to support clinical decision making in haematology |
title_short | Integration of mathematical model predictions into routine workflows to support clinical decision making in haematology |
title_sort | integration of mathematical model predictions into routine workflows to support clinical decision making in haematology |
topic | Software |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7011438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32041606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1039-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoffmannkatja integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology AT cazemierkatja integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology AT baldowchristoph integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology AT schustersilvio integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology AT kheifetzyuri integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology AT schirmsibylle integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology AT hornmatthias integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology AT ernstthomas integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology AT volgmannconstanze integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology AT thiedechristian integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology AT hochhausandreas integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology AT bornhausermartin integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology AT suttorpmeinolf integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology AT scholzmarkus integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology AT glaucheingmar integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology AT loefflermarkus integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology AT roederingo integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology |