Cargando…

A qualitative exploration of Australian eyecare professional perspectives on Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) care

Despite the existence of evidence-based recommendations to decrease risk and progression of Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) for some time, self-reported practices suggest that eyecare professionals’ advice and people with AMD’s adherence to these recommendations can be very poor. This study u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jalbert, Isabelle, Rahardjo, Dian, Yashadhana, Aryati, Liew, Gerald, Gopinath, Bamini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7012424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32045445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228858
_version_ 1783496230644482048
author Jalbert, Isabelle
Rahardjo, Dian
Yashadhana, Aryati
Liew, Gerald
Gopinath, Bamini
author_facet Jalbert, Isabelle
Rahardjo, Dian
Yashadhana, Aryati
Liew, Gerald
Gopinath, Bamini
author_sort Jalbert, Isabelle
collection PubMed
description Despite the existence of evidence-based recommendations to decrease risk and progression of Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) for some time, self-reported practices suggest that eyecare professionals’ advice and people with AMD’s adherence to these recommendations can be very poor. This study uses qualitative methods to explore Australian eyecare professionals’ perspective on barriers to effective AMD care. Seven focus groups involving 65 optometrists were conducted by an experienced facilitator. A nominal group technique was used to identify, prioritize and semi-quantify barriers and enablers to AMD care. Participants individually ranked their perceived top five barriers and enablers with the most important granted a score of 5 and the least important a score of 1. For each barrier or enabler, the number of votes it received and its total score were recorded. Barriers and enablers selected by at least one participant in their top 5 were then qualitatively analysed, grouped using thematic analysis and total score calculated for each consolidated barrier or enabler. In-depth individual interviews were conducted with 10 ophthalmologists and 2 optometrists. Contributions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed with NVivo software. One hundred and sixty-nine barriers and 51 enablers to AMD care were identified in the focus groups. Of these, 102 barriers and 42 enablers were selected as one of their top 5 by at least one participant and further consolidated into 16 barriers and 10 enablers after thematic analysis. Factors impacting AMD care identified through analysis of the transcripts were coded to three categories of influence: patient-centered, practitioner-centered, and structural factors. Eyecare professionals considered poor care pathways, people with AMD’s poor disease understanding / denial, and cost of care / lack of funding, as the most significant barriers to AMD care; they considered shared care model, access, and communication as the most significant enablers to good AMD care. These findings suggest that Australian eyecare professionals perceive that there is a need for improved patient support systems and appropriately funded, clearer care pathway to benefit people with AMD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7012424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70124242020-02-21 A qualitative exploration of Australian eyecare professional perspectives on Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) care Jalbert, Isabelle Rahardjo, Dian Yashadhana, Aryati Liew, Gerald Gopinath, Bamini PLoS One Research Article Despite the existence of evidence-based recommendations to decrease risk and progression of Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) for some time, self-reported practices suggest that eyecare professionals’ advice and people with AMD’s adherence to these recommendations can be very poor. This study uses qualitative methods to explore Australian eyecare professionals’ perspective on barriers to effective AMD care. Seven focus groups involving 65 optometrists were conducted by an experienced facilitator. A nominal group technique was used to identify, prioritize and semi-quantify barriers and enablers to AMD care. Participants individually ranked their perceived top five barriers and enablers with the most important granted a score of 5 and the least important a score of 1. For each barrier or enabler, the number of votes it received and its total score were recorded. Barriers and enablers selected by at least one participant in their top 5 were then qualitatively analysed, grouped using thematic analysis and total score calculated for each consolidated barrier or enabler. In-depth individual interviews were conducted with 10 ophthalmologists and 2 optometrists. Contributions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed with NVivo software. One hundred and sixty-nine barriers and 51 enablers to AMD care were identified in the focus groups. Of these, 102 barriers and 42 enablers were selected as one of their top 5 by at least one participant and further consolidated into 16 barriers and 10 enablers after thematic analysis. Factors impacting AMD care identified through analysis of the transcripts were coded to three categories of influence: patient-centered, practitioner-centered, and structural factors. Eyecare professionals considered poor care pathways, people with AMD’s poor disease understanding / denial, and cost of care / lack of funding, as the most significant barriers to AMD care; they considered shared care model, access, and communication as the most significant enablers to good AMD care. These findings suggest that Australian eyecare professionals perceive that there is a need for improved patient support systems and appropriately funded, clearer care pathway to benefit people with AMD. Public Library of Science 2020-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7012424/ /pubmed/32045445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228858 Text en © 2020 Jalbert et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jalbert, Isabelle
Rahardjo, Dian
Yashadhana, Aryati
Liew, Gerald
Gopinath, Bamini
A qualitative exploration of Australian eyecare professional perspectives on Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) care
title A qualitative exploration of Australian eyecare professional perspectives on Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) care
title_full A qualitative exploration of Australian eyecare professional perspectives on Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) care
title_fullStr A qualitative exploration of Australian eyecare professional perspectives on Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) care
title_full_unstemmed A qualitative exploration of Australian eyecare professional perspectives on Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) care
title_short A qualitative exploration of Australian eyecare professional perspectives on Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) care
title_sort qualitative exploration of australian eyecare professional perspectives on age-related macular degeneration (amd) care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7012424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32045445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228858
work_keys_str_mv AT jalbertisabelle aqualitativeexplorationofaustralianeyecareprofessionalperspectivesonagerelatedmaculardegenerationamdcare
AT rahardjodian aqualitativeexplorationofaustralianeyecareprofessionalperspectivesonagerelatedmaculardegenerationamdcare
AT yashadhanaaryati aqualitativeexplorationofaustralianeyecareprofessionalperspectivesonagerelatedmaculardegenerationamdcare
AT liewgerald aqualitativeexplorationofaustralianeyecareprofessionalperspectivesonagerelatedmaculardegenerationamdcare
AT gopinathbamini aqualitativeexplorationofaustralianeyecareprofessionalperspectivesonagerelatedmaculardegenerationamdcare
AT jalbertisabelle qualitativeexplorationofaustralianeyecareprofessionalperspectivesonagerelatedmaculardegenerationamdcare
AT rahardjodian qualitativeexplorationofaustralianeyecareprofessionalperspectivesonagerelatedmaculardegenerationamdcare
AT yashadhanaaryati qualitativeexplorationofaustralianeyecareprofessionalperspectivesonagerelatedmaculardegenerationamdcare
AT liewgerald qualitativeexplorationofaustralianeyecareprofessionalperspectivesonagerelatedmaculardegenerationamdcare
AT gopinathbamini qualitativeexplorationofaustralianeyecareprofessionalperspectivesonagerelatedmaculardegenerationamdcare