Cargando…

Integrating AI into radiology workflow: levels of research, production, and feedback maturity

We present a roadmap for integrating artificial intelligence (AI)-based image analysis algorithms into existing radiology workflows such that (1) radiologists can significantly benefit from enhanced automation in various imaging tasks due to AI, and (2) radiologists’ feedback is utilized to further...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dikici, Engin, Bigelow, Matthew, Prevedello, Luciano M., White, Richard D., Erdal, Barbaros S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7012173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32064302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.7.1.016502
_version_ 1783496192424935424
author Dikici, Engin
Bigelow, Matthew
Prevedello, Luciano M.
White, Richard D.
Erdal, Barbaros S.
author_facet Dikici, Engin
Bigelow, Matthew
Prevedello, Luciano M.
White, Richard D.
Erdal, Barbaros S.
author_sort Dikici, Engin
collection PubMed
description We present a roadmap for integrating artificial intelligence (AI)-based image analysis algorithms into existing radiology workflows such that (1) radiologists can significantly benefit from enhanced automation in various imaging tasks due to AI, and (2) radiologists’ feedback is utilized to further improve the AI application. This is achieved by establishing three maturity levels where (1) research enables the visualization of AI-based results/annotations by radiologists without generating new patient records; (2) production allows the AI-based system to generate results stored in an institution’s picture-archiving and communication system; and (3) feedback equips radiologists with tools for editing the AI inference results for periodic retraining of the deployed AI systems, thereby allowing continuous organic improvement of AI-based radiology-workflow solutions. A case study (i.e., detection of brain metastases with T1-weighted contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MRI) illustrates the deployment details of a particular AI-based application according to the aforementioned maturity levels. It is shown that the given AI application significantly improves with feedback coming from radiologists; the number of incorrectly detected brain metastases (false positives) decreases from 14.2 to 9.12 per patient with the number of subsequently annotated datasets increasing from 93 to 217 as a result of radiologist adjudication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7012173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70121732021-02-11 Integrating AI into radiology workflow: levels of research, production, and feedback maturity Dikici, Engin Bigelow, Matthew Prevedello, Luciano M. White, Richard D. Erdal, Barbaros S. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) PACS and Imaging Informatics We present a roadmap for integrating artificial intelligence (AI)-based image analysis algorithms into existing radiology workflows such that (1) radiologists can significantly benefit from enhanced automation in various imaging tasks due to AI, and (2) radiologists’ feedback is utilized to further improve the AI application. This is achieved by establishing three maturity levels where (1) research enables the visualization of AI-based results/annotations by radiologists without generating new patient records; (2) production allows the AI-based system to generate results stored in an institution’s picture-archiving and communication system; and (3) feedback equips radiologists with tools for editing the AI inference results for periodic retraining of the deployed AI systems, thereby allowing continuous organic improvement of AI-based radiology-workflow solutions. A case study (i.e., detection of brain metastases with T1-weighted contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MRI) illustrates the deployment details of a particular AI-based application according to the aforementioned maturity levels. It is shown that the given AI application significantly improves with feedback coming from radiologists; the number of incorrectly detected brain metastases (false positives) decreases from 14.2 to 9.12 per patient with the number of subsequently annotated datasets increasing from 93 to 217 as a result of radiologist adjudication. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2020-02-11 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7012173/ /pubmed/32064302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.7.1.016502 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
spellingShingle PACS and Imaging Informatics
Dikici, Engin
Bigelow, Matthew
Prevedello, Luciano M.
White, Richard D.
Erdal, Barbaros S.
Integrating AI into radiology workflow: levels of research, production, and feedback maturity
title Integrating AI into radiology workflow: levels of research, production, and feedback maturity
title_full Integrating AI into radiology workflow: levels of research, production, and feedback maturity
title_fullStr Integrating AI into radiology workflow: levels of research, production, and feedback maturity
title_full_unstemmed Integrating AI into radiology workflow: levels of research, production, and feedback maturity
title_short Integrating AI into radiology workflow: levels of research, production, and feedback maturity
title_sort integrating ai into radiology workflow: levels of research, production, and feedback maturity
topic PACS and Imaging Informatics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7012173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32064302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.7.1.016502
work_keys_str_mv AT dikiciengin integratingaiintoradiologyworkflowlevelsofresearchproductionandfeedbackmaturity
AT bigelowmatthew integratingaiintoradiologyworkflowlevelsofresearchproductionandfeedbackmaturity
AT prevedellolucianom integratingaiintoradiologyworkflowlevelsofresearchproductionandfeedbackmaturity
AT whiterichardd integratingaiintoradiologyworkflowlevelsofresearchproductionandfeedbackmaturity
AT erdalbarbaross integratingaiintoradiologyworkflowlevelsofresearchproductionandfeedbackmaturity