Cargando…

Agreement between area- and individual-level income measures in a population-based cohort: Implications for population health research

Socioeconomic status is an important determinant of health, the measurement of which is of great significance to population health research. However, individual-level socioeconomic factors are absent from much health administrative data, resulting in widespread use of area-level measures in their pl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buajitti, Emmalin, Chiodo, Sabrina, Rosella, Laura C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7013127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32072008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100553
_version_ 1783496349684072448
author Buajitti, Emmalin
Chiodo, Sabrina
Rosella, Laura C.
author_facet Buajitti, Emmalin
Chiodo, Sabrina
Rosella, Laura C.
author_sort Buajitti, Emmalin
collection PubMed
description Socioeconomic status is an important determinant of health, the measurement of which is of great significance to population health research. However, individual-level socioeconomic factors are absent from much health administrative data, resulting in widespread use of area-level measures in their place. This study aims to clarify the role of individual- and area-level socioeconomic status in Ontario, Canada, through comparison of income measures. Using data from four cycles (2005–2012) of the Canadian Community Health Survey, we assessed concordance between individual- and area-level income quintiles using percent agreement and Kappa statistics. Individual-level characteristics were compared at baseline. Cumulative adult premature mortality was calculated for 5-years following interview. Rates were calculated separately for area-level and individual-level income, and jointly for each combination of income groups. Multivariable negative binomial models were fit to estimate associations between area- and individual-level income quintile and premature mortality after adjustment for basic demographics (age, sex, interview cycle) and key risk factors (alcohol, smoking, physical activity, and body mass index). Agreement between individual- and area-level income measures was low. Kappa statistics for same and similar (i.e. ±1 quintile) measures were 0.11 and 0.48, indicating low and moderate agreement, respectively. Socioeconomic disparities in premature mortality were greater for individual-level income than area-level income. When rates were stratified by both area- and individual-level income quintiles simultaneously, individual-level income gradients persisted within each area-level income group. The association between income and premature mortality was significant for both measures, including after full adjustment. Area-level socioeconomic status is an inappropriate proxy for missing individual-level data. The low agreement between area- and individual-level income measures and differences in demographic profile indicate that the two socioeconomic status measures do not capture the same population groups. However, our findings demonstrate that both individual- and area-level income measures are associated with premature mortality, and describe unique socioeconomic inequities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7013127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70131272020-02-18 Agreement between area- and individual-level income measures in a population-based cohort: Implications for population health research Buajitti, Emmalin Chiodo, Sabrina Rosella, Laura C. SSM Popul Health Article Socioeconomic status is an important determinant of health, the measurement of which is of great significance to population health research. However, individual-level socioeconomic factors are absent from much health administrative data, resulting in widespread use of area-level measures in their place. This study aims to clarify the role of individual- and area-level socioeconomic status in Ontario, Canada, through comparison of income measures. Using data from four cycles (2005–2012) of the Canadian Community Health Survey, we assessed concordance between individual- and area-level income quintiles using percent agreement and Kappa statistics. Individual-level characteristics were compared at baseline. Cumulative adult premature mortality was calculated for 5-years following interview. Rates were calculated separately for area-level and individual-level income, and jointly for each combination of income groups. Multivariable negative binomial models were fit to estimate associations between area- and individual-level income quintile and premature mortality after adjustment for basic demographics (age, sex, interview cycle) and key risk factors (alcohol, smoking, physical activity, and body mass index). Agreement between individual- and area-level income measures was low. Kappa statistics for same and similar (i.e. ±1 quintile) measures were 0.11 and 0.48, indicating low and moderate agreement, respectively. Socioeconomic disparities in premature mortality were greater for individual-level income than area-level income. When rates were stratified by both area- and individual-level income quintiles simultaneously, individual-level income gradients persisted within each area-level income group. The association between income and premature mortality was significant for both measures, including after full adjustment. Area-level socioeconomic status is an inappropriate proxy for missing individual-level data. The low agreement between area- and individual-level income measures and differences in demographic profile indicate that the two socioeconomic status measures do not capture the same population groups. However, our findings demonstrate that both individual- and area-level income measures are associated with premature mortality, and describe unique socioeconomic inequities. Elsevier 2020-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7013127/ /pubmed/32072008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100553 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Buajitti, Emmalin
Chiodo, Sabrina
Rosella, Laura C.
Agreement between area- and individual-level income measures in a population-based cohort: Implications for population health research
title Agreement between area- and individual-level income measures in a population-based cohort: Implications for population health research
title_full Agreement between area- and individual-level income measures in a population-based cohort: Implications for population health research
title_fullStr Agreement between area- and individual-level income measures in a population-based cohort: Implications for population health research
title_full_unstemmed Agreement between area- and individual-level income measures in a population-based cohort: Implications for population health research
title_short Agreement between area- and individual-level income measures in a population-based cohort: Implications for population health research
title_sort agreement between area- and individual-level income measures in a population-based cohort: implications for population health research
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7013127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32072008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100553
work_keys_str_mv AT buajittiemmalin agreementbetweenareaandindividuallevelincomemeasuresinapopulationbasedcohortimplicationsforpopulationhealthresearch
AT chiodosabrina agreementbetweenareaandindividuallevelincomemeasuresinapopulationbasedcohortimplicationsforpopulationhealthresearch
AT rosellalaurac agreementbetweenareaandindividuallevelincomemeasuresinapopulationbasedcohortimplicationsforpopulationhealthresearch