Cargando…

Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation With or Without Barrier Membrane Coverage of the Lateral Window: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES: Test the hypothesis of no difference in implant treatment outcomes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with or without barrier membrane coverage of the lateral window. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane library search in combination with a hand-search of r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Starch-Jensen, Thomas, Deluiz, Daniel, Duch, Kirsten, Tinoco, Eduardo Muniz Barretto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Stilus Optimus 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7012617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32158525
http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2019.10401
_version_ 1783496261179015168
author Starch-Jensen, Thomas
Deluiz, Daniel
Duch, Kirsten
Tinoco, Eduardo Muniz Barretto
author_facet Starch-Jensen, Thomas
Deluiz, Daniel
Duch, Kirsten
Tinoco, Eduardo Muniz Barretto
author_sort Starch-Jensen, Thomas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Test the hypothesis of no difference in implant treatment outcomes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with or without barrier membrane coverage of the lateral window. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane library search in combination with a hand-search of relevant journals was conducted. Human studies published in English until the 5th of July, 2019 were included. Randomised controlled trials and controlled trials with an observation period of minimum six months were included. Primary outcomes included survival of suprastructures and implants. Secondary outcomes included implant stability quotient, peri-implant marginal bone loss, bone regeneration, patient-reported outcome measures, biologic and mechanical complications. RESULTS: The electronic search and hand-searching resulted in 1068 entries. Six randomised controlled trials characterised by low to high risk of bias and one controlled trial with high risk of bias fulfilled the inclusion criteria. High implant survival rate was reported with both treatment modalities. Meta-analyses disclosed a mean difference of newly formed bone of 6.4% (confidence interval = 0 to 12.9) and non-mineralised tissue of -1.1% (confidence interval = -2.7 to 0.5), indicating more newly formed bone and diminished non-mineralised with barrier membrane coverage. CONCLUSIONS: There seem to be no statistically significant differences in implant treatment outcomes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with or without barrier membrane coverage of the lateral window. However, barrier membrane coverage increases percentage of newly formed bone and diminishes proliferation of non-mineralised tissue. Thus, barrier membrane coverage seems to be beneficial and also preventing displacement of the grafting material.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7012617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Stilus Optimus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70126172020-03-10 Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation With or Without Barrier Membrane Coverage of the Lateral Window: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Starch-Jensen, Thomas Deluiz, Daniel Duch, Kirsten Tinoco, Eduardo Muniz Barretto J Oral Maxillofac Res Literature Review OBJECTIVES: Test the hypothesis of no difference in implant treatment outcomes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with or without barrier membrane coverage of the lateral window. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane library search in combination with a hand-search of relevant journals was conducted. Human studies published in English until the 5th of July, 2019 were included. Randomised controlled trials and controlled trials with an observation period of minimum six months were included. Primary outcomes included survival of suprastructures and implants. Secondary outcomes included implant stability quotient, peri-implant marginal bone loss, bone regeneration, patient-reported outcome measures, biologic and mechanical complications. RESULTS: The electronic search and hand-searching resulted in 1068 entries. Six randomised controlled trials characterised by low to high risk of bias and one controlled trial with high risk of bias fulfilled the inclusion criteria. High implant survival rate was reported with both treatment modalities. Meta-analyses disclosed a mean difference of newly formed bone of 6.4% (confidence interval = 0 to 12.9) and non-mineralised tissue of -1.1% (confidence interval = -2.7 to 0.5), indicating more newly formed bone and diminished non-mineralised with barrier membrane coverage. CONCLUSIONS: There seem to be no statistically significant differences in implant treatment outcomes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with or without barrier membrane coverage of the lateral window. However, barrier membrane coverage increases percentage of newly formed bone and diminishes proliferation of non-mineralised tissue. Thus, barrier membrane coverage seems to be beneficial and also preventing displacement of the grafting material. Stilus Optimus 2019-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7012617/ /pubmed/32158525 http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2019.10401 Text en Copyright © Starch-Jensen T, Deluiz D, Duch K, Tinoco EMB. Published in the JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH (http://www.ejomr.org), 30 December 2019. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article, first published in the JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 UnportedLicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work and is properly cited. The copyright, license information and link to the original publication on (http://www.ejomr.org) must be included.
spellingShingle Literature Review
Starch-Jensen, Thomas
Deluiz, Daniel
Duch, Kirsten
Tinoco, Eduardo Muniz Barretto
Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation With or Without Barrier Membrane Coverage of the Lateral Window: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation With or Without Barrier Membrane Coverage of the Lateral Window: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation With or Without Barrier Membrane Coverage of the Lateral Window: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation With or Without Barrier Membrane Coverage of the Lateral Window: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation With or Without Barrier Membrane Coverage of the Lateral Window: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation With or Without Barrier Membrane Coverage of the Lateral Window: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort maxillary sinus floor augmentation with or without barrier membrane coverage of the lateral window: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Literature Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7012617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32158525
http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2019.10401
work_keys_str_mv AT starchjensenthomas maxillarysinusflooraugmentationwithorwithoutbarriermembranecoverageofthelateralwindowasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT deluizdaniel maxillarysinusflooraugmentationwithorwithoutbarriermembranecoverageofthelateralwindowasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT duchkirsten maxillarysinusflooraugmentationwithorwithoutbarriermembranecoverageofthelateralwindowasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tinocoeduardomunizbarretto maxillarysinusflooraugmentationwithorwithoutbarriermembranecoverageofthelateralwindowasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis