Cargando…

Avatar-based versus conventional vital sign display in a central monitor for monitoring multiple patients: a multicenter computer-based laboratory study

BACKGROUND: Maintaining adequate situation awareness is crucial for patient safety. Previous studies found that the use of avatar-based monitoring (Visual Patient Technology) improved the perception of vital signs compared to conventional monitoring showing numerical and waveform data; and was furth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garot, Olivier, Rössler, Julian, Pfarr, Juliane, Ganter, Michael T., Spahn, Donat R., Nöthiger, Christoph B., Tscholl, David W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7011453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32041584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1032-4
_version_ 1783496070223888384
author Garot, Olivier
Rössler, Julian
Pfarr, Juliane
Ganter, Michael T.
Spahn, Donat R.
Nöthiger, Christoph B.
Tscholl, David W.
author_facet Garot, Olivier
Rössler, Julian
Pfarr, Juliane
Ganter, Michael T.
Spahn, Donat R.
Nöthiger, Christoph B.
Tscholl, David W.
author_sort Garot, Olivier
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Maintaining adequate situation awareness is crucial for patient safety. Previous studies found that the use of avatar-based monitoring (Visual Patient Technology) improved the perception of vital signs compared to conventional monitoring showing numerical and waveform data; and was further associated with a reduction of perceived workload. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Visual Patient Technology on perceptive performance and perceived workload when monitoring multiple patients at the same time, such as in central station monitors in intensive care units or operating rooms. METHODS: A prospective, within-subject, computer-based laboratory study was performed in two tertiary care hospitals in Switzerland in 2018. Thirty-eight physician and nurse anesthetists volunteered for the study. The participants were shown four different central monitor scenarios in sequence, where each scenario displayed two critical and four healthy patients simultaneously for 10 or 30 s. After each scenario, participants had to recall the vital signs of the critical patients. Perceived workload was assessed with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task-Load-Index (NASA TLX) questionnaire. RESULTS: In the 10-s scenarios, the median number of remembered vital signs significantly improved from 7 to 11 using avatar-based versus conventional monitoring with a mean of differences of 4 vital signs, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2 to 6, p < 0.001. At the same time, the median NASA TLX scores were significantly lower for avatar-based monitoring (67 vs. 77) with a mean of differences of 6 points, 95% CI 0.5 to 11, p = 0.034. In the 30-s scenarios, vital sign perception and workload did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: In central monitor multiple patient monitoring, we found a significant improvement of vital sign perception and reduction of perceived workload using Visual Patient Technology, compared to conventional monitoring. The technology enabled improved assessment of patient status and may, thereby, help to increase situation awareness and enhance patient safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7011453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70114532020-02-14 Avatar-based versus conventional vital sign display in a central monitor for monitoring multiple patients: a multicenter computer-based laboratory study Garot, Olivier Rössler, Julian Pfarr, Juliane Ganter, Michael T. Spahn, Donat R. Nöthiger, Christoph B. Tscholl, David W. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Maintaining adequate situation awareness is crucial for patient safety. Previous studies found that the use of avatar-based monitoring (Visual Patient Technology) improved the perception of vital signs compared to conventional monitoring showing numerical and waveform data; and was further associated with a reduction of perceived workload. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Visual Patient Technology on perceptive performance and perceived workload when monitoring multiple patients at the same time, such as in central station monitors in intensive care units or operating rooms. METHODS: A prospective, within-subject, computer-based laboratory study was performed in two tertiary care hospitals in Switzerland in 2018. Thirty-eight physician and nurse anesthetists volunteered for the study. The participants were shown four different central monitor scenarios in sequence, where each scenario displayed two critical and four healthy patients simultaneously for 10 or 30 s. After each scenario, participants had to recall the vital signs of the critical patients. Perceived workload was assessed with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task-Load-Index (NASA TLX) questionnaire. RESULTS: In the 10-s scenarios, the median number of remembered vital signs significantly improved from 7 to 11 using avatar-based versus conventional monitoring with a mean of differences of 4 vital signs, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2 to 6, p < 0.001. At the same time, the median NASA TLX scores were significantly lower for avatar-based monitoring (67 vs. 77) with a mean of differences of 6 points, 95% CI 0.5 to 11, p = 0.034. In the 30-s scenarios, vital sign perception and workload did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: In central monitor multiple patient monitoring, we found a significant improvement of vital sign perception and reduction of perceived workload using Visual Patient Technology, compared to conventional monitoring. The technology enabled improved assessment of patient status and may, thereby, help to increase situation awareness and enhance patient safety. BioMed Central 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7011453/ /pubmed/32041584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1032-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Garot, Olivier
Rössler, Julian
Pfarr, Juliane
Ganter, Michael T.
Spahn, Donat R.
Nöthiger, Christoph B.
Tscholl, David W.
Avatar-based versus conventional vital sign display in a central monitor for monitoring multiple patients: a multicenter computer-based laboratory study
title Avatar-based versus conventional vital sign display in a central monitor for monitoring multiple patients: a multicenter computer-based laboratory study
title_full Avatar-based versus conventional vital sign display in a central monitor for monitoring multiple patients: a multicenter computer-based laboratory study
title_fullStr Avatar-based versus conventional vital sign display in a central monitor for monitoring multiple patients: a multicenter computer-based laboratory study
title_full_unstemmed Avatar-based versus conventional vital sign display in a central monitor for monitoring multiple patients: a multicenter computer-based laboratory study
title_short Avatar-based versus conventional vital sign display in a central monitor for monitoring multiple patients: a multicenter computer-based laboratory study
title_sort avatar-based versus conventional vital sign display in a central monitor for monitoring multiple patients: a multicenter computer-based laboratory study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7011453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32041584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1032-4
work_keys_str_mv AT garotolivier avatarbasedversusconventionalvitalsigndisplayinacentralmonitorformonitoringmultiplepatientsamulticentercomputerbasedlaboratorystudy
AT rosslerjulian avatarbasedversusconventionalvitalsigndisplayinacentralmonitorformonitoringmultiplepatientsamulticentercomputerbasedlaboratorystudy
AT pfarrjuliane avatarbasedversusconventionalvitalsigndisplayinacentralmonitorformonitoringmultiplepatientsamulticentercomputerbasedlaboratorystudy
AT gantermichaelt avatarbasedversusconventionalvitalsigndisplayinacentralmonitorformonitoringmultiplepatientsamulticentercomputerbasedlaboratorystudy
AT spahndonatr avatarbasedversusconventionalvitalsigndisplayinacentralmonitorformonitoringmultiplepatientsamulticentercomputerbasedlaboratorystudy
AT nothigerchristophb avatarbasedversusconventionalvitalsigndisplayinacentralmonitorformonitoringmultiplepatientsamulticentercomputerbasedlaboratorystudy
AT tscholldavidw avatarbasedversusconventionalvitalsigndisplayinacentralmonitorformonitoringmultiplepatientsamulticentercomputerbasedlaboratorystudy