Cargando…
Alternative donor transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in patients aged ≥50 years: young HLA-matched unrelated or haploidentical donor?
We sought to study whether survival after haploidentical transplantation is comparable to that after matched unrelated donor transplantation for 822 patients aged 50-75 years with acute myeloid leukemia in first or second complete remission. One hundred and ninety-two patients received grafts from h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ferrata Storti Foundation
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7012481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31101756 http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.215202 |
_version_ | 1783496240935206912 |
---|---|
author | Perales, Miguel-Angel Tomlinson, Benjamin Zhang, Mei-Jie St. Martin, Andrew Beitinjaneh, Amer Gibson, John Hogan, William Kekre, Natasha Lazarus, Hillard Marks, David McGuirk, Joseph Romee, Rizwan Solh, Melhem Wagner, John E. Weisdorf, Daniel J. de Lima, Marcos Eapen, Mary |
author_facet | Perales, Miguel-Angel Tomlinson, Benjamin Zhang, Mei-Jie St. Martin, Andrew Beitinjaneh, Amer Gibson, John Hogan, William Kekre, Natasha Lazarus, Hillard Marks, David McGuirk, Joseph Romee, Rizwan Solh, Melhem Wagner, John E. Weisdorf, Daniel J. de Lima, Marcos Eapen, Mary |
author_sort | Perales, Miguel-Angel |
collection | PubMed |
description | We sought to study whether survival after haploidentical transplantation is comparable to that after matched unrelated donor transplantation for 822 patients aged 50-75 years with acute myeloid leukemia in first or second complete remission. One hundred and ninety-two patients received grafts from haploidentical donors (sibling 25%; offspring 75%) and 631 patients from matched unrelated donors aged 18-40 years. Patients’ and disease characteristics of the two groups were similar except that recipients of matched unrelated donor transplantation were more likely to have poor risk cytogenetics and more likely to receive myeloablative conditioning regimens. Time from documented remission to transplant did not differ by donor type. Five-year overall survival was 32% and 42% after haploidentical and matched unrelated donor transplant, respectively (P=0.04). Multivariable analysis showed higher mortality (hazard ratio 1.27, P=0.04) and relapse (hazard ratio 1.32, P=0.04) after haploidentical transplantation, with similar non-relapse mortality risks. Chronic graft-versus-host disease was higher after matched unrelated donor compared to haploidentical transplantation when bone marrow was the graft (hazard ratio 3.12, P<0.001), but when the graft was peripheral blood, there was no difference in the risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease between donor types. These data support the view that matched unrelated donor transplant with donors younger than 40 years is to be preferred. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7012481 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Ferrata Storti Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70124812020-02-20 Alternative donor transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in patients aged ≥50 years: young HLA-matched unrelated or haploidentical donor? Perales, Miguel-Angel Tomlinson, Benjamin Zhang, Mei-Jie St. Martin, Andrew Beitinjaneh, Amer Gibson, John Hogan, William Kekre, Natasha Lazarus, Hillard Marks, David McGuirk, Joseph Romee, Rizwan Solh, Melhem Wagner, John E. Weisdorf, Daniel J. de Lima, Marcos Eapen, Mary Haematologica Article We sought to study whether survival after haploidentical transplantation is comparable to that after matched unrelated donor transplantation for 822 patients aged 50-75 years with acute myeloid leukemia in first or second complete remission. One hundred and ninety-two patients received grafts from haploidentical donors (sibling 25%; offspring 75%) and 631 patients from matched unrelated donors aged 18-40 years. Patients’ and disease characteristics of the two groups were similar except that recipients of matched unrelated donor transplantation were more likely to have poor risk cytogenetics and more likely to receive myeloablative conditioning regimens. Time from documented remission to transplant did not differ by donor type. Five-year overall survival was 32% and 42% after haploidentical and matched unrelated donor transplant, respectively (P=0.04). Multivariable analysis showed higher mortality (hazard ratio 1.27, P=0.04) and relapse (hazard ratio 1.32, P=0.04) after haploidentical transplantation, with similar non-relapse mortality risks. Chronic graft-versus-host disease was higher after matched unrelated donor compared to haploidentical transplantation when bone marrow was the graft (hazard ratio 3.12, P<0.001), but when the graft was peripheral blood, there was no difference in the risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease between donor types. These data support the view that matched unrelated donor transplant with donors younger than 40 years is to be preferred. Ferrata Storti Foundation 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7012481/ /pubmed/31101756 http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.215202 Text en Copyright© 2020 Ferrata Storti Foundation Material published in Haematologica is covered by copyright. All rights are reserved to the Ferrata Storti Foundation. Use of published material is allowed under the following terms and conditions: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode. Copies of published material are allowed for personal or internal use. Sharing published material for non-commercial purposes is subject to the following conditions: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode, sect. 3. Reproducing and sharing published material for commercial purposes is not allowed without permission in writing from the publisher. |
spellingShingle | Article Perales, Miguel-Angel Tomlinson, Benjamin Zhang, Mei-Jie St. Martin, Andrew Beitinjaneh, Amer Gibson, John Hogan, William Kekre, Natasha Lazarus, Hillard Marks, David McGuirk, Joseph Romee, Rizwan Solh, Melhem Wagner, John E. Weisdorf, Daniel J. de Lima, Marcos Eapen, Mary Alternative donor transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in patients aged ≥50 years: young HLA-matched unrelated or haploidentical donor? |
title | Alternative donor transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in patients aged ≥50 years: young HLA-matched unrelated or haploidentical donor? |
title_full | Alternative donor transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in patients aged ≥50 years: young HLA-matched unrelated or haploidentical donor? |
title_fullStr | Alternative donor transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in patients aged ≥50 years: young HLA-matched unrelated or haploidentical donor? |
title_full_unstemmed | Alternative donor transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in patients aged ≥50 years: young HLA-matched unrelated or haploidentical donor? |
title_short | Alternative donor transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in patients aged ≥50 years: young HLA-matched unrelated or haploidentical donor? |
title_sort | alternative donor transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in patients aged ≥50 years: young hla-matched unrelated or haploidentical donor? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7012481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31101756 http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.215202 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peralesmiguelangel alternativedonortransplantationforacutemyeloidleukemiainpatientsaged50yearsyounghlamatchedunrelatedorhaploidenticaldonor AT tomlinsonbenjamin alternativedonortransplantationforacutemyeloidleukemiainpatientsaged50yearsyounghlamatchedunrelatedorhaploidenticaldonor AT zhangmeijie alternativedonortransplantationforacutemyeloidleukemiainpatientsaged50yearsyounghlamatchedunrelatedorhaploidenticaldonor AT stmartinandrew alternativedonortransplantationforacutemyeloidleukemiainpatientsaged50yearsyounghlamatchedunrelatedorhaploidenticaldonor AT beitinjanehamer alternativedonortransplantationforacutemyeloidleukemiainpatientsaged50yearsyounghlamatchedunrelatedorhaploidenticaldonor AT gibsonjohn alternativedonortransplantationforacutemyeloidleukemiainpatientsaged50yearsyounghlamatchedunrelatedorhaploidenticaldonor AT hoganwilliam alternativedonortransplantationforacutemyeloidleukemiainpatientsaged50yearsyounghlamatchedunrelatedorhaploidenticaldonor AT kekrenatasha alternativedonortransplantationforacutemyeloidleukemiainpatientsaged50yearsyounghlamatchedunrelatedorhaploidenticaldonor AT lazarushillard alternativedonortransplantationforacutemyeloidleukemiainpatientsaged50yearsyounghlamatchedunrelatedorhaploidenticaldonor AT marksdavid alternativedonortransplantationforacutemyeloidleukemiainpatientsaged50yearsyounghlamatchedunrelatedorhaploidenticaldonor AT mcguirkjoseph alternativedonortransplantationforacutemyeloidleukemiainpatientsaged50yearsyounghlamatchedunrelatedorhaploidenticaldonor AT romeerizwan alternativedonortransplantationforacutemyeloidleukemiainpatientsaged50yearsyounghlamatchedunrelatedorhaploidenticaldonor AT solhmelhem alternativedonortransplantationforacutemyeloidleukemiainpatientsaged50yearsyounghlamatchedunrelatedorhaploidenticaldonor AT wagnerjohne alternativedonortransplantationforacutemyeloidleukemiainpatientsaged50yearsyounghlamatchedunrelatedorhaploidenticaldonor AT weisdorfdanielj alternativedonortransplantationforacutemyeloidleukemiainpatientsaged50yearsyounghlamatchedunrelatedorhaploidenticaldonor AT delimamarcos alternativedonortransplantationforacutemyeloidleukemiainpatientsaged50yearsyounghlamatchedunrelatedorhaploidenticaldonor AT eapenmary alternativedonortransplantationforacutemyeloidleukemiainpatientsaged50yearsyounghlamatchedunrelatedorhaploidenticaldonor |