Cargando…

Pattern measures of sedentary behaviour in adults: A literature review

OBJECTIVE: With sensors, we are increasingly able to assess sitting behaviour during the day. However, there is no consensus among researchers on the best outcome measures for representing the accumulation of sedentary time during the day. METHODS: We analysed the pattern measures of sedentary behav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boerema, Simone T, van Velsen, Lex, Vollenbroek, Miriam MR, Hermens, Hermie J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7013117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207620905418
_version_ 1783496347253473280
author Boerema, Simone T
van Velsen, Lex
Vollenbroek, Miriam MR
Hermens, Hermie J
author_facet Boerema, Simone T
van Velsen, Lex
Vollenbroek, Miriam MR
Hermens, Hermie J
author_sort Boerema, Simone T
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: With sensors, we are increasingly able to assess sitting behaviour during the day. However, there is no consensus among researchers on the best outcome measures for representing the accumulation of sedentary time during the day. METHODS: We analysed the pattern measures of sedentary behaviour. Articles reporting patterns measures in adults, in which behaviour data was collected with a sensor were included. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the pattern measures of sedentary behaviour and provide recommendations for choosing objective measures of sedentary behaviour. RESULTS: Most studies report the number of sitting bouts during the day. Others focus on the number of breaks and/or periods of physical activity. Simple measures of sedentary behaviour were most popular. More complex pattern measures, such as the Gini index or the half-life bout duration, that capture the distribution of lengths of sitting periods in a single number, were reported sparsely. The sedentary patterns that were reported in the various studies were difficult to compare, due to the differences among measurement devices, data analysis protocols and a lack of basic outcome parameters such as total wear-time and total sedentary time. CONCLUSIONS: Objective sedentary measures can be grouped into simple and complex measures of sedentary time accumulation during the day. These measures serve different goals. The answer to the question as to which measures are most suitable to report, is strongly dependent on the research question. We have shown that the reported measures were dependent on (a) the sensing method, (b) the classification method, (c) the experimental and data cleaning protocol and (d) the applied definitions of bouts and breaks. We recommend that studies should always report total wear-time, total sedentary time, number of bouts and at least one measure describing the diversity of bout lengths in the sedentary behaviour such as the half-life bout duration. Additionally, we recommend reporting the measurement conditions and data processing steps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7013117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70131172020-02-24 Pattern measures of sedentary behaviour in adults: A literature review Boerema, Simone T van Velsen, Lex Vollenbroek, Miriam MR Hermens, Hermie J Digit Health Review Article OBJECTIVE: With sensors, we are increasingly able to assess sitting behaviour during the day. However, there is no consensus among researchers on the best outcome measures for representing the accumulation of sedentary time during the day. METHODS: We analysed the pattern measures of sedentary behaviour. Articles reporting patterns measures in adults, in which behaviour data was collected with a sensor were included. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the pattern measures of sedentary behaviour and provide recommendations for choosing objective measures of sedentary behaviour. RESULTS: Most studies report the number of sitting bouts during the day. Others focus on the number of breaks and/or periods of physical activity. Simple measures of sedentary behaviour were most popular. More complex pattern measures, such as the Gini index or the half-life bout duration, that capture the distribution of lengths of sitting periods in a single number, were reported sparsely. The sedentary patterns that were reported in the various studies were difficult to compare, due to the differences among measurement devices, data analysis protocols and a lack of basic outcome parameters such as total wear-time and total sedentary time. CONCLUSIONS: Objective sedentary measures can be grouped into simple and complex measures of sedentary time accumulation during the day. These measures serve different goals. The answer to the question as to which measures are most suitable to report, is strongly dependent on the research question. We have shown that the reported measures were dependent on (a) the sensing method, (b) the classification method, (c) the experimental and data cleaning protocol and (d) the applied definitions of bouts and breaks. We recommend that studies should always report total wear-time, total sedentary time, number of bouts and at least one measure describing the diversity of bout lengths in the sedentary behaviour such as the half-life bout duration. Additionally, we recommend reporting the measurement conditions and data processing steps. SAGE Publications 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7013117/ /pubmed/32095261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207620905418 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review Article
Boerema, Simone T
van Velsen, Lex
Vollenbroek, Miriam MR
Hermens, Hermie J
Pattern measures of sedentary behaviour in adults: A literature review
title Pattern measures of sedentary behaviour in adults: A literature review
title_full Pattern measures of sedentary behaviour in adults: A literature review
title_fullStr Pattern measures of sedentary behaviour in adults: A literature review
title_full_unstemmed Pattern measures of sedentary behaviour in adults: A literature review
title_short Pattern measures of sedentary behaviour in adults: A literature review
title_sort pattern measures of sedentary behaviour in adults: a literature review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7013117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207620905418
work_keys_str_mv AT boeremasimonet patternmeasuresofsedentarybehaviourinadultsaliteraturereview
AT vanvelsenlex patternmeasuresofsedentarybehaviourinadultsaliteraturereview
AT vollenbroekmiriammr patternmeasuresofsedentarybehaviourinadultsaliteraturereview
AT hermenshermiej patternmeasuresofsedentarybehaviourinadultsaliteraturereview