Cargando…

FOLFOX treatment response prediction in metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer patients via machine learning algorithms

Early identification of metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who will be sensitive to FOLFOX (5‐FU, leucovorin and oxaliplatin) therapy is very important. We performed microarray meta‐analysis to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between FOLFOX responders and nonresp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Wei, Fu, Dongliang, Kong, Xiangxing, Huang, Zhiheng, Hwang, Maxwell, Zhu, Yingshuang, Chen, Liubo, Jiang, Kai, Li, Xinlin, Wu, Yihua, Li, Jun, Yuan, Ying, Ding, Kefeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7013065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31893575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2786
_version_ 1783496335667757056
author Lu, Wei
Fu, Dongliang
Kong, Xiangxing
Huang, Zhiheng
Hwang, Maxwell
Zhu, Yingshuang
Chen, Liubo
Jiang, Kai
Li, Xinlin
Wu, Yihua
Li, Jun
Yuan, Ying
Ding, Kefeng
author_facet Lu, Wei
Fu, Dongliang
Kong, Xiangxing
Huang, Zhiheng
Hwang, Maxwell
Zhu, Yingshuang
Chen, Liubo
Jiang, Kai
Li, Xinlin
Wu, Yihua
Li, Jun
Yuan, Ying
Ding, Kefeng
author_sort Lu, Wei
collection PubMed
description Early identification of metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who will be sensitive to FOLFOX (5‐FU, leucovorin and oxaliplatin) therapy is very important. We performed microarray meta‐analysis to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between FOLFOX responders and nonresponders in metastatic or recurrent CRC patients, and found that the expression levels of WASHC4, HELZ, ERN1, RPS6KB1, and APPBP2 were downregulated, while the expression levels of IRF7, EML3, LYPLA2, DRAP1, RNH1, PKP3, TSPAN17, LSS, MLKL, PPP1R7, GCDH, C19ORF24, and CCDC124 were upregulated in FOLFOX responders compared with nonresponders. Subsequent functional annotation showed that DEGs were significantly enriched in autophagy, ErbB signaling pathway, mitophagy, endocytosis, FoxO signaling pathway, apoptosis, and antifolate resistance pathways. Based on those candidate genes, several machine learning algorithms were applied to the training set, then performances of models were assessed via the cross validation method. Candidate models with the best tuning parameters were applied to the test set and the final model showed satisfactory performance. In addition, we also reported that MLKL and CCDC124 gene expression were independent prognostic factors for metastatic CRC patients undergoing FOLFOX therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7013065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70130652020-02-19 FOLFOX treatment response prediction in metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer patients via machine learning algorithms Lu, Wei Fu, Dongliang Kong, Xiangxing Huang, Zhiheng Hwang, Maxwell Zhu, Yingshuang Chen, Liubo Jiang, Kai Li, Xinlin Wu, Yihua Li, Jun Yuan, Ying Ding, Kefeng Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research Early identification of metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who will be sensitive to FOLFOX (5‐FU, leucovorin and oxaliplatin) therapy is very important. We performed microarray meta‐analysis to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between FOLFOX responders and nonresponders in metastatic or recurrent CRC patients, and found that the expression levels of WASHC4, HELZ, ERN1, RPS6KB1, and APPBP2 were downregulated, while the expression levels of IRF7, EML3, LYPLA2, DRAP1, RNH1, PKP3, TSPAN17, LSS, MLKL, PPP1R7, GCDH, C19ORF24, and CCDC124 were upregulated in FOLFOX responders compared with nonresponders. Subsequent functional annotation showed that DEGs were significantly enriched in autophagy, ErbB signaling pathway, mitophagy, endocytosis, FoxO signaling pathway, apoptosis, and antifolate resistance pathways. Based on those candidate genes, several machine learning algorithms were applied to the training set, then performances of models were assessed via the cross validation method. Candidate models with the best tuning parameters were applied to the test set and the final model showed satisfactory performance. In addition, we also reported that MLKL and CCDC124 gene expression were independent prognostic factors for metastatic CRC patients undergoing FOLFOX therapy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7013065/ /pubmed/31893575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2786 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Lu, Wei
Fu, Dongliang
Kong, Xiangxing
Huang, Zhiheng
Hwang, Maxwell
Zhu, Yingshuang
Chen, Liubo
Jiang, Kai
Li, Xinlin
Wu, Yihua
Li, Jun
Yuan, Ying
Ding, Kefeng
FOLFOX treatment response prediction in metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer patients via machine learning algorithms
title FOLFOX treatment response prediction in metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer patients via machine learning algorithms
title_full FOLFOX treatment response prediction in metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer patients via machine learning algorithms
title_fullStr FOLFOX treatment response prediction in metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer patients via machine learning algorithms
title_full_unstemmed FOLFOX treatment response prediction in metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer patients via machine learning algorithms
title_short FOLFOX treatment response prediction in metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer patients via machine learning algorithms
title_sort folfox treatment response prediction in metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer patients via machine learning algorithms
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7013065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31893575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2786
work_keys_str_mv AT luwei folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms
AT fudongliang folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms
AT kongxiangxing folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms
AT huangzhiheng folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms
AT hwangmaxwell folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms
AT zhuyingshuang folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms
AT chenliubo folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms
AT jiangkai folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms
AT lixinlin folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms
AT wuyihua folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms
AT lijun folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms
AT yuanying folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms
AT dingkefeng folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms