Cargando…

Causal underpinnings of working memory and Stroop interference control: Testing the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS over the left DLPFC

By means of transcranial direct current stimulation applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, we investigated the causal role of increased or decreased excitability of this brain region for two facets of executive functions: working memory and Stroop interference control. We tested 1) whet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baumert, Anna, Buchholz, Nita, Zinkernagel, Axel, Clarke, Patrick, MacLeod, Colin, Osinsky, Roman, Schmitt, Manfred
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7012981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31183619
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00726-y
_version_ 1783496317830430720
author Baumert, Anna
Buchholz, Nita
Zinkernagel, Axel
Clarke, Patrick
MacLeod, Colin
Osinsky, Roman
Schmitt, Manfred
author_facet Baumert, Anna
Buchholz, Nita
Zinkernagel, Axel
Clarke, Patrick
MacLeod, Colin
Osinsky, Roman
Schmitt, Manfred
author_sort Baumert, Anna
collection PubMed
description By means of transcranial direct current stimulation applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, we investigated the causal role of increased or decreased excitability of this brain region for two facets of executive functions: working memory and Stroop interference control. We tested 1) whether anodal tDCS of the left DLPFC enhances working memory 15 minutes after termination of stimulation and in the absence of direct task practice under stimulation; 2) whether anodal tDCS of the left DLPFC enhances interference control, as evidenced by Stroop performance and Stroop sequence effects; and 3) whether cathodal tDCS leads to compromised executive functioning compared to anodal stimulation. In a between-subject design with 88 healthy psychology students, we compared the impact of anodal and cathodal stimulation against a sham condition, on performance on a Stroop task (during active stimulation) and on an n-back task (completed 15 minutes after active stimulation ended). We found significantly enhanced accuracy in the n-back task after anodal stimulation compared with sham, as well as speeded reactions in the Stroop tasks independent of trial type. By contrast, we found no modulation of Stroop interference effects or Stroop sequence effects. No inhibitory effects of cathodal stimulation were observed. These results support the causal role of the left DLPFC in working memory but lend no support to its involvement in Stroop interference control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7012981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70129812020-02-26 Causal underpinnings of working memory and Stroop interference control: Testing the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS over the left DLPFC Baumert, Anna Buchholz, Nita Zinkernagel, Axel Clarke, Patrick MacLeod, Colin Osinsky, Roman Schmitt, Manfred Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Research Article By means of transcranial direct current stimulation applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, we investigated the causal role of increased or decreased excitability of this brain region for two facets of executive functions: working memory and Stroop interference control. We tested 1) whether anodal tDCS of the left DLPFC enhances working memory 15 minutes after termination of stimulation and in the absence of direct task practice under stimulation; 2) whether anodal tDCS of the left DLPFC enhances interference control, as evidenced by Stroop performance and Stroop sequence effects; and 3) whether cathodal tDCS leads to compromised executive functioning compared to anodal stimulation. In a between-subject design with 88 healthy psychology students, we compared the impact of anodal and cathodal stimulation against a sham condition, on performance on a Stroop task (during active stimulation) and on an n-back task (completed 15 minutes after active stimulation ended). We found significantly enhanced accuracy in the n-back task after anodal stimulation compared with sham, as well as speeded reactions in the Stroop tasks independent of trial type. By contrast, we found no modulation of Stroop interference effects or Stroop sequence effects. No inhibitory effects of cathodal stimulation were observed. These results support the causal role of the left DLPFC in working memory but lend no support to its involvement in Stroop interference control. Springer US 2019-06-10 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7012981/ /pubmed/31183619 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00726-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baumert, Anna
Buchholz, Nita
Zinkernagel, Axel
Clarke, Patrick
MacLeod, Colin
Osinsky, Roman
Schmitt, Manfred
Causal underpinnings of working memory and Stroop interference control: Testing the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS over the left DLPFC
title Causal underpinnings of working memory and Stroop interference control: Testing the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS over the left DLPFC
title_full Causal underpinnings of working memory and Stroop interference control: Testing the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS over the left DLPFC
title_fullStr Causal underpinnings of working memory and Stroop interference control: Testing the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS over the left DLPFC
title_full_unstemmed Causal underpinnings of working memory and Stroop interference control: Testing the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS over the left DLPFC
title_short Causal underpinnings of working memory and Stroop interference control: Testing the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS over the left DLPFC
title_sort causal underpinnings of working memory and stroop interference control: testing the effects of anodal and cathodal tdcs over the left dlpfc
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7012981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31183619
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00726-y
work_keys_str_mv AT baumertanna causalunderpinningsofworkingmemoryandstroopinterferencecontroltestingtheeffectsofanodalandcathodaltdcsovertheleftdlpfc
AT buchholznita causalunderpinningsofworkingmemoryandstroopinterferencecontroltestingtheeffectsofanodalandcathodaltdcsovertheleftdlpfc
AT zinkernagelaxel causalunderpinningsofworkingmemoryandstroopinterferencecontroltestingtheeffectsofanodalandcathodaltdcsovertheleftdlpfc
AT clarkepatrick causalunderpinningsofworkingmemoryandstroopinterferencecontroltestingtheeffectsofanodalandcathodaltdcsovertheleftdlpfc
AT macleodcolin causalunderpinningsofworkingmemoryandstroopinterferencecontroltestingtheeffectsofanodalandcathodaltdcsovertheleftdlpfc
AT osinskyroman causalunderpinningsofworkingmemoryandstroopinterferencecontroltestingtheeffectsofanodalandcathodaltdcsovertheleftdlpfc
AT schmittmanfred causalunderpinningsofworkingmemoryandstroopinterferencecontroltestingtheeffectsofanodalandcathodaltdcsovertheleftdlpfc