Cargando…

Socially-assigned race and health: a scoping review with global implications for population health equity

Self-identified race/ethnicity is largely used to identify, monitor, and examine racial/ethnic inequalities. A growing body of work underscores the need to consider multiple dimensions of race – the social construction of race as a function of appearance, societal interactions, institutional dynamic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: White, Kellee, Lawrence, Jourdyn A., Tchangalova, Nedelina, Huang, Shuo J., Cummings, Jason L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7011480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32041629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-1137-5
_version_ 1783496077192724480
author White, Kellee
Lawrence, Jourdyn A.
Tchangalova, Nedelina
Huang, Shuo J.
Cummings, Jason L.
author_facet White, Kellee
Lawrence, Jourdyn A.
Tchangalova, Nedelina
Huang, Shuo J.
Cummings, Jason L.
author_sort White, Kellee
collection PubMed
description Self-identified race/ethnicity is largely used to identify, monitor, and examine racial/ethnic inequalities. A growing body of work underscores the need to consider multiple dimensions of race – the social construction of race as a function of appearance, societal interactions, institutional dynamics, stereotypes, and social norms. One such multidimensional measure is socially-assigned race, the perception of one’s race by others, that may serve as the basis for differential or unfair treatment and subsequently lead to deleterious health outcomes. We conducted a scoping review to systematically appraise the socially-assigned race and health literature. A systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science, 28 EBSCO databases and 24 Proquest databases up to September 2019 was conducted and supplemented by a manual search of reference lists and grey literature. Quantitative and qualitative studies that examined socially-assigned race and health or health-related outcomes were considered for inclusion. Eighteen articles were included in the narrative synthesis. Self-rated health and mental health were among the most frequent outcomes studied. The majority of studies were conducted in the United States, with fewer studies conducted in New Zealand, Canada, and Latin America. While most studies demonstrate a positive association between social assignment as a disadvantaged racial or ethnic group and poorer health, some studies did not document an association. We describe key conceptual and methodological considerations that should be prioritized in future studies examining socially-assigned race and health. Socially-assigned race can provide additional insight into observed differential health outcomes among racial/ethnic groups in racialized societies based upon their lived experiences. Studies incorporating socially-assigned race warrants further investigation and may be leveraged to examine nuanced patterns of racial health advantage and disadvantage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7011480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70114802020-02-14 Socially-assigned race and health: a scoping review with global implications for population health equity White, Kellee Lawrence, Jourdyn A. Tchangalova, Nedelina Huang, Shuo J. Cummings, Jason L. Int J Equity Health Review Self-identified race/ethnicity is largely used to identify, monitor, and examine racial/ethnic inequalities. A growing body of work underscores the need to consider multiple dimensions of race – the social construction of race as a function of appearance, societal interactions, institutional dynamics, stereotypes, and social norms. One such multidimensional measure is socially-assigned race, the perception of one’s race by others, that may serve as the basis for differential or unfair treatment and subsequently lead to deleterious health outcomes. We conducted a scoping review to systematically appraise the socially-assigned race and health literature. A systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science, 28 EBSCO databases and 24 Proquest databases up to September 2019 was conducted and supplemented by a manual search of reference lists and grey literature. Quantitative and qualitative studies that examined socially-assigned race and health or health-related outcomes were considered for inclusion. Eighteen articles were included in the narrative synthesis. Self-rated health and mental health were among the most frequent outcomes studied. The majority of studies were conducted in the United States, with fewer studies conducted in New Zealand, Canada, and Latin America. While most studies demonstrate a positive association between social assignment as a disadvantaged racial or ethnic group and poorer health, some studies did not document an association. We describe key conceptual and methodological considerations that should be prioritized in future studies examining socially-assigned race and health. Socially-assigned race can provide additional insight into observed differential health outcomes among racial/ethnic groups in racialized societies based upon their lived experiences. Studies incorporating socially-assigned race warrants further investigation and may be leveraged to examine nuanced patterns of racial health advantage and disadvantage. BioMed Central 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7011480/ /pubmed/32041629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-1137-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
White, Kellee
Lawrence, Jourdyn A.
Tchangalova, Nedelina
Huang, Shuo J.
Cummings, Jason L.
Socially-assigned race and health: a scoping review with global implications for population health equity
title Socially-assigned race and health: a scoping review with global implications for population health equity
title_full Socially-assigned race and health: a scoping review with global implications for population health equity
title_fullStr Socially-assigned race and health: a scoping review with global implications for population health equity
title_full_unstemmed Socially-assigned race and health: a scoping review with global implications for population health equity
title_short Socially-assigned race and health: a scoping review with global implications for population health equity
title_sort socially-assigned race and health: a scoping review with global implications for population health equity
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7011480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32041629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-1137-5
work_keys_str_mv AT whitekellee sociallyassignedraceandhealthascopingreviewwithglobalimplicationsforpopulationhealthequity
AT lawrencejourdyna sociallyassignedraceandhealthascopingreviewwithglobalimplicationsforpopulationhealthequity
AT tchangalovanedelina sociallyassignedraceandhealthascopingreviewwithglobalimplicationsforpopulationhealthequity
AT huangshuoj sociallyassignedraceandhealthascopingreviewwithglobalimplicationsforpopulationhealthequity
AT cummingsjasonl sociallyassignedraceandhealthascopingreviewwithglobalimplicationsforpopulationhealthequity