Cargando…

Validity and Reliability of the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale‐Thai Version (MDAS‐T) for Assessment of Delirium in Palliative Care Patients

BACKGROUND: Delirium, a neuropsychiatric syndrome that occurs throughout medical illness trajectories, is frequently misdiagnosed. The Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) is a commonly used tool in palliative care (PC) settings. Our objective was to establish and validate the Memorial Delirium...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klankluang, Watanachai, Pukrittayakamee, Panate, Atsariyasing, Wanlop, Siriussawakul, Arunotai, Chanthong, Pratamaporn, Tongsai, Sasima, Tayjasanant, Supakarn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7011635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32043769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0399
_version_ 1783496106487840768
author Klankluang, Watanachai
Pukrittayakamee, Panate
Atsariyasing, Wanlop
Siriussawakul, Arunotai
Chanthong, Pratamaporn
Tongsai, Sasima
Tayjasanant, Supakarn
author_facet Klankluang, Watanachai
Pukrittayakamee, Panate
Atsariyasing, Wanlop
Siriussawakul, Arunotai
Chanthong, Pratamaporn
Tongsai, Sasima
Tayjasanant, Supakarn
author_sort Klankluang, Watanachai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Delirium, a neuropsychiatric syndrome that occurs throughout medical illness trajectories, is frequently misdiagnosed. The Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) is a commonly used tool in palliative care (PC) settings. Our objective was to establish and validate the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale‐Thai version (MDAS‐T) in PC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MDAS was translated into Thai. Content validity, inter‐rater reliability, and internal consistency were explored. The construct validity of the MDAS‐T was analyzed using exploratory factor analysis. Instrument testing of the MDAS‐T, the Thai version of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM‐ICU‐T), and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition as the gold standard was performed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cutoff score. The duration of each assessment was recorded. RESULTS: The study enrolled 194 patients. The content validity index was 0.97. The intraclass correlation coefficient and Cronbach's α coefficient were 0.98 and 0.96, respectively. A principal component analysis indicated a homogeneous, one‐factor structure. The area under the ROC curve was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93–0.99). The best combination of sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) of the MDAS‐T were 0.92 (0.85–0.96) and 0.90 (0.82–0.94), respectively, with a cutoff score of 9, whereas the CAM‐ICU‐T yielded 0.58 (0.48–0.67) and 0.98 (0.93–0.99), respectively. The median MDAS‐T assessment time was 5 minutes. CONCLUSION: This study established and validated the MDAS‐T as a good and feasible tool for delirium screening and severity rating in PC settings. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Delirium is prevalent in palliative care (PC) settings and causes distress to patients and families, thereby making delirium screening necessary. This study found that the MDAS‐T is a highly objective and feasible test for delirium screening and severity monitoring in PC settings and can greatly improve the quality of care for this population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7011635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70116352020-03-12 Validity and Reliability of the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale‐Thai Version (MDAS‐T) for Assessment of Delirium in Palliative Care Patients Klankluang, Watanachai Pukrittayakamee, Panate Atsariyasing, Wanlop Siriussawakul, Arunotai Chanthong, Pratamaporn Tongsai, Sasima Tayjasanant, Supakarn Oncologist Symptom Management and Supportive Care BACKGROUND: Delirium, a neuropsychiatric syndrome that occurs throughout medical illness trajectories, is frequently misdiagnosed. The Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) is a commonly used tool in palliative care (PC) settings. Our objective was to establish and validate the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale‐Thai version (MDAS‐T) in PC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MDAS was translated into Thai. Content validity, inter‐rater reliability, and internal consistency were explored. The construct validity of the MDAS‐T was analyzed using exploratory factor analysis. Instrument testing of the MDAS‐T, the Thai version of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM‐ICU‐T), and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition as the gold standard was performed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cutoff score. The duration of each assessment was recorded. RESULTS: The study enrolled 194 patients. The content validity index was 0.97. The intraclass correlation coefficient and Cronbach's α coefficient were 0.98 and 0.96, respectively. A principal component analysis indicated a homogeneous, one‐factor structure. The area under the ROC curve was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93–0.99). The best combination of sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) of the MDAS‐T were 0.92 (0.85–0.96) and 0.90 (0.82–0.94), respectively, with a cutoff score of 9, whereas the CAM‐ICU‐T yielded 0.58 (0.48–0.67) and 0.98 (0.93–0.99), respectively. The median MDAS‐T assessment time was 5 minutes. CONCLUSION: This study established and validated the MDAS‐T as a good and feasible tool for delirium screening and severity rating in PC settings. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Delirium is prevalent in palliative care (PC) settings and causes distress to patients and families, thereby making delirium screening necessary. This study found that the MDAS‐T is a highly objective and feasible test for delirium screening and severity monitoring in PC settings and can greatly improve the quality of care for this population. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-11-07 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7011635/ /pubmed/32043769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0399 Text en © 2019 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Symptom Management and Supportive Care
Klankluang, Watanachai
Pukrittayakamee, Panate
Atsariyasing, Wanlop
Siriussawakul, Arunotai
Chanthong, Pratamaporn
Tongsai, Sasima
Tayjasanant, Supakarn
Validity and Reliability of the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale‐Thai Version (MDAS‐T) for Assessment of Delirium in Palliative Care Patients
title Validity and Reliability of the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale‐Thai Version (MDAS‐T) for Assessment of Delirium in Palliative Care Patients
title_full Validity and Reliability of the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale‐Thai Version (MDAS‐T) for Assessment of Delirium in Palliative Care Patients
title_fullStr Validity and Reliability of the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale‐Thai Version (MDAS‐T) for Assessment of Delirium in Palliative Care Patients
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Reliability of the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale‐Thai Version (MDAS‐T) for Assessment of Delirium in Palliative Care Patients
title_short Validity and Reliability of the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale‐Thai Version (MDAS‐T) for Assessment of Delirium in Palliative Care Patients
title_sort validity and reliability of the memorial delirium assessment scale‐thai version (mdas‐t) for assessment of delirium in palliative care patients
topic Symptom Management and Supportive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7011635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32043769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0399
work_keys_str_mv AT klankluangwatanachai validityandreliabilityofthememorialdeliriumassessmentscalethaiversionmdastforassessmentofdeliriuminpalliativecarepatients
AT pukrittayakameepanate validityandreliabilityofthememorialdeliriumassessmentscalethaiversionmdastforassessmentofdeliriuminpalliativecarepatients
AT atsariyasingwanlop validityandreliabilityofthememorialdeliriumassessmentscalethaiversionmdastforassessmentofdeliriuminpalliativecarepatients
AT siriussawakularunotai validityandreliabilityofthememorialdeliriumassessmentscalethaiversionmdastforassessmentofdeliriuminpalliativecarepatients
AT chanthongpratamaporn validityandreliabilityofthememorialdeliriumassessmentscalethaiversionmdastforassessmentofdeliriuminpalliativecarepatients
AT tongsaisasima validityandreliabilityofthememorialdeliriumassessmentscalethaiversionmdastforassessmentofdeliriuminpalliativecarepatients
AT tayjasanantsupakarn validityandreliabilityofthememorialdeliriumassessmentscalethaiversionmdastforassessmentofdeliriuminpalliativecarepatients