Cargando…
Causal underpinnings of working memory and Stroop interference control: Testing the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS over the left DLPFC
By means of transcranial direct current stimulation applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, we investigated the causal role of increased or decreased excitability of this brain region for two facets of executive functions: working memory and Stroop interference control. We tested 1) whet...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7012981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31183619 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00726-y |
_version_ | 1783496317830430720 |
---|---|
author | Baumert, Anna Buchholz, Nita Zinkernagel, Axel Clarke, Patrick MacLeod, Colin Osinsky, Roman Schmitt, Manfred |
author_facet | Baumert, Anna Buchholz, Nita Zinkernagel, Axel Clarke, Patrick MacLeod, Colin Osinsky, Roman Schmitt, Manfred |
author_sort | Baumert, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | By means of transcranial direct current stimulation applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, we investigated the causal role of increased or decreased excitability of this brain region for two facets of executive functions: working memory and Stroop interference control. We tested 1) whether anodal tDCS of the left DLPFC enhances working memory 15 minutes after termination of stimulation and in the absence of direct task practice under stimulation; 2) whether anodal tDCS of the left DLPFC enhances interference control, as evidenced by Stroop performance and Stroop sequence effects; and 3) whether cathodal tDCS leads to compromised executive functioning compared to anodal stimulation. In a between-subject design with 88 healthy psychology students, we compared the impact of anodal and cathodal stimulation against a sham condition, on performance on a Stroop task (during active stimulation) and on an n-back task (completed 15 minutes after active stimulation ended). We found significantly enhanced accuracy in the n-back task after anodal stimulation compared with sham, as well as speeded reactions in the Stroop tasks independent of trial type. By contrast, we found no modulation of Stroop interference effects or Stroop sequence effects. No inhibitory effects of cathodal stimulation were observed. These results support the causal role of the left DLPFC in working memory but lend no support to its involvement in Stroop interference control. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7012981 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70129812020-02-26 Causal underpinnings of working memory and Stroop interference control: Testing the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS over the left DLPFC Baumert, Anna Buchholz, Nita Zinkernagel, Axel Clarke, Patrick MacLeod, Colin Osinsky, Roman Schmitt, Manfred Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Research Article By means of transcranial direct current stimulation applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, we investigated the causal role of increased or decreased excitability of this brain region for two facets of executive functions: working memory and Stroop interference control. We tested 1) whether anodal tDCS of the left DLPFC enhances working memory 15 minutes after termination of stimulation and in the absence of direct task practice under stimulation; 2) whether anodal tDCS of the left DLPFC enhances interference control, as evidenced by Stroop performance and Stroop sequence effects; and 3) whether cathodal tDCS leads to compromised executive functioning compared to anodal stimulation. In a between-subject design with 88 healthy psychology students, we compared the impact of anodal and cathodal stimulation against a sham condition, on performance on a Stroop task (during active stimulation) and on an n-back task (completed 15 minutes after active stimulation ended). We found significantly enhanced accuracy in the n-back task after anodal stimulation compared with sham, as well as speeded reactions in the Stroop tasks independent of trial type. By contrast, we found no modulation of Stroop interference effects or Stroop sequence effects. No inhibitory effects of cathodal stimulation were observed. These results support the causal role of the left DLPFC in working memory but lend no support to its involvement in Stroop interference control. Springer US 2019-06-10 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7012981/ /pubmed/31183619 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00726-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Baumert, Anna Buchholz, Nita Zinkernagel, Axel Clarke, Patrick MacLeod, Colin Osinsky, Roman Schmitt, Manfred Causal underpinnings of working memory and Stroop interference control: Testing the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS over the left DLPFC |
title | Causal underpinnings of working memory and Stroop interference control: Testing the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS over the left DLPFC |
title_full | Causal underpinnings of working memory and Stroop interference control: Testing the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS over the left DLPFC |
title_fullStr | Causal underpinnings of working memory and Stroop interference control: Testing the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS over the left DLPFC |
title_full_unstemmed | Causal underpinnings of working memory and Stroop interference control: Testing the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS over the left DLPFC |
title_short | Causal underpinnings of working memory and Stroop interference control: Testing the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS over the left DLPFC |
title_sort | causal underpinnings of working memory and stroop interference control: testing the effects of anodal and cathodal tdcs over the left dlpfc |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7012981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31183619 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00726-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baumertanna causalunderpinningsofworkingmemoryandstroopinterferencecontroltestingtheeffectsofanodalandcathodaltdcsovertheleftdlpfc AT buchholznita causalunderpinningsofworkingmemoryandstroopinterferencecontroltestingtheeffectsofanodalandcathodaltdcsovertheleftdlpfc AT zinkernagelaxel causalunderpinningsofworkingmemoryandstroopinterferencecontroltestingtheeffectsofanodalandcathodaltdcsovertheleftdlpfc AT clarkepatrick causalunderpinningsofworkingmemoryandstroopinterferencecontroltestingtheeffectsofanodalandcathodaltdcsovertheleftdlpfc AT macleodcolin causalunderpinningsofworkingmemoryandstroopinterferencecontroltestingtheeffectsofanodalandcathodaltdcsovertheleftdlpfc AT osinskyroman causalunderpinningsofworkingmemoryandstroopinterferencecontroltestingtheeffectsofanodalandcathodaltdcsovertheleftdlpfc AT schmittmanfred causalunderpinningsofworkingmemoryandstroopinterferencecontroltestingtheeffectsofanodalandcathodaltdcsovertheleftdlpfc |