Cargando…
FOLFOX treatment response prediction in metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer patients via machine learning algorithms
Early identification of metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who will be sensitive to FOLFOX (5‐FU, leucovorin and oxaliplatin) therapy is very important. We performed microarray meta‐analysis to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between FOLFOX responders and nonresp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7013065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31893575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2786 |
_version_ | 1783496335667757056 |
---|---|
author | Lu, Wei Fu, Dongliang Kong, Xiangxing Huang, Zhiheng Hwang, Maxwell Zhu, Yingshuang Chen, Liubo Jiang, Kai Li, Xinlin Wu, Yihua Li, Jun Yuan, Ying Ding, Kefeng |
author_facet | Lu, Wei Fu, Dongliang Kong, Xiangxing Huang, Zhiheng Hwang, Maxwell Zhu, Yingshuang Chen, Liubo Jiang, Kai Li, Xinlin Wu, Yihua Li, Jun Yuan, Ying Ding, Kefeng |
author_sort | Lu, Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Early identification of metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who will be sensitive to FOLFOX (5‐FU, leucovorin and oxaliplatin) therapy is very important. We performed microarray meta‐analysis to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between FOLFOX responders and nonresponders in metastatic or recurrent CRC patients, and found that the expression levels of WASHC4, HELZ, ERN1, RPS6KB1, and APPBP2 were downregulated, while the expression levels of IRF7, EML3, LYPLA2, DRAP1, RNH1, PKP3, TSPAN17, LSS, MLKL, PPP1R7, GCDH, C19ORF24, and CCDC124 were upregulated in FOLFOX responders compared with nonresponders. Subsequent functional annotation showed that DEGs were significantly enriched in autophagy, ErbB signaling pathway, mitophagy, endocytosis, FoxO signaling pathway, apoptosis, and antifolate resistance pathways. Based on those candidate genes, several machine learning algorithms were applied to the training set, then performances of models were assessed via the cross validation method. Candidate models with the best tuning parameters were applied to the test set and the final model showed satisfactory performance. In addition, we also reported that MLKL and CCDC124 gene expression were independent prognostic factors for metastatic CRC patients undergoing FOLFOX therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7013065 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70130652020-02-19 FOLFOX treatment response prediction in metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer patients via machine learning algorithms Lu, Wei Fu, Dongliang Kong, Xiangxing Huang, Zhiheng Hwang, Maxwell Zhu, Yingshuang Chen, Liubo Jiang, Kai Li, Xinlin Wu, Yihua Li, Jun Yuan, Ying Ding, Kefeng Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research Early identification of metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who will be sensitive to FOLFOX (5‐FU, leucovorin and oxaliplatin) therapy is very important. We performed microarray meta‐analysis to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between FOLFOX responders and nonresponders in metastatic or recurrent CRC patients, and found that the expression levels of WASHC4, HELZ, ERN1, RPS6KB1, and APPBP2 were downregulated, while the expression levels of IRF7, EML3, LYPLA2, DRAP1, RNH1, PKP3, TSPAN17, LSS, MLKL, PPP1R7, GCDH, C19ORF24, and CCDC124 were upregulated in FOLFOX responders compared with nonresponders. Subsequent functional annotation showed that DEGs were significantly enriched in autophagy, ErbB signaling pathway, mitophagy, endocytosis, FoxO signaling pathway, apoptosis, and antifolate resistance pathways. Based on those candidate genes, several machine learning algorithms were applied to the training set, then performances of models were assessed via the cross validation method. Candidate models with the best tuning parameters were applied to the test set and the final model showed satisfactory performance. In addition, we also reported that MLKL and CCDC124 gene expression were independent prognostic factors for metastatic CRC patients undergoing FOLFOX therapy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7013065/ /pubmed/31893575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2786 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cancer Research Lu, Wei Fu, Dongliang Kong, Xiangxing Huang, Zhiheng Hwang, Maxwell Zhu, Yingshuang Chen, Liubo Jiang, Kai Li, Xinlin Wu, Yihua Li, Jun Yuan, Ying Ding, Kefeng FOLFOX treatment response prediction in metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer patients via machine learning algorithms |
title | FOLFOX treatment response prediction in metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer patients via machine learning algorithms |
title_full | FOLFOX treatment response prediction in metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer patients via machine learning algorithms |
title_fullStr | FOLFOX treatment response prediction in metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer patients via machine learning algorithms |
title_full_unstemmed | FOLFOX treatment response prediction in metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer patients via machine learning algorithms |
title_short | FOLFOX treatment response prediction in metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer patients via machine learning algorithms |
title_sort | folfox treatment response prediction in metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer patients via machine learning algorithms |
topic | Clinical Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7013065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31893575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2786 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luwei folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms AT fudongliang folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms AT kongxiangxing folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms AT huangzhiheng folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms AT hwangmaxwell folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms AT zhuyingshuang folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms AT chenliubo folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms AT jiangkai folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms AT lixinlin folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms AT wuyihua folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms AT lijun folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms AT yuanying folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms AT dingkefeng folfoxtreatmentresponsepredictioninmetastaticorrecurrentcolorectalcancerpatientsviamachinelearningalgorithms |