Cargando…

Integration of mathematical model predictions into routine workflows to support clinical decision making in haematology

BACKGROUND: Individualization and patient-specific optimization of treatment is a major goal of modern health care. One way to achieve this goal is the application of high-resolution diagnostics together with the application of targeted therapies. However, the rising number of different treatment mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoffmann, Katja, Cazemier, Katja, Baldow, Christoph, Schuster, Silvio, Kheifetz, Yuri, Schirm, Sibylle, Horn, Matthias, Ernst, Thomas, Volgmann, Constanze, Thiede, Christian, Hochhaus, Andreas, Bornhäuser, Martin, Suttorp, Meinolf, Scholz, Markus, Glauche, Ingmar, Loeffler, Markus, Roeder, Ingo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7011438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32041606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1039-x
_version_ 1783496066899902464
author Hoffmann, Katja
Cazemier, Katja
Baldow, Christoph
Schuster, Silvio
Kheifetz, Yuri
Schirm, Sibylle
Horn, Matthias
Ernst, Thomas
Volgmann, Constanze
Thiede, Christian
Hochhaus, Andreas
Bornhäuser, Martin
Suttorp, Meinolf
Scholz, Markus
Glauche, Ingmar
Loeffler, Markus
Roeder, Ingo
author_facet Hoffmann, Katja
Cazemier, Katja
Baldow, Christoph
Schuster, Silvio
Kheifetz, Yuri
Schirm, Sibylle
Horn, Matthias
Ernst, Thomas
Volgmann, Constanze
Thiede, Christian
Hochhaus, Andreas
Bornhäuser, Martin
Suttorp, Meinolf
Scholz, Markus
Glauche, Ingmar
Loeffler, Markus
Roeder, Ingo
author_sort Hoffmann, Katja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individualization and patient-specific optimization of treatment is a major goal of modern health care. One way to achieve this goal is the application of high-resolution diagnostics together with the application of targeted therapies. However, the rising number of different treatment modalities also induces new challenges: Whereas randomized clinical trials focus on proving average treatment effects in specific groups of patients, direct conclusions at the individual patient level are problematic. Thus, the identification of the best patient-specific treatment options remains an open question. Systems medicine, specifically mechanistic mathematical models, can substantially support individual treatment optimization. In addition to providing a better general understanding of disease mechanisms and treatment effects, these models allow for an identification of patient-specific parameterizations and, therefore, provide individualized predictions for the effect of different treatment modalities. RESULTS: In the following we describe a software framework that facilitates the integration of mathematical models and computer simulations into routine clinical processes to support decision-making. This is achieved by combining standard data management and data exploration tools, with the generation and visualization of mathematical model predictions for treatment options at an individual patient level. CONCLUSIONS: By integrating model results in an audit trail compatible manner into established clinical workflows, our framework has the potential to foster the use of systems-medical approaches in clinical practice. We illustrate the framework application by two use cases from the field of haematological oncology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7011438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70114382020-02-14 Integration of mathematical model predictions into routine workflows to support clinical decision making in haematology Hoffmann, Katja Cazemier, Katja Baldow, Christoph Schuster, Silvio Kheifetz, Yuri Schirm, Sibylle Horn, Matthias Ernst, Thomas Volgmann, Constanze Thiede, Christian Hochhaus, Andreas Bornhäuser, Martin Suttorp, Meinolf Scholz, Markus Glauche, Ingmar Loeffler, Markus Roeder, Ingo BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Software BACKGROUND: Individualization and patient-specific optimization of treatment is a major goal of modern health care. One way to achieve this goal is the application of high-resolution diagnostics together with the application of targeted therapies. However, the rising number of different treatment modalities also induces new challenges: Whereas randomized clinical trials focus on proving average treatment effects in specific groups of patients, direct conclusions at the individual patient level are problematic. Thus, the identification of the best patient-specific treatment options remains an open question. Systems medicine, specifically mechanistic mathematical models, can substantially support individual treatment optimization. In addition to providing a better general understanding of disease mechanisms and treatment effects, these models allow for an identification of patient-specific parameterizations and, therefore, provide individualized predictions for the effect of different treatment modalities. RESULTS: In the following we describe a software framework that facilitates the integration of mathematical models and computer simulations into routine clinical processes to support decision-making. This is achieved by combining standard data management and data exploration tools, with the generation and visualization of mathematical model predictions for treatment options at an individual patient level. CONCLUSIONS: By integrating model results in an audit trail compatible manner into established clinical workflows, our framework has the potential to foster the use of systems-medical approaches in clinical practice. We illustrate the framework application by two use cases from the field of haematological oncology. BioMed Central 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7011438/ /pubmed/32041606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1039-x Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Software
Hoffmann, Katja
Cazemier, Katja
Baldow, Christoph
Schuster, Silvio
Kheifetz, Yuri
Schirm, Sibylle
Horn, Matthias
Ernst, Thomas
Volgmann, Constanze
Thiede, Christian
Hochhaus, Andreas
Bornhäuser, Martin
Suttorp, Meinolf
Scholz, Markus
Glauche, Ingmar
Loeffler, Markus
Roeder, Ingo
Integration of mathematical model predictions into routine workflows to support clinical decision making in haematology
title Integration of mathematical model predictions into routine workflows to support clinical decision making in haematology
title_full Integration of mathematical model predictions into routine workflows to support clinical decision making in haematology
title_fullStr Integration of mathematical model predictions into routine workflows to support clinical decision making in haematology
title_full_unstemmed Integration of mathematical model predictions into routine workflows to support clinical decision making in haematology
title_short Integration of mathematical model predictions into routine workflows to support clinical decision making in haematology
title_sort integration of mathematical model predictions into routine workflows to support clinical decision making in haematology
topic Software
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7011438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32041606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1039-x
work_keys_str_mv AT hoffmannkatja integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology
AT cazemierkatja integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology
AT baldowchristoph integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology
AT schustersilvio integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology
AT kheifetzyuri integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology
AT schirmsibylle integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology
AT hornmatthias integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology
AT ernstthomas integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology
AT volgmannconstanze integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology
AT thiedechristian integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology
AT hochhausandreas integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology
AT bornhausermartin integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology
AT suttorpmeinolf integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology
AT scholzmarkus integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology
AT glaucheingmar integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology
AT loefflermarkus integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology
AT roederingo integrationofmathematicalmodelpredictionsintoroutineworkflowstosupportclinicaldecisionmakinginhaematology