Cargando…

Variability in lutetium-177 SPECT quantification between different state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems

BACKGROUND: Quantitative SPECT imaging in targeted radionuclide therapy with lutetium-177 holds great potential for individualized treatment based on dose assessment. The establishment of dose-effect relations requires a standardized method for SPECT quantification. The purpose of this multi-center...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peters, Steffie M. B., Meyer Viol, Sebastiaan L., van der Werf, Niels R., de Jong, Nick, van Velden, Floris H. P., Meeuwis, Antoi, Konijnenberg, Mark W., Gotthardt, Martin, de Jong, Hugo W. A. M., Segbers, Marcel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7013023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32048097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-0278-3
_version_ 1783496326248398848
author Peters, Steffie M. B.
Meyer Viol, Sebastiaan L.
van der Werf, Niels R.
de Jong, Nick
van Velden, Floris H. P.
Meeuwis, Antoi
Konijnenberg, Mark W.
Gotthardt, Martin
de Jong, Hugo W. A. M.
Segbers, Marcel
author_facet Peters, Steffie M. B.
Meyer Viol, Sebastiaan L.
van der Werf, Niels R.
de Jong, Nick
van Velden, Floris H. P.
Meeuwis, Antoi
Konijnenberg, Mark W.
Gotthardt, Martin
de Jong, Hugo W. A. M.
Segbers, Marcel
author_sort Peters, Steffie M. B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quantitative SPECT imaging in targeted radionuclide therapy with lutetium-177 holds great potential for individualized treatment based on dose assessment. The establishment of dose-effect relations requires a standardized method for SPECT quantification. The purpose of this multi-center study is to evaluate quantitative accuracy and inter-system variations of different SPECT/CT systems with corresponding commercially available quantitative reconstruction algorithms. This is an important step towards a vendor-independent standard for quantitative lutetium-177 SPECT. METHODS: Four state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems were included: Discovery™ NM/CT 670Pro (GE Healthcare), Symbia Intevo™, and two Symbia™ T16 (Siemens Healthineers). Quantitative accuracy and inter-system variations were evaluated by repeatedly scanning a cylindrical phantom with 6 spherical inserts (0.5 – 113 ml). A sphere-to-background activity concentration ratio of 10:1 was used. Acquisition settings were standardized: medium energy collimator, body contour trajectory, photon energy window of 208 keV (± 10%), adjacent 20% lower scatter window, 2 × 64 projections, 128 × 128 matrix size, and 40 s projection time. Reconstructions were performed using GE Evolution with Q.Metrix™, Siemens xSPECT Quant™, Siemens Broad Quantification™ or Siemens Flash3D™ algorithms using vendor recommended settings. In addition, projection data were reconstructed using Hermes SUV SPECT™ with standardized reconstruction settings to obtain a vendor-neutral quantitative reconstruction for all systems. Volumes of interest (VOI) for the spheres were obtained by applying a 50% threshold of the sphere maximum voxel value corrected for background activity. For each sphere, the mean and maximum recovery coefficient (RC(mean) and RC(max)) of three repeated measurements was calculated, defined as the imaged activity concentration divided by the actual activity concentration. Inter-system variations were defined as the range of RC over all systems. RESULTS: RC decreased with decreasing sphere volume. Inter-system variations with vendor-specific reconstructions were between 0.06 and 0.41 for RC(mean) depending on sphere size (maximum 118% quantification difference), and improved to 0.02–0.19 with vendor-neutral reconstructions (maximum 38% quantification difference). CONCLUSION: This study shows that eliminating sources of possible variation drastically reduces inter-system variation in quantification. This means that absolute SPECT quantification for (177)Lu is feasible in a multi-center and multi-vendor setting; however, close agreement between vendors and sites is key for multi-center dosimetry and quantitative biomarker studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7013023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70130232020-02-25 Variability in lutetium-177 SPECT quantification between different state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems Peters, Steffie M. B. Meyer Viol, Sebastiaan L. van der Werf, Niels R. de Jong, Nick van Velden, Floris H. P. Meeuwis, Antoi Konijnenberg, Mark W. Gotthardt, Martin de Jong, Hugo W. A. M. Segbers, Marcel EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: Quantitative SPECT imaging in targeted radionuclide therapy with lutetium-177 holds great potential for individualized treatment based on dose assessment. The establishment of dose-effect relations requires a standardized method for SPECT quantification. The purpose of this multi-center study is to evaluate quantitative accuracy and inter-system variations of different SPECT/CT systems with corresponding commercially available quantitative reconstruction algorithms. This is an important step towards a vendor-independent standard for quantitative lutetium-177 SPECT. METHODS: Four state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems were included: Discovery™ NM/CT 670Pro (GE Healthcare), Symbia Intevo™, and two Symbia™ T16 (Siemens Healthineers). Quantitative accuracy and inter-system variations were evaluated by repeatedly scanning a cylindrical phantom with 6 spherical inserts (0.5 – 113 ml). A sphere-to-background activity concentration ratio of 10:1 was used. Acquisition settings were standardized: medium energy collimator, body contour trajectory, photon energy window of 208 keV (± 10%), adjacent 20% lower scatter window, 2 × 64 projections, 128 × 128 matrix size, and 40 s projection time. Reconstructions were performed using GE Evolution with Q.Metrix™, Siemens xSPECT Quant™, Siemens Broad Quantification™ or Siemens Flash3D™ algorithms using vendor recommended settings. In addition, projection data were reconstructed using Hermes SUV SPECT™ with standardized reconstruction settings to obtain a vendor-neutral quantitative reconstruction for all systems. Volumes of interest (VOI) for the spheres were obtained by applying a 50% threshold of the sphere maximum voxel value corrected for background activity. For each sphere, the mean and maximum recovery coefficient (RC(mean) and RC(max)) of three repeated measurements was calculated, defined as the imaged activity concentration divided by the actual activity concentration. Inter-system variations were defined as the range of RC over all systems. RESULTS: RC decreased with decreasing sphere volume. Inter-system variations with vendor-specific reconstructions were between 0.06 and 0.41 for RC(mean) depending on sphere size (maximum 118% quantification difference), and improved to 0.02–0.19 with vendor-neutral reconstructions (maximum 38% quantification difference). CONCLUSION: This study shows that eliminating sources of possible variation drastically reduces inter-system variation in quantification. This means that absolute SPECT quantification for (177)Lu is feasible in a multi-center and multi-vendor setting; however, close agreement between vendors and sites is key for multi-center dosimetry and quantitative biomarker studies. Springer International Publishing 2020-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7013023/ /pubmed/32048097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-0278-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2020, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Peters, Steffie M. B.
Meyer Viol, Sebastiaan L.
van der Werf, Niels R.
de Jong, Nick
van Velden, Floris H. P.
Meeuwis, Antoi
Konijnenberg, Mark W.
Gotthardt, Martin
de Jong, Hugo W. A. M.
Segbers, Marcel
Variability in lutetium-177 SPECT quantification between different state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems
title Variability in lutetium-177 SPECT quantification between different state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems
title_full Variability in lutetium-177 SPECT quantification between different state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems
title_fullStr Variability in lutetium-177 SPECT quantification between different state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems
title_full_unstemmed Variability in lutetium-177 SPECT quantification between different state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems
title_short Variability in lutetium-177 SPECT quantification between different state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems
title_sort variability in lutetium-177 spect quantification between different state-of-the-art spect/ct systems
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7013023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32048097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-0278-3
work_keys_str_mv AT peterssteffiemb variabilityinlutetium177spectquantificationbetweendifferentstateoftheartspectctsystems
AT meyerviolsebastiaanl variabilityinlutetium177spectquantificationbetweendifferentstateoftheartspectctsystems
AT vanderwerfnielsr variabilityinlutetium177spectquantificationbetweendifferentstateoftheartspectctsystems
AT dejongnick variabilityinlutetium177spectquantificationbetweendifferentstateoftheartspectctsystems
AT vanveldenflorishp variabilityinlutetium177spectquantificationbetweendifferentstateoftheartspectctsystems
AT meeuwisantoi variabilityinlutetium177spectquantificationbetweendifferentstateoftheartspectctsystems
AT konijnenbergmarkw variabilityinlutetium177spectquantificationbetweendifferentstateoftheartspectctsystems
AT gotthardtmartin variabilityinlutetium177spectquantificationbetweendifferentstateoftheartspectctsystems
AT dejonghugowam variabilityinlutetium177spectquantificationbetweendifferentstateoftheartspectctsystems
AT segbersmarcel variabilityinlutetium177spectquantificationbetweendifferentstateoftheartspectctsystems